High-accuracy individual identification using a “thin slice” of the functional connectome

Connectome fingerprinting—a method that uses many thousands of functional connections in aggregate to identify individuals—holds promise for individualized neuroimaging. A better characterization of the features underlying successful fingerprinting performance—how many and which functional connections are necessary and/or sufficient for high accuracy—will further inform our understanding of uniqueness in brain functioning. Thus, here we examine the limits of high-accuracy individual identification from functional connectomes. Using ∼3,300 scans from the Human Connectome Project in a split-half design and an independent replication sample, we find that a remarkably small “thin slice” of the connectome—as few as 40 out of 64,620 functional connections—was sufficient to uniquely identify individuals. Yet, we find that no specific connections or even specific networks were necessary for identification, as even small random samples of the connectome were sufficient. These results have important conceptual and practical implications for the manifestation and detection of uniqueness in the brain. Author Summary Patterns of functional connectivity are so distinct between different people that they can be used to predict individual identity with high accuracy. Here, we show that a strikingly small fraction of the functional connectome is actually needed to predict individual identity (as few as 40 functional connections from 64,620). We further show that although certain functional connections may be most informative, even small fractions of the connectome selected at random can be used to identify individuals, and that no specific connections or even networks are actually necessary. The results indicate that uniquely identifying signatures of brain functioning are widely distributed throughout the brain and can be detected in a much more compact manner than previously appreciated.

[1]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  The quest for identifiability in human functional connectomes , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[2]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[4]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Evaluation of Denoising Strategies to Address Motion-Correlated Artifacts in Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data from the Human Connectome Project , 2016, Brain Connect..

[5]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  Individual differences in functional connectivity during naturalistic viewing conditions , 2016, NeuroImage.

[6]  Daniel P. Kennedy,et al.  Enhancing studies of the connectome in autism using the autism brain imaging data exchange II , 2017, Scientific Data.

[7]  Theo G. M. van Erp,et al.  Multisite reliability of MR-based functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[8]  Joaquín Goñi,et al.  Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain , 2015, Neuron.

[11]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Spatiotemporal Network Markers of Individual Variability in the Human Functional Connectome , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Can brain state be manipulated to emphasize individual differences in functional connectivity? , 2017, NeuroImage.

[13]  Johann Daniel Kruschwitz,et al.  Evaluating the replicability, specificity, and generalizability of connectome fingerprints , 2017, NeuroImage.

[14]  Raag D. Airan,et al.  Factors affecting characterization and localization of interindividual differences in functional connectivity using MRI , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[15]  M. Seghier,et al.  Interpreting and Utilising Intersubject Variability in Brain Function , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[17]  Damien A. Fair,et al.  Connectotyping: Model Based Fingerprinting of the Functional Connectome , 2014, PloS one.

[18]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation , 2018, Neuron.

[19]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Mary E. Meyerand,et al.  The effect of scan length on the reliability of resting-state fMRI connectivity estimates , 2013, NeuroImage.

[21]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[22]  Lisa Byrge,et al.  Identifying and characterizing systematic temporally-lagged BOLD artifacts , 2017, NeuroImage.

[23]  M. Fox,et al.  Individual Variability in Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[24]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Considering factors affecting the connectome-based identification process: Comment on Waller et al. , 2018, NeuroImage.

[25]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[27]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Influences on the Test–Retest Reliability of Functional Connectivity MRI and its Relationship with Behavioral Utility , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[29]  Oscar Miranda-Dominguez,et al.  Heritability of the human connectome: A connectotyping study , 2017, Network Neuroscience.

[30]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[31]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  The relationship between spatial configuration and functional connectivity of brain regions , 2017, bioRxiv.

[32]  Noah D. Brenowitz,et al.  Whole-brain, time-locked activation with simple tasks revealed using massive averaging and model-free analysis , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.