Capacity design of traditional and innovative ductile connections for earthquake-resistant CLT structures

Traditional connections in earthquake-resistant cross-laminated timber buildings are susceptible of brittle failures, even when buildings are designed and supposed to be ductile. This is mainly due to the large underestimation of the actual strength of the ductile components, with consequent increased strength demand for the brittle parts, which may fail if designed with insufficient overstrength. Recent studies demonstrate that the use of steel connections characterized by a well-defined mechanical behaviour can improve significantly ductility and dissipative capacity of cross-laminated timber structures and the reliability of the capacity design. In this paper, the conceptual model of capacity design is discussed, proposing some modifications to improve its reliability for traditional and high-ductility connections for CLT structures. Results from quasi-static cyclic-loading tests of an innovative ductile bracket are presented and the corresponding overstrength factors are computed using the proposed conceptual method and compared with values available in the literature for traditional connections. Finally, a comparative application of the capacity criteria to the design of the innovative bracket and of a traditional nailed connection is presented and discussed.

[1]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[2]  Roberto Scotta,et al.  Experimentally based q -factor estimation of cross-laminated timber walls , 2016 .

[3]  P D Rodd,et al.  High‐performance dowel‐type joints for timber structures , 2003 .

[4]  Pierre Quenneville,et al.  Overstrength of dowelled CLT connections under monotonic and cyclic loading , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[5]  Pouyan Zarnani,et al.  Seismic resistant rocking coupled walls with innovative Resilient Slip Friction (RSF) joints , 2017 .

[6]  Gerhard Schickhofer,et al.  Shaking-table test of a cross-laminated timber structure , 2015 .

[7]  Nawawi Chouw,et al.  Experimental testing of a rocking timber shear wall with slip‐friction connectors , 2014 .

[8]  L. Marchi,et al.  A new dissipative connection for CLT buildings , 2016 .

[9]  Gerhard Schickhofer,et al.  Experimental investigations and design provisions of steel-to-timber joints with annular-ringed shank nails for Cross-Laminated Timber structures , 2016 .

[10]  M. Fragiacomo,et al.  Cyclic behavior of typical screwed connections for cross-laminated (CLT) structures , 2015, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products.

[11]  H. Gulvanessian,et al.  EN1990 Eurocode—Basis of structural design , 2001 .

[12]  Roberto Tomasi,et al.  The new provisions for the seismic design of timber buildings in Europe , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[13]  H. J. Larsen,et al.  DS/ENV 1995-1-1 NAD National Application Document for Eurocode 5: Design of Timber Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 1994 .

[14]  K. W. Johansen,et al.  Theory of Timber Connections , 1949 .

[15]  D. A. Nethercot,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1993-1-1 : Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures : General Rules and Rules for Buildings /L. Gardner and D. A. Nethercot , 2005 .

[16]  Roberto Scotta,et al.  A Dissipative Connector for CLT Buildings: Concept, Design and Testing , 2016, Materials.

[17]  Ricardo O. Foschi,et al.  Load-slip characteristics for connections with common nails , 1977 .

[18]  M. Fragiacomo,et al.  Investigating the Hysteretic Behavior of Cross-Laminated Timber Wall Systems due to Connections , 2018 .

[19]  Roberto Tomasi,et al.  Experimental Characterization of Monotonic and Cyclic Loading Responses of CLT Panel-To-Foundation Angle Bracket Connections , 2015 .

[20]  Massimo Fragiacomo,et al.  Elastic and ductile design of multi-storey crosslam massive wooden buildings under seismic actions , 2011 .

[21]  Gianvittorio Rizzano,et al.  Cyclic Behavior and Modeling of a Dissipative Connector for Cross-Laminated Timber Panel Buildings , 2015 .

[22]  Ario Ceccotti,et al.  New Technologies for Construction of Medium-Rise Buildings in Seismic Regions: The XLAM Case , 2008 .

[23]  Ario Ceccotti,et al.  Cyclic behaviour of typical metal connectors for cross-laminated (CLT) structures , 2015 .

[24]  T. Paulay,et al.  Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings , 1992 .

[25]  A. Jorissen,et al.  General notes on ductility in timber structures , 2011 .

[26]  Daniele Casagrande,et al.  Seismic behaviour of Cross-Laminated Timber structures: A state-of-the-art review , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[27]  Luís Simões da Silva,et al.  Design of Steel Structures: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 2010 .

[28]  Luca Pozza,et al.  An analytical formulation of q-factor for mid-rise CLT buildings based on parametric numerical analyses , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[29]  Sri Sritharan,et al.  Concept and Finite-Element Modeling of New Steel Shear Connectors for Self-Centering Wall Systems , 2010 .

[30]  J. E. Oti,et al.  Design thermal values for unfired clay bricks , 2010 .

[31]  Maurizio Piazza,et al.  An Innovative Connection System for Cross-Laminated Timber Structures , 2017 .