Research on the Relationship between Dynamic Message Sign Control Strategies and Driving Safety in Freeway Work Zones

Several studies have researched the effect of dynamic message signs (DMSs) on the driving safety in work zones. However, only a few studies have examined the design of DMS control strategies in work zones. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of DMS control strategies on driving decisions and behaviors and to improve the driving safety in work zones by changing the content and placement of DMSs. In this study, five control strategies are proposed by combining five DMSs with different contents (“change lane“ versus “go straight“). A total of 32 participants participated in this study. Each participant drove in five scenarios in a high-fidelity driving simulator corresponding to strategies 1-5. The results show that the control strategies have a significant effect on drivers’ decisions and behavior (e.g., the driving speed, acceleration, and lateral placement). All strategies reduce the drivers’ speeds and improve their control stability and compliance. After conducting analytic hierarchy process (AHP) analysis, strategy 2 was removed because the approaching speed exceeded the speed limit. The weight vectors of strategies 1, 3, 4, and 5 under free-flow traffic and traffic jam conditions are and , respectively. These results show that strategy 4 is not suitable for free-flow traffic in work zones, while strategies 5 and 3 are suitable for traffic jams in work zones. Strategy  3 is suitable for both free-flow traffic and traffic jams. The first occurrence of a decision sign that contains lane change content is key to the driver’s decision; in addition, the position of signage with such information should gradually be moved closer to work zones with increasing traffic flow.

[1]  J Messina,et al.  Assessing the Message Design on Variable Message Signs in Mitigating Bottleneck Issue at Work Zones , 2012 .

[2]  Richard van der Horst,et al.  Influence of Roadside Infrastructure on Driving Behavior: Driving Simulator Study , 2007 .

[3]  Chuck Bergmann.  Work Zone Awareness: Toward Zero Deaths , 2015 .

[4]  Fengxiang Qiao,et al.  Person-to-infrastructure (P2I) wireless communications for work zone safety enhancement , 2012, 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  The Possible Safety Benefits of Enhanced Road Markings: A Driving Simulator Evaluation , 2006 .

[6]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[7]  Lesley Strawderman,et al.  Work zone sign design for increased driver compliance and worker safety. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Anuj Sharma,et al.  Analyzing and Improving the Performance of Dynamic Message Sign Reporting Work Zone–Related Congestion , 2017 .

[9]  P. Gaete,et al.  Aspects of finite electrodynamics in D = 3 dimensions , 2012, 1201.5551.

[10]  Jyh-Hone Wang,et al.  Enhancing the Messages Displayed on Dynamic Message Signs , 2017 .

[11]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[12]  Herb M Simpson,et al.  On-road and simulated driving: concurrent and discriminant validation. , 2011, Journal of safety research.

[13]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Implementation of Traffic Control Devices on Highway Preservation Projects to Enhance Construction Work Zone Safety , 2014 .

[14]  A Benedetto,et al.  A driving simulator study of driver performance on deceleration lanes. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  Work Zone Safety Analysis and Modeling: A State-of-the-Art Review , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[16]  Kelly Kramer.  Improving work zone safety : top 10 things you need to know , 2015 .

[17]  Lesley Strawderman,et al.  The Effect of Design and Placement of Work-Zone Warning Signs on Driver Speed Compliance: A Simulator-Based Study , 2013 .

[18]  Peter T. Savolainen,et al.  Work Zone Safety Performance: Comparison of Alternative Traffic Control Strategies , 2017 .

[19]  Ashim Kumar Debnath,et al.  Common hazards and their mitigating measures in work zones : a qualitative study of worker perceptions , 2015 .

[20]  John Golias,et al.  Differences between Vehicle Lateral Displacement on the Road and in a Fixed-Base Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[21]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[22]  Fengxiang Qiao,et al.  Using Driving Simulator for Advance Placement of Guide Sign Design for Exits along Highways , 2007 .

[23]  J. Droulez,et al.  Speed and safety distance control in truck driving: comparison of simulation and real-world environment. , 2001 .

[24]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Behavioral issues in the design and evaluation of advanced traveler information systems , 1993 .

[25]  Jian Rong,et al.  Experimental research on the effectiveness of speed reduction markings based on driving simulation: a case study. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Using Drivers' Stop/Go Decisions in Driving Simulator to Assess Rear-End Crash Risk at Signalized Intersections , 2009 .

[27]  Saiedeh Razavi,et al.  Impact of Connected Vehicle on Work Zone Network Safety through Dynamic Route Guidance , 2016 .

[28]  David Shinar,et al.  Effect of shoulder width, guardrail and roadway geometry on driver perception and behavior. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Tracy Scriba,et al.  Implementing the Rule on Work Zone Safety and Mobility , 2005 .