The next level in chemical space navigation: going far beyond enumerable compound libraries.

Recent innovations have brought pharmacophore-driven methods for navigating virtual chemical spaces, the size of which can reach into the billions of molecules, to the fingertips of every chemist. There has been a paradigm shift in the underlying computational chemistry that drives chemical space search applications, incorporating intelligent reaction knowledge into their core so that they can readily deliver commercially available molecules as nearest neighbor hits from within giant virtual spaces. These vast resources enable medicinal chemists to execute rapid scaffold-hopping experiments, rapid hit expansion, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) exploitation in largely intellectual property (IP)-free territory and at unparalleled low cost.

[1]  Jean-Louis Reymond,et al.  MQN-Mapplet: Visualization of Chemical Space with Interactive Maps of DrugBank, ChEMBL, PubChem, GDB-11, and GDB-13 , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[2]  Markus Hartenfeller,et al.  DOGS: Reaction-Driven de novo Design of Bioactive Compounds , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  Michael M. Hann,et al.  RECAP-Retrosynthetic Combinatorial Analysis Procedure: A Powerful New Technique for Identifying Privileged Molecular Fragments with Useful Applications in Combinatorial Chemistry , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[4]  Jonas Boström,et al.  Expanding the medicinal chemistry synthetic toolbox , 2018, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[5]  Joe Zhongxiang Zhou,et al.  Pfizer Global Virtual Library (PGVL): a chemistry design tool powered by experimentally validated parallel synthesis information. , 2012, ACS combinatorial science.

[6]  John J. Irwin,et al.  ZINC 15 – Ligand Discovery for Everyone , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[7]  Stefan Günther,et al.  The Purchasable Chemical Space: A Detailed Picture , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[8]  Matthias Rarey,et al.  Feature trees: A new molecular similarity measure based on tree matching , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[9]  Florent Chevillard,et al.  SCUBIDOO: A Large yet Screenable and Easily Searchable Database of Computationally Created Chemical Compounds Optimized toward High Likelihood of Synthetic Tractability , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[10]  Gavin Williams,et al.  Cheminformatics-based enumeration and analysis of large libraries of macrolide scaffolds , 2018, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[11]  Uta Lessel,et al.  Identification of new potent GPR119 agonists by combining virtual screening and combinatorial chemistry. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[12]  Matthias Rarey,et al.  On the Art of Compiling and Using 'Drug‐Like' Chemical Fragment Spaces , 2008, ChemMedChem.

[13]  Karina Martinez-Mayorga,et al.  Balancing novelty with confined chemical space in modern drug discovery , 2014, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[14]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018 , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  Petra Mutzel,et al.  CHIPMUNK: A Virtual Synthesizable Small‐Molecule Library for Medicinal Chemistry, Exploitable for Protein–Protein Interaction Modulators , 2018, ChemMedChem.

[16]  Matthias Rarey,et al.  FlexNovo: Structure‐Based Searching in Large Fragment Spaces , 2006, ChemMedChem.

[17]  W. Guida,et al.  The art and practice of structure‐based drug design: A molecular modeling perspective , 1996, Medicinal research reviews.

[18]  Asher Mullard,et al.  The drug-maker's guide to the galaxy , 2017, Nature.

[19]  Jean-Louis Reymond,et al.  Enumeration of 166 Billion Organic Small Molecules in the Chemical Universe Database GDB-17 , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[20]  Denis Khachko,et al.  A very large diversity space of synthetically accessible compounds for use with drug design programs , 2005, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[21]  Taraneh Mirzadegan,et al.  Structural Basis of Small-Molecule Aggregate Induced Inhibition of a Protein-Protein Interaction. , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[22]  Martin Pouliot,et al.  Pan Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS) and Other Promiscuous Compounds in Antifungal Research. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[23]  D Rognan,et al.  Towards the Next Generation of Computational Chemogenomics Tools , 2013, Molecular informatics.

[24]  Matthias Rarey,et al.  Similarity searching in large combinatorial chemistry spaces , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[25]  Anthony Wood,et al.  Organic synthesis provides opportunities to transform drug discovery , 2018, Nature Chemistry.

[26]  J. A. Grant,et al.  A shape-based 3-D scaffold hopping method and its application to a bacterial protein-protein interaction. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  Christian Lemmen,et al.  Similarity searching and scaffold hopping in synthetically accessible combinatorial chemistry spaces. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[28]  Gabriele Bassi,et al.  DNA‐encoded chemical libraries – achievements and remaining challenges , 2018, FEBS letters.

[29]  Florent Chevillard,et al.  Virtual Compound Libraries in Computer-Assisted Drug Discovery , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[30]  Holger Claussen,et al.  Searching Fragment Spaces with Feature Trees , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[31]  Thierry Kogej,et al.  Generating Focused Molecule Libraries for Drug Discovery with Recurrent Neural Networks , 2017, ACS central science.

[32]  J. Baell,et al.  New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  José L. Medina-Franco,et al.  Chemical Space and Diversity of the NuBBE Database: A Chemoinformatic Characterization. , 2018, Journal of chemical information and modeling.

[34]  Thomas Kodadek,et al.  The rise, fall and reinvention of combinatorial chemistry. , 2011, Chemical communications.

[35]  W. P. Walters,et al.  Virtual Chemical Libraries. , 2018, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[36]  Schmid,et al.  "Scaffold-Hopping" by Topological Pharmacophore Search: A Contribution to Virtual Screening. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[37]  R. Lerner,et al.  Encoded combinatorial chemistry. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Jean-Louis Reymond,et al.  Visualization and Virtual Screening of the Chemical Universe Database GDB-17 , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[39]  Mike Preuss,et al.  Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI , 2017, Nature.

[40]  Ji-Bo Wang,et al.  The Proximal Lilly Collection: Mapping, Exploring and Exploiting Feasible Chemical Space , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..