Legal Transplants: Applying Arms Control Frameworks to Autonomous Weapons

The Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocols that regulate the law of armed conflict are insufficient to interpret autonomous weapon systems, which are among the modern weapon technologies that will be actively used by armies in the near future. This article focuses on autonomous weapon systems, which are not yet subject to regulation in terms of international law and which are still under debate with regard to prohibition in the global arena, and examines whether they can be an alternative for autonomous weapon systems by examining the regulations previously prepared on landmines, incendiary weapons, and cluster munitions through legal transplants. As a result of the conclusions reached in the article, recommendations will be shared on the content and legal status of the international humanitarian law manuals that should be prepared for autonomous weapon systems.

[1]  Ozlem Ulgen,et al.  Human Dignity in an Age of Autonomous Weapons: Are We in Danger of Losing an ‘Elementary Consideration of Humanity’? , 2020 .

[2]  Jean-François Caron,et al.  Defining semi-autonomous, automated and autonomous weapon systems in order to understand their ethical challenges , 2020, Digital War.

[3]  Francis Grimal,et al.  Combat Drones: Hives, Swarms, and Autonomous Action? , 2018 .

[4]  M. Shaw.  International Law by Malcolm N. Shaw , 2017 .

[5]  Jae Sundaram,et al.  Cyber warfare and autonomous self-defence , 2017 .

[6]  John Salvatier,et al.  When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts , 2017, ArXiv.

[7]  Rebecca Crootof,et al.  Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Limits of Analogy , 2016 .

[8]  Kjølv Egeland.  Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems under International Humanitarian Law , 2016 .

[9]  Thompson Chengeta,et al.  Defining the Emerging Notion of ‘Meaningful Human Control’ in Autonomous Weapon Systems (AWS) 2016 , 2016 .

[10]  Sean Watts,et al.  Autonomous Weapons: Regulation Tolerant or Regulation Resistant? , 2015 .

[11]  Thompson Chengeta,et al.  Accountability Gap, Autonomous Weapon Systems and Modes of Responsibility in International Law , 2015 .

[12]  J. Boogaard.  Proportionality and Autonomous Weapons Systems , 2015 .

[13]  E. Lieblich,et al.  The Obligation to Exercise Discretion in Warfare: Why Autonomous Weapon Systems are Unlawful , 2014 .

[14]  Heather Roff,et al.  The Strategic Robot Problem: Lethal Autonomous Weapons in War , 2014 .

[15]  J. Altmann.  Arms control for armed uninhabited vehicles: an ethical issue , 2013, Ethics and Information Technology.

[16]  Matthew C. Waxman,et al.  Law and Ethics for Autonomous Weapon Systems: Why a Ban Won't Work and How the Laws of War Can , 2013 .

[17]  Michael N. Schmitt,et al.  Autonomous Weapon Systems and International Humanitarian Law: A Reply to the Critics , 2012 .

[18]  Alan Bryden,et al.  International Law, Politics and Inhumane Weapons: The Effectiveness of Global Landmine Regimes , 2012 .

[19]  Alexander Breitegger,et al.  Cluster Munitions and International Law: Disarmament With a Human Face? , 2011 .

[20]  Bonnie Docherty.  Breaking New Ground: The Convention on Cluster Munitions and the Evolution of International Humanitarian Law , 2009 .

[21]  Sean Watts,et al.  Tallinn Manual on the International Law applicable to Cyber Warfare: prepared by the International Group of Experts at the Invitation of the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence , 2017 .

[22]  Jeffrey S. Thurnher.  Examining Autonomous Weapon Systems from a Law of Armed Conflict Perspective , 2014 .