Time-geographic density estimation for home range analysis

This research presents time-geographic density estimation (TGDE) as a new technique of animal home range analysis in geographic information science (GIS). TGDE combines methodologies of time geography and statistical density estimation to produce a continuous probability distribution of an object's spatial position over time. Once TGDE is applied to animal tracking data to create a density surface, home ranges and core areas can be delineated using specified contours of relative intensity (e.g., 95% or 50%). This article explores the use of TGDE for home range analysis using three data sets: a fixed-interval simulated data set and two variable-interval satellite tracks for a loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) corresponding to internesting and post-migration foraging periods. These applications are used to illustrate the influence of several parameters, including sample size, temporal sampling scheme, selected distance-weighted geoellipse function, and specified maximum velocity, on home range estimates. The results demonstrate how TGDE produces reasonable home range estimates even given irregular tracking data with wide temporal gaps. The advantages of TGDE as compared with traditional methods of home range estimation such as kernel density estimation are as follows: (1) intensities are not assigned to locations where the animal could not have been located given space and time constraints; (2) the density surface represents the actual uncertainty about an animal's spatial position during unsampled time periods; (3) the amount of smoothing applied is objectively specified based on the animal's movement velocity rather than arbitrarily chosen; and (4) uneven sampling intervals are easily accommodated since the density estimates are calculated based on the elapsed time between observed locations. In summary, TGDE is a useful method of home range estimation and shows promise for numerous applications to moving objects in GIS.

[1]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  A local nearest-neighbor convex-hull construction of home ranges and utilization distributions , 2004 .

[2]  Kirsi Virrantaus,et al.  Space–time density of trajectories: exploring spatio-temporal patterns in movement data , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  W. Watson,et al.  Endogenous rhythms of locomotion in the American horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus , 2007 .

[4]  W. H. Burt.  Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .

[5]  Michael S. Mitchell,et al.  Estimated home ranges can misrepresent habitat relationships on patchy landscapes , 2008 .

[6]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  Space–time opportunities for multiple agents: a constraint‐based approach , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Robert A. Gitzen,et al.  Bandwidth Selection for Fixed-Kernel Analysis of Animal Utilization Distributions , 2006 .

[8]  Donald G. Janelle,et al.  Geovisualization of Human Activity Patterns Using 3 D GIS : A Time-Geographic Approach , 2002 .

[9]  Anton D. Tucker,et al.  Post-nesting migrations of loggerhead sea turtles in the Gulf of Mexico: dispersal in highly dynamic conditions , 2009 .

[10]  S. Åkesson,et al.  The implications of location accuracy for the interpretation of satellite-tracking data , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Antony Galton,et al.  Efficient generation of simple polygons for characterizing the shape of a set of points in the plane , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[12]  Scott A. Bridwell,et al.  A Field-Based Theory for Time Geography , 2009 .

[13]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  Human Interaction Spaces under Uncertainty , 2007 .

[14]  Klaus H. Hinrichs,et al.  Managing uncertainty in moving objects databases , 2004, TODS.

[15]  T. Hägerstrand.  What about people in Regional Science? , 1970 .

[16]  Mark W. Horner,et al.  Network-based Home Range Analysis Using Delaunay Triangulation , 2007, 4th International Symposium on Voronoi Diagrams in Science and Engineering (ISVD 2007).

[17]  Peter N. Laver,et al.  A Critical Review of Home Range Studies , 2008 .

[18]  Irene Casas,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Identifying Transport-Based Exclusion: A Case Study of Children's Access to Urban Opportunities in Erie and Niagara Counties, New York , 2009 .

[19]  Joni A. Downs,et al.  Time-Geographic Density Estimation for Moving Point Objects , 2010, GIScience.

[20]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Interactive geovisualization of activity-travel patterns using three-dimensional geographical information systems: a methodological exploration with a large data set , 2000 .

[21]  Stephen M. Krone,et al.  Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. , 2007, Ecology.

[22]  John Fieberg,et al.  Kernel density estimators of home range: smoothing and the autocorrelation red herring. , 2007, Ecology.

[23]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Evaluation of Root-n Bandwidth Selectors for Kernel Density Estimation , 2010 .

[24]  H. Johnson,et al.  A comparison of 'traditional' and multimedia information systems development practices , 2003, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[25]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  Are kernels the mustard? Data from global positioning system (GPS) collars suggests problems for kernel home- range analyses with least-squares cross-validation , 2005 .

[26]  SUE K. BATH,et al.  Characterization of Home Range Using Point Peeling Algorithms , 2006 .

[27]  B. Worton.  Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .

[28]  Mark W. Horner,et al.  Effects of Point Pattern Shape on Home-Range Estimates , 2008 .

[29]  E. Debevec,et al.  LINEAR HOME RANGES: EFFECTS OF SMOOTHING, SAMPLE SIZE, AND AUTOCORRELATION ON KERNEL ESTIMATES , 2001 .

[30]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Kernel-based home range method for data with irregular sampling intervals , 2006 .

[31]  H. Miller.  A MEASUREMENT THEORY FOR TIME GEOGRAPHY , 2005 .

[32]  Robert Weibel,et al.  Discovering relative motion patterns in groups of moving point objects , 2005, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[33]  Gary C. White,et al.  Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data , 1990 .

[34]  Torsten Hägerstraand.  WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[35]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Necessary Space—Time Conditions for Human Interaction , 2005 .

[36]  J. Row,et al.  Kernels Are Not Accurate Estimators of Home-range Size for Herpetofauna , 2006, Copeia.

[37]  C. O. Mohr,et al.  Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals , 1947 .

[38]  Anton D. Tucker,et al.  Nest site fidelity and clutch frequency of loggerhead turtles are better elucidated by satellite telemetry than by nocturnal tagging efforts: Implications for stock estimation , 2010 .

[39]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[40]  Mark W. Horner,et al.  A Characteristic‐Hull Based Method for Home Range Estimation , 2009, Trans. GIS.

[41]  B. Godley,et al.  Satellite Tracking and Analysis Tool (STAT): an integrated system for archiving, analyzing and mapping animal tracking data , 2005 .

[42]  Robert A. Gitzen,et al.  Analysis of Animal Space Use and Movements , 2001 .

[43]  Matthew H. Godfrey,et al.  Satellite tracking of sea turtles: Where have we been and where do we go next? , 2008 .