Dynamic Client Portfolios as Sources of Ambidexterity: Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Client Relationships

This paper explains how dynamic client portfolios can be a source of ambidexterity (i.e., exploration and exploitation) for knowledge-intensive firms (KIFs). Drawing from a unique qualitative dataset of firms in the global reinsurance market, we show how different types of client relationships underpin a dynamic client portfolio and become a source of ambidexterity for a KIF. We develop a process model to show how KIFs attain knowledge by segmenting their client portfolios, use that knowledge to explore and exploit within and across their client relationships, and dynamically adjust their client portfolios over time. Our study contributes to the literature on external sources of ambidexterity and dynamic management of client knowledge within KIFs.

[1]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[2]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[3]  A. Werr,et al.  Exploring Management Consulting Firms as Knowledge Systems , 2003 .

[4]  M. Alvesson.  Management Of Knowledge-Intensive Companies , 1995 .

[5]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[6]  D. Weir.  Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography , 2013 .

[7]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Competing for Attention in Knowledge Markets: Electronic Document Dissemination in a Management Consulting Company , 2001 .

[8]  H. Gardner,et al.  Knowledge-Based Innovation: Emergence and Embedding of New Practice Areas in Management Consulting Firms , 2007 .

[9]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[10]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Collaborative Strategies in Design-intensive Industries: Knowledge Diversity and Innovation , 2010 .

[11]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2006 .

[12]  Mikael Holmqvist,et al.  Experiential Learning Processes of Exploitation and Exploration Within and Between Organisations : An Empirical Study of Product Development, Department of Business Studies , 2003 .

[13]  Ross Dawson,et al.  Developing Knowledge-Based Client Relationships , 2012 .

[14]  Natalia Nikolova,et al.  Client-consultant interaction: Capturing social practices of professional service production , 2009 .

[15]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Client Co-Production in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services , 2002 .

[16]  R. Suddaby.  From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[17]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[18]  G. Winch,et al.  MANAGING THE KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION: THE CASE OF ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE , 1993 .

[19]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Managing knowledge in global service firms: Centers of excellence , 1998 .

[20]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[22]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Conducting global team-based ethnography: Methodological challenges and practical methods , 2015 .

[23]  Tommy Jensen.  Knowledge Work and Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 2006 .

[24]  Timothy N. Carroll,et al.  The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms , 1999 .

[25]  Timothy Morris.  Asserting Property Rights: Knowledge Codification in the Professional Service Firm , 2001 .

[26]  Arun Rai,et al.  Knowledge Sharing Ambidexterity in Long-Term Interorganizational Relationships , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[27]  P. Gemmel.  Strategic Management of Professional Service Firms, 3rd edition , 2006 .

[28]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[29]  Zeki Simsek.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Towards a Multilevel Understanding , 2009 .

[30]  Andrew von Nordenflycht.  What Is a Professional Service Firm? Toward a Theory and Taxonomy of Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 2010 .

[31]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Complex Business Models: Managing Strategic Paradoxes Simultaneously , 2010 .

[32]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[33]  Steven E. Salterio,et al.  Auditor–client management relationships and roles in negotiating financial reporting , 2008 .

[34]  Jaideep Anand,et al.  Non‐additivity in portfolios of exploration activities: a real options‐based analysis of equity alliances in biotechnology , 2004 .

[35]  N. Nikolova,et al.  Knowledge production in consulting teams , 2010 .

[36]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[37]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Structural Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[39]  Tim Morris,et al.  Organisation and expertise: An exploration of knowledge bases and the management of accounting , 1998 .

[40]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[41]  Michel Ferrary,et al.  Specialized organizations and ambidextrous clusters in the open innovation paradigm , 2011 .

[42]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[43]  Christopher D. Mckenna.  The World's Newest Profession: Contents , 2006 .

[44]  A. Lewin,et al.  The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[45]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[46]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  DIFFERENT KNOWLEDGE, DIFFERENT BENEFITS: TOWARD APRODUCTIVITY PERSPECTIVE ON KNOWLEDGE SHARING INORGANIZATIONS. , 2001 .

[47]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[48]  Varun Grover,et al.  General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  J. Benders,et al.  Contested commodification: Consultancies and their struggle with new concept development , 2005 .

[50]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization , 2001 .

[51]  J. Benders,et al.  On sedimentation in management fashion: an institutional perspective , 2012 .

[52]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[53]  M. Sarvary.  Knowledge Management and Competition in the Consulting Industry , 1999 .

[54]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[55]  Namrata Malhotra,et al.  Heterogeneity in Professional Service Firms , 2009 .

[56]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[57]  W. Starbuck.  Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[58]  A. Tiwana.  Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity , 2008 .

[59]  Silvia Cantarello,et al.  The intellectual structure of organizational ambidexterity: A bibliographic investigation into the state of the art , 2012 .

[60]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Making the Most of Your Company's Knowledge: A Strategic Framework , 2001 .

[61]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change , 1996 .

[62]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Managing Innovation Paradoxes: Ambidexterity Lessons from Leading Product Design Companies , 2010 .

[63]  D. Maister.  Managing the Professional Service Firm , 1997 .

[64]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2018, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[65]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Making a Market for Acts of God: The Practice of Risk Trading in the Global Reinsurance Industry , 2015 .

[66]  M. Pratt.  From the Editors: For the Lack of a Boilerplate: Tips on Writing Up (and Reviewing) Qualitative Research , 2009 .

[67]  Bente R. Løwendahl,et al.  Knowledge Development through Client Interaction: A Comparative Study , 2003 .

[68]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[69]  Irem Demirkan,et al.  The Performance Consequences of Ambidexterity in Strategic Alliance Formations: Empirical Investigation and Computational Theorizing , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[70]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[71]  Bente R. Løwendahl,et al.  Strategic Management of Professional Service Firms , 1997 .

[72]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003 .

[73]  Miklos Sarvary,et al.  Leveraging the Customer Base: Creating Competitive Advantage Through Knowledge Management , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[74]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[75]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[76]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[77]  Bente R. Løwendahl,et al.  Knowledge and Value Creation in Professional Service Firms: A Framework for Analysis , 2001 .

[78]  Olli-Pekka Kauppila,et al.  Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships , 2010 .

[79]  Frank W. Dewhurst,et al.  Linking organizational learning and customer capital through an ambidexterity context: an empirical investigation in SMEs1 , 2007 .

[80]  G. Padula.  Enhancing the Innovation Performance of Firms by Balancing Cohesiveness and Bridging Ties , 2008 .

[81]  P. Berthon,et al.  Market Orientation, Generative Learning, Innovation Strategy and Business Performance Inter-Relationships in Bioscience Firms , 2008 .

[82]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management , 2007 .

[83]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[84]  Ragnhild Kvålshaugen,et al.  Choosing to Learn and Learning to Choose: Strategies for Client Co-Production and Knowledge Development , 2007 .

[85]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit , 2011 .