A Global Sensitivity Analysis of Commonly Used Satellite-Derived Vegetation Indices for Homogeneous Canopies Based on Model Simulation and Random Forest Learning

Remote sensing (RS) provides operational monitoring of terrestrial vegetation. For optical RS, vegetation information is generally derived from surface reflectance (ρ). More generally, vegetation indices (VIs) are built on the basis of ρ as proxies for vegetation traits. At canopy level, ρ can be affected by a variety of factors, including leaf constituents, canopy structure, background reflectivity, and sun-sensor geometry. Consequently, VIs are mixtures of different information. In this study, a global sensitivity analysis (GSA) is made for several commonly used satellite-derived VIs in order to better understand the application of these VIs at large scales. The sensitivities of VIs to different parameters are analyzed on the basis of PROSPECT-SAIL (PROSAIL) radiative transfer model simulations, which apply for homogeneous canopies, and random forest (RF) learning. Specifically, combined factors such as canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) and canopy water content (CWC) are introduced in the RF-based GSA. We find that for most VIs, the leaf area index is the most influential factor, while the broad-band sensor-derived enhanced VI (EVI) exhibits a strong sensitivity to CCC, and the universal normalized VI (UNVI) is sensitive to CWC. The potential and uncertainty for the application of all the considered VIs are analyzed according to the GSA results. The results can help to improve the use of VIs in different contexts, and the RF-based GSA method can be further applied in more sophisticated situations.

[1]  Lifu Zhang,et al.  Monitoring vegetation dynamics using the universal normalized vegetation index (UNVI): An optimized vegetation index-VIUPD , 2019, Remote Sensing Letters.

[2]  Qingxi Tong,et al.  Derivation of a tasselled cap transformation based on Landsat 8 at-satellite reflectance , 2014 .

[3]  J. Ardö,et al.  Spatio‐Temporal Convergence of Maximum Daily Light‐Use Efficiency Based on Radiation Absorption by Canopy Chlorophyll , 2018 .

[4]  M. Schlerf,et al.  Inversion of a forest reflectance model to estimate structural canopy variables from hyperspectral remote sensing data , 2006 .

[5]  Le Yu,et al.  Assessing spectral indices to estimate the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the vegetation canopy , 2018, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

[6]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Hyperspectral remote sensing of foliar nitrogen content , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Remote estimation of crop gross primary production with Landsat data , 2012 .

[8]  Hua Yu,et al.  Canopy-Level Photochemical Reflectance Index from Hyperspectral Remote Sensing and Leaf-Level Non-Photochemical Quenching as Early Indicators of Water Stress in Maize , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Flavio Cannavó,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for volcanic source modeling quality assessment and model selection , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[10]  E. Davidson,et al.  Satellite-based modeling of gross primary production in an evergreen needleleaf forest , 2004 .

[11]  J. Dash,et al.  The MERIS terrestrial chlorophyll index , 2004 .

[12]  Lifu Zhang,et al.  A new vegetation index based on the universal pattern decomposition method , 2007 .

[13]  J. Moreno,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis of the SCOPE model: What drives simulated canopy-leaving sun-induced fluorescence? , 2015 .

[14]  Clement Atzberger,et al.  Model-Based Optimization of Spectral Sampling for the Retrieval of Crop Variables with the PROSAIL Model , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[15]  Uwe Rascher,et al.  Combining Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photochemical Reflectance Index Improves Diurnal Modeling of Gross Primary Productivity , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[16]  Gustau Camps-Valls,et al.  Quantifying Vegetation Biophysical Variables from Imaging Spectroscopy Data: A Review on Retrieval Methods , 2018, Surveys in Geophysics.

[17]  Qing Chang,et al.  Evaluating an Enhanced Vegetation Condition Index (VCI) Based on VIUPD for Drought Monitoring in the Continental United States , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[18]  L. Guanter,et al.  Downscaling of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from canopy level to photosystem level using a random forest model , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[19]  W. Verhoef,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis of the spectral radiance of a soil-vegetation system , 2014 .

[20]  Jinwei Dong,et al.  A global moderate resolution dataset of gross primary production of vegetation for 2000–2016 , 2017, Scientific Data.

[21]  C. Field,et al.  A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency , 1992 .

[22]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[23]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  Remote estimation of gross primary productivity in soybean and maize based on total crop chlorophyll content , 2012 .

[24]  D. Diner,et al.  Estimation of vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation from atmosphere‐corrected MISR data , 1998 .

[25]  Lixin Wang,et al.  A new multi-sensor integrated index for drought monitoring , 2017, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[26]  S. Ollinger Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[27]  Chaoyang Wu,et al.  Gross primary production estimation from MODIS data with vegetation index and photosynthetically active radiation in maize , 2010 .

[28]  C. Tucker Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[29]  Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry,et al.  DART: a 3D model for simulating satellite images and studying surface radiation budget , 2004 .

[30]  W. Verhoef,et al.  An integrated model of soil-canopy spectral radiances, photosynthesis, fluorescence, temperature and energy balance , 2009 .

[31]  Jochem Verrelst,et al.  Quantifying the Robustness of Vegetation Indices through Global Sensitivity Analysis of Homogeneous and Forest Leaf-Canopy Radiative Transfer Models , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[32]  C. Field,et al.  Canopy near-infrared reflectance and terrestrial photosynthesis , 2017, Science Advances.

[33]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  The fourth phase of the radiative transfer model intercomparison (RAMI) exercise: Actual canopy scenarios and conformity testing , 2015 .

[34]  Weimin Ju,et al.  Retrieving leaf chlorophyll content using a matrix-based vegetation index combination approach , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[35]  Lifu Zhang,et al.  Comparison of the Continuity of Vegetation Indices Derived from Landsat 8 OLI and Landsat 7 ETM+ Data among Different Vegetation Types , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[36]  Timothy Arkebauer,et al.  Efficiency of chlorophyll in gross primary productivity: A proof of concept and application in crops. , 2016, Journal of plant physiology.

[37]  Bing Zhang,et al.  An evaluation of the effect of the spectral response function of satellite sensors on the precision of the universal pattern decomposition method , 2010 .

[38]  Q. Tong,et al.  Studying drought phenomena in the Continental United States in 2011 and 2012 using various drought indices , 2017 .

[39]  Jorge Vicent,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis of Leaf-Canopy-Atmosphere RTMs: Implications for Biophysical Variables Retrieval from Top-of-Atmosphere Radiance Data , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[40]  A. Huete,et al.  Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices , 2002 .