Interplay of different NOM fouling mechanisms during ultrafiltration for drinking water production.

Ultrafiltration is an emerging technology for drinking water production, but a main challenge remains the lack of understanding about fouling. This paper investigates the impact of molecular interactions between different natural organic matter (NOM) compounds on ultrafiltration fouling mechanisms. We performed dead-end filtration experiments with individual and mixed humic acid and alginate (polysaccharide). Alginate showed detrimental, but mostly reversible, flux decline and high solute retention. Our results indicate that this was caused by pore blocking transformed into cake building and weak molecular foulant-membrane and foulant-foulant interactions. In the presence of calcium, aggravated fouling was observed, related to complexation of alginate and its subsequently induced gel formation. With humic acid, more severe irreversible fouling occurred due to humic acid adsorption. Minor adsorption of alginate onto the membrane was also observed, which probably caused the substantial irreversible flux decline. The fouling characteristics in the mixtures reflected a combination of the individual humic acid and alginate experiments and we conclude, that the individual fouling mechanisms mutually influence each other. A model elucidates this interplay of the individual fouling mechanisms via hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. In our study such an interplay resulted in an alginate cake, or gel in the presence of calcium, which is relatively irreversibly adsorbed onto the membrane by humic acid associations. This study shows the importance of mutual influences between various foulants for improved understanding of fouling phenomena. Furthermore it shows that substances with a minor individual influence might have a large impact in mixed systems such as natural water.

[1]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1996 .

[2]  Jean-Philippe Croué,et al.  Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM). , 2004, Water research.

[3]  Kimberly L. Jones,et al.  Protein and humic acid adsorption onto hydrophilic membrane surfaces: effects of pH and ionic strength , 2000 .

[4]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer , 1994 .

[5]  M. Clark,et al.  Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes , 1994 .

[6]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  MEMBRANE FILTRATION OF NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER: INITIAL COMPARISON OF REJECTION AND FLUX DECLINE CHARACTERISTICS WITH ULTRAFILTRATION AND NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES , 1999 .

[7]  T. Thorsen,et al.  Concentration polarisation by natural organic matter (NOM) in NF and UF , 2004 .

[8]  B. Jefferson,et al.  Dead-end filtration of natural organic matter: experimental evidence of critical conditions , 2005 .

[9]  Vicki Chen,et al.  Fouling mechanisms of alginate solutions as model extracellular polymeric substances , 2005 .

[10]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: implications for fouling control , 2002 .

[11]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Synergistic effects in combined fouling of a loose nanofiltration membrane by colloidal materials and natural organic matter , 2006 .

[12]  Gary Amy,et al.  Characterizing algogenic organic matter (AOM) and evaluating associated NF membrane fouling. , 2004, Water research.

[13]  J. Laîné,et al.  Control fouling and cleaning procedures of UF membranes by a streaming potential method , 1998 .

[14]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Interactions between natural organic matter (NOM) and membranes: Rejection and fouling , 1999 .

[15]  T. A. Davis,et al.  A review of the biochemistry of heavy metal biosorption by brown algae. , 2003, Water research.

[16]  Kerry J. Howe,et al.  Filtration of lake natural organic matter: Adsorption capacity of a polypropylene microfilter , 2005 .

[17]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Relating organic fouling of reverse osmosis membranes to intermolecular adhesion forces. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Andrea I. Schäfer,et al.  Ultrafiltration of natural organic matter , 2001 .

[19]  K. Kimura,et al.  Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. , 2004, Water research.

[20]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Combined influence of natural organic matter (NOM) and colloidal particles on nanofiltration membrane fouling , 2005 .

[21]  M. Ulbricht,et al.  Influence of ultrafiltration membrane characteristics on adsorptive fouling with dextrans , 2005 .

[22]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Mechanisms of colloidal natural organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration , 2006 .

[23]  M. Clark,et al.  Diffusion and partitioning of humic acid in a porous ultrafiltration membrane , 1998 .

[24]  A. Fane,et al.  Fouling effects on rejection in the membrane filtration of natural waters , 2000 .

[25]  F. Frimmel,et al.  A liquid chromatographic system with multi-detection for the direct analysis of hydrophilic organic compounds in natural waters , 1992 .

[26]  E. Molis,et al.  The effect of CA membrane properties on adsorptive fouling by humic acid , 1999 .