Validation of GRACE Gravity Fields by In-Situ Data of Ocean Bottom Pressure

GRACE observes the temporally changing gravity field of the Earth with unprecedented accuracy. Compared to the gravity signals of the continental hydrological cycle, local ocean mass variability reflecting ocean current, density and sea level changes are a challenge for the GRACE mission. Hence, validation of GRACE with in-situ observations of ocean bottom pressure is critical to evaluate the capability of GRACE to observe oceanic mass redistribution. Here, GRACE data is compared with in-situ ocean bottom pressure at a hundred sites located in all of the world’s oceans. The advances made by recent GRACE product releases are shown, and gravity fields provided from different data centres are compared. In some regions, particularly at high-latitude sites with comparatively strong ocean bottom pressure variability and dense satellite coverage, GRACE captures oceanic variability quite well. This is a robust feature for all gravity field solutions. In contrast, some other regions show remarkably large differences between different GRACE solutions, suggesting that discrepancies in de-aliasing models play a major role in defining the skill of GRACE to realistically observe local oceanic mass variability.

[1]  R. Kwok,et al.  Recent trends in Arctic Ocean mass distribution revealed by GRACE , 2007 .

[2]  S. Speich,et al.  Transport and variability of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current south of Africa , 2008 .

[3]  A. Orsi,et al.  On the meridional extent and fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current , 1995 .

[4]  O. Francis,et al.  Modelling the global ocean tides: modern insights from FES2004 , 2006 .

[5]  S. Swenson,et al.  Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data , 2006 .

[6]  Torsten Mayer-Gürr,et al.  Gravity Field Recovery from GRACE-SST Data of Short Arcs , 2006 .

[7]  Markus Rothacher,et al.  Observation of the Earth system from space , 2006 .

[8]  Guillaume Ramillien,et al.  Comparison of in situ bottom pressure data with GRACE gravimetry in the Crozet‐Kerguelen region , 2006 .

[9]  The Release 04 CHAMP and GRACE EIGEN Gravity Field Models , 2010 .

[10]  S. Jayne,et al.  A comparison of in situ bottom pressure array measurements with GRACE estimates in the Kuroshio Extension , 2008 .

[11]  Peter Schwintzer,et al.  Seasonal variation of ocean bottom pressure derived from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE): Local validation and global patterns , 2005 .

[12]  M. Meredith,et al.  Coherence of Antarctic sea levels, Southern Hemisphere Annular Mode, and flow through Drake Passage , 2003 .

[13]  F. Flechtner,et al.  Improved Non-tidal Atmospheric and Oceanic De-aliasing for GRACE and SLR Satellites , 2010 .

[14]  T. Kanzow Monitoring the integrated deep meridional flow in the tropical North Atlantic , 2006 .

[15]  Jens Schröter,et al.  A pattern‐filtering method for the determination of ocean bottom pressure anomalies from GRACE solutions , 2008 .

[16]  Jean-Charles Marty,et al.  Temporal gravity field models inferred from GRACE data , 2007 .