This paper analyzes how arrangements in the in the mortgage market impact the dynamics of housing (boom-bust episodes) and the economy using a structural equilibrium model with incomplete markets and endogenous adjustment costs. In response to mortgage rates and credit conditions, the model can generate movements in house prices, residential investment, and homeownership consistent with the U.S. housing boom-bust. The propagation to the macroeconomy is asymmetric with much higher consumption sensitivity during the bust than the boom due to the endogenous fragility caused by mortgage debt. Mortgages with adjustable-rate increase the sensitivity of house prices to credit conditions relative to an economy with fixed-rate loans without refinancing. Macro prudential policies can mitigate fragility by reducing the magnitude of house price movements without curtailing homeownership.
[1]
Carlos Garriga,et al.
Mortgage Debt, Consumption, and Illiquid Housing Markets in the Great Recession
,
2017,
American Economic Review.
[2]
Felipe Severino,et al.
Loan Originations and Defaults in the Mortgage Crisis: The Role of the Middle Class
,
2015
.
[3]
Paul Sullivan,et al.
The equilibrium effect of fundamentals on house prices and rents
,
2013
.
[4]
Kyle F. Herkenhoff,et al.
Foreclosure Delay and U.S. Unemployment
,
2012
.
[5]
that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Macroeconomic Effects of Housing Wealth, Housing Finance, and Limited Risk-Sharing in General Equilibrium
,
2010
.
[6]
Shane M. Sherlund,et al.
Making Sense of the Subprime Crisis
,
2008
.
[7]
Morris A. Davis,et al.
The Rent-Price Ratio for the Aggregate Stock of Owner-Occupied Housing
,
2008
.
[8]
Anthony Pennington-Cross,et al.
The Value of Foreclosed Property
,
2004
.
[9]
Chris I. Telmer,et al.
Cyclical Dynamics in Idiosyncratic Labor Market Risk
,
2004,
Journal of Political Economy.