The Development of a Mobile Monitoring and Feedback Tool to Stimulate Physical Activity of People With a Chronic Disease in Primary Care: A User-Centered Design

Background Physical activity is an important aspect in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or type-2 diabetes. A monitoring and feedback tool combined with guidance by a primary care provider might be a successful method to enhance the level of physical activity in these patients. As a prerequisite for useful technology, it is important to involve the end-users in the design process from an early stage. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the user requirements for a tool to stimulate physical activity, embedded in primary care practice. The leading principle of this tool is to change behavior by self-monitoring, goal-setting, and feedback. Methods The research team collected qualitative data among 15 patients, 16 care professionals, and several experts. A prototype was developed in three stages. In stage 1, the literature was searched to identify end-users and context. In stage 2, the literature, experts and patient representatives were consulted to set up a use case with the general idea of the innovation. In stage 3, individual interviews and focus groups were held to identify the end-user requirements. Based on these requirements a prototype was built by the engineering team. Results The development process has led to a tool that generally meets the requirements of the end-users. A tri-axial activity sensor, worn on the hip, is connected by Bluetooth to a smartphone. In an app, quantitative feedback is given about the amount of activity and goals reached by means of graphical visualization, and an image shows a sun when the goal is reached. Overviews about activity per half an hour, per day, week, and month are provided. In the menu of the app and on a secured website, patients can enter information in individual sessions or read feedback messages generated by the system. The practice nurse can see the results of all patients on a secure webpage and can then discuss the results and set personalized goals in consultation with the patient. Conclusions This study demonstrates that a user-centered approach brings in valuable details (such as the requirements for feedback in activity minutes per day) to improve the fit between the user, technology, and the organization of care, which is important for the usability and acceptability of the tool. The tool embedded in primary care will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.

[1]  Mical K. Shilts,et al.  Goal Setting as a Strategy for Dietary and Physical Activity Behavior Change: A Review of the Literature , 2004, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[2]  G. Clifford,et al.  Wireless technology in disease management and medicine. , 2012, Annual review of medicine.

[3]  Nara L. Newcomer,et al.  User Centered Design , 2014, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[4]  F. Timmins Nursing Research Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice , 2013 .

[5]  Robert A. Virzi,et al.  Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough? , 1992 .

[6]  Y. Miller,et al.  The effectiveness of physical activity interventions for the treatment of overweight and obesity and type 2 diabetes. , 2004, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[7]  Cindy Veenhof,et al.  The effects of Hartcoach, a life style intervention provided by telephone on the reduction of coronary risk factors: a randomised trial , 2012, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

[8]  P. Gollwitzer Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[9]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. , 2002, JAMA.

[10]  W H Rogers,et al.  Long-term functioning and well-being outcomes associated with physical activity and exercise in patients with chronic conditions in the Medical Outcomes Study. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  M. Kenward,et al.  Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[12]  Somnath Chatterji,et al.  Worldwide variability in physical inactivity a 51-country survey. , 2008, American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

[13]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  Object-oriented software engineering - a use case driven approach , 1993, TOOLS.

[14]  Kenneth Meijer,et al.  Objective physical activity assessment in patients with chronic organ failure: a validation study of a new single-unit activity monitor. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Theory-driven design strategies for technologies that support behavior change in everyday life , 2009, CHI.

[16]  A. Stewart,et al.  Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. , 1999, Medical care.

[17]  Rick Krohn There's an app for that--mHealth takes center stage. , 2010, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[18]  Ian Robinson,et al.  Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: A theoretical framework for involving users in the development process , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[19]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[20]  H. Holman,et al.  Chronic disease--the need for a new clinical education. , 2004, JAMA.

[21]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems , 1993, INTERCHI.

[22]  B. Dicianno,et al.  Targeted Preventive Care May Be Needed for Adults with Congenital Spine Anomalies , 2011, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[23]  R Lindberg,et al.  Active living: on the road with the 10,000 Steps program. , 2000, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[24]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden , 2008, CHI.

[25]  Waegemann Cp,et al.  mHealth: the next generation of telemedicine? , 2010, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[26]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: Planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise , 2005 .

[27]  Lijing Ouyang,et al.  Health care expenditures of children and adults with spina bifida in a privately insured U.S. population. , 2007, Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology.

[28]  Thomas A Louis,et al.  Comparative effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in clinical practice. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Breakaway: an ambient display designed to change human behavior , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[30]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities , 2009, Assets '09.

[31]  Marlien Varnfield,et al.  Uptake of a technology‐assisted home‐care cardiac rehabilitation program , 2011, The Medical journal of Australia.

[32]  Takashi Muto,et al.  Evaluation of a computer-tailored lifestyle modification support tool for employees in Japan. , 2009, Industrial health.

