As the member making many of the most visible contributions to NATO, the USA has often claimed that they shoulder the heaviest ‘burden’ in maintaining the objectives of the alliance. This claim has been backed by research which has concentrated on contributions such as defence expenditure and benefits such as protection from external threats. However, modern alliances entail the exchange of multiple forms of alliance benefits and liabilities and therefore the study of ‘burden-sharing’ in these alliances is a more complicated accounting problem than has been acknowledged by previous research. In this paper, burden-sharing is studied using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This is a novel application of DEA. Instead of calculating relative ‘efficiencies’, the analysis produces a ‘net-burden index’ for each member nation of NATO. The results of the analysis indicate that whilst the USA shoulders a heavy burden, some other member nations, including Canada and Spain, may in fact shoulder a heavier burden.
[1]
Abraham Charnes,et al.
Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
,
1978
.
[2]
T. R. Nunamaker,et al.
Using data envelopment analysis to measure the efficiency of non‐profit organizations: A critical evaluation
,
1985
.
[3]
Michael Norman,et al.
Data Envelopment Analysis: The Assessment of Performance
,
1991
.
[4]
M. Lorr.
Cluster analysis for social scientists
,
1938
.
[5]
Linda Hendry,et al.
Seeking new perspectives in NATO burden‐sharing
,
1995
.
[6]
J. D. Morrow.
Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of Alliances
,
1991
.
[7]
Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.
Relative Efficiency Assessments Using Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Data on Rates Departments
,
1987
.