On the (non)categorical perception of lexical tones

Identification and discrimination of lexical tones in Cantonese were compared in the context of a traditional categorical perception paradigm. Three lexical tone continua were used: one ranging from low level to high level, one from high rising to high level, and one from low falling to high rising. Identification data showed steep slopes at category boundaries, suggesting that lexical tones are perceived categorically. In contrast, discrimination curves generally showed much weaker evidence for categorical perception. Subsequent investigation showed that the presence of a tonal context played a strong role in the identification of target tones and less of a role in discrimination. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that tonal category boundaries are determined by a combination of regions of natural auditory sensitivity and the influence of linguistic experience.

[1]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  A. Liberman,et al.  An Effect of Learning on Speech Perception: The Discrimination of Durations of Silence with and without Phonemic Significance , 1961 .

[3]  A. Liberman,et al.  The discrimination of relative onset-time of the components of certain speech and nonspeech patterns. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  A. Liberman,et al.  The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels , 1962 .

[5]  W. P. Tanner,et al.  Experimental Study of “Tone Deafness” , 1964 .

[6]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Crosslanguage Study of Vowel Perception , 1969, Language and speech.

[7]  I J Hirsh,et al.  Pitch of tone bursts of changing frequency. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  I. Pollack,et al.  On the comparison between identification and discrimination tests in speech perception , 1971 .

[9]  Angela Chan Yuen Yuen.  A perceptual study of tones in Cantonese , 1971 .

[10]  S. Schumm,et al.  Experimental Study of Channel Patterns , 1972 .

[11]  D. Klatt,et al.  Discrimination of fundamental frequency contours in synthetic speech: implications for models of pitch perception. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants , 1975, Science.

[13]  S. Harnad,et al.  Origins and Evolution of Language and Speech , 1976 .

[14]  Timothy J. Vance,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Tone and Intonation in Cantonese , 1976 .

[15]  Arthur S. Abramson,et al.  Noncategorical perception of tone categories in Thai , 1977 .

[16]  L. Williams,et al.  The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals , 1977 .

[17]  J D Miller,et al.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: identification function for synthetic VOT stimuli. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Jean-Marie Humbert,et al.  Consonant Types, Vowel Quality, and Tone , 1978 .

[19]  J. Gandour,et al.  The Perception of Tone , 1978 .

[20]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Identification, discrimination, and selective adaptation of simultaneous musical intervals , 1979 .

[21]  B H Repp,et al.  Categories and context in the perception of isolated steady-state vowels. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  A note on possible culture-bound effects in frequency discrimination. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J. Leather,et al.  Speaker normalization in perception of lexical tone , 1983 .

[24]  Jack Gandour,et al.  Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. , 1983 .

[25]  M E Schouten,et al.  Identification and discrimination of sweep tones , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Beyond the categorical/continuous distinction: A psychophysical approach to processing modes. , 1987 .

[27]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  The special-mechanisms debate in speech research: Categorization tests on animals and infants. , 1987 .

[28]  D. Klatt,et al.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Major/Minor Triad Identification and Discrimination by Musically Trained and Untrained Listeners , 1992 .

[30]  J. R. Stagray,et al.  Differential Sensitivity for Frequency among Speakers of a Tone and a Nontone Language. , 1993 .

[31]  馮 蘊澤,et al.  The Phonological Features of Mandarin Tones , 1993 .

[32]  Virginia Yip,et al.  Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar , 1994 .

[33]  Robert S. Bauer,et al.  Modern Cantonese Phonology , 1997 .

[34]  Corinne B. Moore,et al.  Speaker normalization in the perception of Mandarin Chinese tones. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Miguel Rodríguez Mondoñedo,et al.  Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. A Guide to the Use of the lnternational Phonetic Alphahet. Cambridge: University Press, 1999. 204 pp. , 1999 .

[36]  P. Wong.  THE EFFECT OF DOWNDRIFT IN THE PRODUCTION AND PERCEPTION OF CANTONESE LEVEL TONES , 1999 .

[37]  V. Ciocca,et al.  The development of the perception of Cantonese lexical tones , 2003 .

[38]  Patrick C M Wong,et al.  Perceptual normalization for inter- and intratalker variation in Cantonese level tones. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Stimulus presentation order and the perception of lexical tones in Cantonese. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  F. Baller.  A Mandarin primer = 英華合璧 , 2022 .