[33]  J. Bourbeau,et al.  Making pulmonary rehabilitation a success in COPD. , 2010, Swiss medical weekly.

[34]  B. Fjeldsoe,et al.  Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[35]  Alexander K. Koch,et al.  Self-Regulation Through Goal Setting , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[36]  Brad E Dicianno,et al.  Hospitalizations of adults with spina bifida and congenital spinal cord anomalies. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[37]  M. C. Takenga,et al.  Development of a mobile teledermatology system. , 2012, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[38]  G. Clayden,et al.  ANORECTAL FUNCTION OF CHILDREN WITH NEUROLOGICAL PROBLEMS. : SPINA BIFIDA , 1993, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[39]  E. Balas,et al.  Healthcare via cell phones: a systematic review. , 2009, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[40]  Gunnar Hartvigsen,et al.  A System for Monitoring Physical Activity Data Among People with Type 2 Diabetes , 2008, MIE.

[41]  G. Hartvigsen,et al.  Features of Mobile Diabetes Applications: Review of the Literature and Analysis of Current Applications Compared Against Evidence-Based Guidelines , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[42]  James A. Landay,et al.  Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity , 2006, CHI.

[43]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach , 2009 .

[44]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  The International Prevalence Study on Physical Activity: results from 20 countries , 2009, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[45]  Carole Brown Mcsp Chronic Disease and Disability A contemporary rehabilitation approach to medical practice , 1996 .

[46]  Yeh-Liang Hsu,et al.  A Review of Accelerometry-Based Wearable Motion Detectors for Physical Activity Monitoring , 2010, Sensors.

[47]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Finding common ground: patient-centeredness and evidence-based chronic illness care. , 2005, Journal of alternative and complementary medicine.

[48]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  BMC Public Health BioMed Central Study protocol , 2008 .

[49]  Brianna S Fjeldsoe,et al.  MobileMums: A Randomized Controlled Trial of an SMS-Based Physical Activity Intervention , 2010, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[50]  Tanisha Jowsey,et al.  One size does not fit all: the different experiences of those with chronic heart failure, type 2 diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2013, Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association.

[51]  L. Rolnitzky,et al.  High cost of stage IV pressure ulcers. , 2010, American journal of surgery.

[52]  M. Megna,et al.  Educational and motivational support service: a pilot study for mobile‐phone‐based interventions in patients with psoriasis , 2013, The British journal of dermatology.

[53]  J. Annesi,et al.  Effects of Computer Feedback on Adherence to Exercise , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[54]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  A behavior model for persuasive design , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[55]  Nicol Nijland,et al.  A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[56]  G Plasqui,et al.  Daily physical activity assessment with accelerometers: new insights and validation studies , 2013, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[57]  Mary H Kalfoss,et al.  A comparative study of quality of life among adults with spina bifida , 2006, Cerebrospinal Fluid Research.

[58]  J. Brug,et al.  The Effectiveness of Tailored Feedback and Action Plans in an Intervention Addressing Multiple Health Behaviors , 2008, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[59]  Thierry Troosters,et al.  Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[60]  M. D. Adrian Sandler,et al.  Living with Spina Bifida: A Guide for Families and Professionals , 1997 .

[61]  James R. Lewis,et al.  Sample sizes for usability tests: mostly math, not magic , 2006, INTR.

[62]  M. Decramer,et al.  A clinical practice guideline for physiotherapists treating patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on a systematic review of available evidence , 2009, Clinical rehabilitation.

[63]  S. Marshall,et al.  The transtheoretical model of behavior change: a meta-analysis of applications to physical activity and exercise , 2001, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[64]  R. Oostendorp,et al.  How to promote healthy behaviours in patients? An overview of evidence for behaviour change techniques , 2010, Health promotion international.

[65]  A. Marshall,et al.  Use of a Smartphone for Improved Self-Management of Pulmonary Rehabilitation , 2008, International journal of telemedicine and applications.

[66]  I. Olkin,et al.  Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. , 2007, JAMA.

[67]  W. Jack,et al.  Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): a randomised trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[68]  Cristina Masella,et al.  CONSORT-EHEALTH Checklist V1.6.2 Report , 2013 .

[69]  David W. McDonald,et al.  Using Mobile & Personal Sensing Technologies to Support Health Behavior Change in Everyday Life: Lessons Learned , 2009, AMIA.

[70]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game , 2006, UbiComp.

[71]  Rickey E Carter,et al.  A prospective study of health and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[72]  A. Haines,et al.  The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: a systematic review protocol , 2010, BMC Research Notes.

[73]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  The Evaluator Effect: A Chilling Fact About Usability Evaluation Methods , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[74]  An Jacobs,et al.  A methodology for shifting the focus of e-health support design onto user needs: A case in the homecare field , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.