High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane.

Recent studies show that osmotically driven membrane processes may be a viable technology for desalination, water and wastewater treatment, and power generation. However, the absence of a membrane designed for such processes is a significant obstacle hindering further advancements of this technology. This work presents the development of a high performance thin-film composite membrane for forward osmosis applications. The membrane consists of a selective polyamide active layer formed by interfacial polymerization on top of a polysulfone support layer fabricated by phase separation onto a thin (40 mum) polyester nonwoven fabric. By careful selection of the polysulfone casting solution (i.e., polymer concentration and solvent composition) and tailoring the casting process, we produced a support layer with a mix of finger-like and sponge-like morphologies that give significantly enhanced membrane performance. The structure and performance of the new thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane are compared with those of commercial membranes. Using a 1.5 M NaCl draw solution and a pure water feed, the fabricated membranes produced water fluxes exceeding 18 L m(2-)h(-1), while consistently maintaining observed salt rejection greater than 97%. The high water flux of the fabricated thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes was directly related to the thickness, porosity, tortuosity, and pore structure of the polysulfone support layer. Furthermore, membrane performance did not degrade after prolonged exposure to an ammonium bicarbonate draw solution.

[1]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Performance evaluation of sucrose concentration using forward osmosis , 2009 .

[2]  A. Ghosh,et al.  Impacts of support membrane structure and chemistry on polyamide–polysulfone interfacial composite membranes , 2009 .

[3]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[4]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Global challenges in energy and water supply: the promise of engineered osmosis. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes , 2008 .

[6]  Eric M.V. Hoek,et al.  Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties , 2008 .

[7]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[8]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implications for improved membrane design , 2007 .

[9]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Protein (BSA) fouling of reverse osmosis membranes : Implications for wastewater reclamation , 2007 .

[10]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Removal of natural steroid hormones from wastewater using membrane contactor processes. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[12]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[13]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .

[14]  Michael Flynn,et al.  Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space Part I. Direct osmotic concentration as pretreatment for reverse osmosis , 2005 .

[15]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space: II. Combined direct osmosis, osmotic distillation, and membrane distillation for treatment of metabolic wastewater , 2005 .

[16]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[17]  E. Drioli,et al.  Recent advances on membrane processes for the concentration of fruit juices: a review , 2004 .

[18]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of Crossflow Membrane Filter Geometry and Shear Rate on Colloidal Fouling in Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Separations , 2002 .

[19]  R. Baker.  Membrane Technology and Applications , 1999 .

[20]  C. Hansen.  Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook , 1999 .

[21]  S. Loeb,et al.  Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane , 1997 .

[22]  Jan Feijen,et al.  Phase-Separation Processes in Polymer-Solutions in Relation to Membrane Formation , 1996 .

[23]  R. J. Petersen,et al.  Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 1993 .

[24]  V. Lobo,et al.  Mutual diffusion coefficients in aqueous electrolyte solutions (Technical Report) , 1993 .

[25]  H. Girault.  Basic principles of membrane technology , 1992 .

[26]  Richard E. Kravath,et al.  Desalination of sea water by direct osmosis , 1975 .

[27]  Richard W. Baker,et al.  The formation mechanism of asymmetric membranes , 1975 .

[28]  R. L. Riley,et al.  Kinetic study of the hydrolysis of cellulose acetate in the pH range of 2–10 , 1966 .

[29]  J. E. Cadotte,et al.  A new thin-film composite seawater reverse osmosis membrane , 1980 .