Socially mediated induction and suppression of antibiosis during bacterial coexistence

Significance Antibiotics have profoundly changed human medicine, yet we know surprisingly little about the role of antibiotics in nature for the bacteria that produce them. Here we examine antibiotic use in the prolific antibiotic-producing genus Streptomyces across divergent social and competitive growth conditions. Our results provide clear experimental evidence that antibiotics are weapons whose use is strongly modified by intermicrobial social interactions. Simultaneously, using experiments and computer simulations, we show that social and competitive dynamics between bacteria have a crucial and previously unrecognized influence on the maintenance of microbial diversity in soil environments. These insights have implications for both bacterial coexistence and diversity and also for drug discovery. Despite their importance for humans, there is little consensus on the function of antibiotics in nature for the bacteria that produce them. Classical explanations suggest that bacteria use antibiotics as weapons to kill or inhibit competitors, whereas a recent alternative hypothesis states that antibiotics are signals that coordinate cooperative social interactions between coexisting bacteria. Here we distinguish these hypotheses in the prolific antibiotic-producing genus Streptomyces and provide strong evidence that antibiotics are weapons whose expression is significantly influenced by social and competitive interactions between competing strains. We show that cells induce facultative responses to cues produced by competitors by (i) increasing their own antibiotic production, thereby decreasing costs associated with constitutive synthesis of these expensive products, and (ii) by suppressing antibiotic production in competitors, thereby reducing direct threats to themselves. These results thus show that although antibiotic production is profoundly social, it is emphatically not cooperative. Using computer simulations, we next show that these facultative strategies can facilitate the maintenance of biodiversity in a community context by converting lethal interactions between neighboring colonies to neutral interactions where neither strain excludes the other. Thus, just as bacteriocins can lead to increased diversity via rock–paper–scissors dynamics, so too can antibiotics via elicitation and suppression. Our results reveal that social interactions are crucial for understanding antibiosis and bacterial community dynamics, and highlight the potential of interbacterial interactions for novel drug discovery by eliciting pathways that mediate interference competition.

[1]  G. V. van Wezel,et al.  Feast or famine: the global regulator DasR links nutrient stress to antibiotic production by Streptomyces , 2008, EMBO reports.

[2]  J. Farrar,et al.  Policy: An intergovernmental panel on antimicrobial resistance , 2014, Nature.

[3]  D. Stevens,et al.  Impact of antibiotics on expression of virulence-associated exotoxin genes in methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. , 2007, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[4]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. , 2007, Ecology.

[5]  A. Griffin,et al.  Evolutionary theory of bacterial quorum sensing: when is a signal not a signal? , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  K. Lewis,et al.  A new antibiotic kills pathogens without detectable resistance , 2015, Nature.

[7]  K. Foster,et al.  Competition, Not Cooperation, Dominates Interactions among Culturable Microbial Species , 2012, Current Biology.

[8]  Daniel M. Cornforth,et al.  Competition sensing: the social side of bacterial stress responses , 2013, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[9]  R. Kolter,et al.  Antibiotics as signal molecules. , 2011, Chemical reviews.

[10]  Shane S. Sturrock,et al.  Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data , 2012, Bioinform..

[11]  T. Czárán,et al.  Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  S. Brady,et al.  Global biogeographic sampling of bacterial secondary metabolism , 2015, eLife.

[13]  J. Bérdy Thoughts and facts about antibiotics: Where we are now and where we are heading , 2012, The Journal of Antibiotics.

[14]  Michael J. MacCoss,et al.  Aminoglycoside antibiotics induce bacterial biofilm formation , 2005, Nature.

[15]  G. Kowalchuk,et al.  Micro-scale determinants of bacterial diversity in soil. , 2013, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[16]  W. Ratcliff,et al.  Alternative Actions for Antibiotics , 2011, Science.

[17]  M. Feldman,et al.  Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors , 2002, Nature.

[18]  Ramón Doallo,et al.  CircadiOmics: integrating circadian genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics , 2012, Nature Methods.

[19]  Gilles P van Wezel,et al.  The regulation of the secondary metabolism of Streptomyces: new links and experimental advances. , 2011, Natural product reports.

[20]  F. Baquero,et al.  Antibiotics as intermicrobial signaling agents instead of weapons , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J. Davies,et al.  The truth about antibiotics. , 2006, International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM.

[22]  G. V. van Wezel,et al.  A novel taxonomic marker that discriminates between morphologically complex actinomycetes , 2013, Open Biology.

[23]  S. Diggle,et al.  Rules of engagement: defining bacterial communication. , 2012, Current opinion in microbiology.

[24]  Roy Kishony,et al.  Structure and Evolution of Streptomyces Interaction Networks in Soil and In Silico , 2011, PLoS biology.

[25]  J. Davies,et al.  The world of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations. , 2006, Current opinion in microbiology.

[26]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees , 2001, Bioinform..

[27]  P. Dorrestein,et al.  Interspecies Interactions Stimulate Diversification of the Streptomyces coelicolor Secreted Metabolome , 2013, mBio.

[28]  M. Mazzola,et al.  Diversity and natural functions of antibiotics produced by beneficial and plant pathogenic bacteria. , 2012, Annual review of phytopathology.

[29]  J. Davies,et al.  Origins and Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance , 1996, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[30]  P. Garbeva,et al.  Impact of interspecific interactions on antimicrobial activity among soil bacteria , 2014, Front. Microbiol..

[31]  J. Martínez,et al.  Antibiotics as signals that trigger specific bacterial responses. , 2008, Current opinion in microbiology.

[32]  D. Schlatter,et al.  Sympatric inhibition and niche differentiation suggest alternative coevolutionary trajectories among Streptomycetes , 2013, The ISME Journal.

[33]  M. Bibb,et al.  Genome-wide dynamics of a bacterial response to antibiotics that target the cell envelope , 2011, BMC Genomics.

[34]  Eric D. Kelsic,et al.  Counteraction of antibiotic production and degradation stabilizes microbial communities , 2015, Nature.

[35]  Hua Zhu,et al.  Triggers and cues that activate antibiotic production by actinomycetes , 2014, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[36]  A. Griffin,et al.  The Social Lives of Microbes , 2007 .