Sharing decisions in breast cancer care: Development of the Decision Analysis System for Oncology (DAS‐O) to identify shared decision making during treatment consultations

Background  Shared Decision Making (SDM) is widely accepted as the preferred method for reaching treatment decisions in the oncology setting including those about clinical trial participation: however, there is some disagreement between researchers over the components of SDM. Specific standardized coding systems are needed to help overcome this difficulty.

[1]  P. Butow,et al.  Developing ethical strategies to assist oncologists in seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[2]  M. Gleason,et al.  Influence of clinical communication on patients' decision making on participation in clinical trials. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  H. Llewellyn-Thomas,et al.  Cancer Patients' Decision Making and Trial-entry Preferences , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[4]  W. Levinson,et al.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. , 1999, JAMA.

[5]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[6]  J. Boan,et al.  Strained mercy : the economics of Canadian health care , 1985 .

[7]  C. Charles,et al.  Doing Nothing is No Choice: Lay Constructions of Treatment Decision‐making Among Women with Early‐stage Breast Cancer , 1998 .

[8]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The basics of communication research , 2012 .

[9]  T. Marmor.  Strained Mercy: The Economics of Canadian Health Care, by Robert G. Evans , 1986 .

[10]  Dawn Stacey,et al.  Validation of a tool to assess health practitioners' decision support and communication skills. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.

[11]  C. Bylund,et al.  Communication Skills Training: Describing a New Conceptual Model , 2008, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[12]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[13]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Evaluating Interventions to Promote Patient Involvement in Decision-Making: By What Criteria Should Effectiveness be Judged? , 1998, Journal of health services research & policy.

[14]  Gregory Makoul,et al.  An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[15]  P. Butow,et al.  Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials: describing current practice. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[16]  W Godolphin,et al.  Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. , 1999, BMJ.

[17]  C. Charles,et al.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[18]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[19]  Suzanne Eggins,et al.  An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics , 1994 .

[20]  P. Butow,et al.  Sharing decisions in cancer care. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[21]  Dawn Stacey,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of an intervention to implement evidence-based patient decision support in a nursing call centre , 2006, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[22]  C Duffield,et al.  The Delphi technique. , 1988, The Australian journal of advanced nursing : a quarterly publication of the Royal Australian Nursing Federation.

[23]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[24]  R. Souhami,et al.  Attitudes of patients to randomised clinical trials of cancer therapy. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[25]  P. Butow,et al.  Seeking informed consent to cancer clinical trials; evaluating the efficacy of doctor communication skills training , 2007, Psycho-oncology.