The Effect of Cue-Familiarity, Cue-Distinctiveness, and Retention Interval on Prospective Remembering

Five experiments investigated the effects of cue familiarity, cue distinctiveness, and retention interval on prospective remembering. Results showed that (1) performance in a prospective memory task is facilitated when the cue is unfamiliar and/or distinctive; and (2) it is impaired by 3-minutes’ delay between the instructions and the task (Experiment 1). A beneficial effect of distinctiveness was also found when perceptual rather than semantic distinctiveness was tested (Experiment 2). Experiments 3 and 4 ruled out the hypotheses that “unfulfilled expectancy” of an event (i.e. non-appearance of the cue during training) (Experiment 3), or some sort of “habituation” in the target context (Experiment 4), may have caused the low performance observed in the delayed conditions. Finally, results from Experiment 5 showed that delay negatively affected prospective remembering when it was filled with either a demanding interpolated activity (practice in a STM task) or an undemanding motoric activity (repetitive hands movements). Unfilled delay and an undemanding verbal activity (counting) were found not to affect prospective memory. Implications for the mechanisms underlying prospective remembering are discussed.

[1]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[2]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Normal aging and prospective memory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Age-related deficits in prospective memory: the influence of task complexity. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[4]  J Engelkamp,et al.  Motor programme information as a separable memory unit , 1984, Psychological research.

[5]  S. R. Schmidt.  Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory for conceptually distinctive events. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  W. Neill,et al.  Effects of intentional versus incidental learning on explicit and implicit tests of memory , 1990 .

[7]  Graham J. Hitch,et al.  Prospective memory for future intentions: Some comparisons with memory for past events , 1991 .

[8]  B. Ross.  Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Ronald E. Johnson.  Memory-Based Rehearsal , 1980 .

[10]  D. Schacter.  Implicit memory: History and current status. , 1987 .

[11]  E. Loftus.  The glitter of everyday memory…and the gold. , 1991 .

[12]  S. Ceci,et al.  On the demise of everyday memory: "The rumors of my death are much exaggerated" (Mark Twain). , 1991 .

[13]  Robert L. Greene,et al.  Word Stems as Cues in Recall and Completion Tasks , 1986 .

[14]  John Morton,et al.  The bankruptcy of everyday thinking. , 1991 .

[15]  E. Tulving.  Memory research is not a zero-sum game. , 1991 .

[16]  L. Henry,et al.  Everyday Memory, Actions, and Absent-Mindedness , 1986 .

[17]  Asher Koriat,et al.  Encoding information for future action: Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for to-be-recalled tasks , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Martin A. Conway,et al.  In defense of everyday memory. , 1991 .

[19]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. , 1993, Memory.

[20]  Ulric Neisser.  A case of misplaced nostalgia. , 1991 .

[21]  E. Maylor,et al.  Age and Prospective Memory , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[22]  F. Craik,et al.  Effect of Nonverbal Distraction on Short-Term Storage. , 1973 .

[23]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Normal aging and prospective memory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  H. Roediger.  They read an article? A commentary on the everyday memory controversy. , 1991 .

[25]  L. Kvavilashvili.  Remembering intention as a distinct form of memory , 1987 .

[26]  Elizabeth F. Loftus,et al.  Memory for intentions: The effect of presence of a cue and interpolated activity , 1971 .

[27]  S. R. Schmidt,et al.  Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Carlo Tagliavini,et al.  Lessico di frequenza della lingua Italiana contemporanea , 1972 .

[29]  Judith Spencer Reitman,et al.  Mechanisms of forgetting in short-term memory. , 1971 .

[30]  J. Reitman.  Without surreptitious rehearsal, information in short-term memory decay , 1974 .

[31]  T. Wickens,et al.  Effect of incentive on storage and retrieval processes , 1970 .

[32]  L. R. Peterson,et al.  Concurrent verbal activity. , 1969 .