Optimization of Physical Dose Distributions with Hadron Beams: Comparing Photon IMRT with IMPT

Intensity modulated radiotherapy with high enengy photons (IMRT) and with charged particles (IMPT) refer to the most advanced development in conformal radiation therapy. Their general aim is to increase local tumor control rates while keeping the radiation induced complications below desired thresholds. IMRT is currently widely introduced in clinical practice. However, the more complicated IMPT is still under development. Especially, spot-scanning techniques integrated in rotating gantries that can deliver proton or light ion-beams to a radiation target from any direction will be available in the near future. We describe the basic concepts of intensity modulated particle therapy (IMPT). Starting from the potential advantages of hadron therapy inverse treatment planning strategies are discussed for various dose delivery techniques of IMPT. Of special interest are the techniques of distal edge tracking (DET) and 3D-scanning. After the introduction of these concepts a study of comparative inverse treatment planning is presented. The study aims to identify the potential advantages of achievable physical dose distributions with proton and carbon beams, if different dose delivery techniques are employed. Moreover, a comparison to standard photon IMRT is performed. The results of the study are summarized as: i) IMRT with photon beams is a strong competitor to intensity modulated radiotherapy with charged particles. The most obvious benefit observed for charged particles is the reduction of medium and low doses in organs at risk. ii) The 3D-scanning technique could not improve the dosimetric results achieved with DET, although 10–15 times more beam spots were employed for 3D-scanning than for DET. However, concerns may arise about the application of DET, if positioning errors of the patient or organ movements have to be accounted for. iii) Replacing protons with carbon ions leads to further improvements of the physical dose distributions. However, the additional degree of improvement due to carbon ions is modest. The main clinical potential of heavy ion beams is probably related to their radiobiological properties.

[1]  P. Petti,et al.  Differential-pencil-beam dose calculations for charged particles. , 1992, Medical physics.

[2]  U Oelfke,et al.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy with charged particle beams: studies of inverse treatment planning for rotation therapy. , 2000, Medical physics.

[3]  T LoSasso,et al.  Testing of dynamic multileaf collimation. , 1996, Medical physics.

[4]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  A new planning tool for IMRT treatments: Implementation and first application for proton beams , 2000 .

[5]  W Schlegel,et al.  Dynamic X-ray compensation for conformal radiotherapy by means of multi-leaf collimation. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  U. Isacsson,et al.  Comparative treatment planning between proton and X-ray therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. , 1996, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[7]  A. Lomax,et al.  Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  J. Alonso.  Review of ion beam therapy: Present and Future , 2000 .

[9]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  The role of proton therapy in the treatment of large irradiation volumes: a comparative planning study of pancreatic and biliary tumors. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  J M Galvin,et al.  Combining multileaf fields to modulate fluence distributions. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  G. Kraft,et al.  Tumor therapy with heavy charged particles , 2000 .

[12]  S. Spirou,et al.  Generation of arbitrary intensity profiles by dynamic jaws or multileaf collimators. , 1994, Medical physics.

[13]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Decomposition of pencil beam kernels for fast dose calculations in three-dimensional treatment planning. , 1993, Medical physics.

[14]  C De Wagter,et al.  Planning and delivering high doses to targets surrounding the spinal cord at the lower neck and upper mediastinal levels: static beam-segmentation technique executed with a multileaf collimator. , 1996, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  C. Haie-meder,et al.  How can laparoscopic management assist radiation treatment in cervix carcinoma? , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  M Goitein,et al.  A pencil beam algorithm for proton dose calculations. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  R Miralbell,et al.  Potential role of intensity modulated proton beams in prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  R Svensson,et al.  An analytical solution for the dynamic control of multileaf collimators. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  D L McShan,et al.  A computer-controlled conformal radiotherapy system. I: Overview. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  R B Shira,et al.  Treatment planning. , 1970, Journal of oral surgery.

[21]  D. Schardt,et al.  Magnetic scanning system for heavy ion therapy , 1993 .

[23]  U Isacsson,et al.  Implementation of pencil kernel and depth penetration algorithms for treatment planning of proton beams. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  A J Lomax,et al.  A treatment planning inter-comparison of proton and intensity modulated photon radiotherapy. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  P. Xia,et al.  Multileaf collimator leaf sequencing algorithm for intensity modulated beams with multiple static segments. , 1998, Medical physics.

[26]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Inverse planning for photon and proton beams. , 2001, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[27]  R Miralbell,et al.  Optimizing radiotherapy of orbital and paraorbital tumors: intensity-modulated X-ray beams vs. intensity-modulated proton beams. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  C. Yu,et al.  A method for implementing dynamic photon beam intensity modulation using independent jaws and a multileaf collimator. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  T Bortfeld,et al.  Optimized planning using physical objectives and constraints. , 1999, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[30]  U. Isacsson,et al.  Comparative treatment planning between proton and x-ray therapy in esophageal cancer. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  U Isacsson,et al.  Potential advantages of protons over conventional radiation beams for paraspinal tumours. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[32]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.