Satellite gradiometry using a satellite pair

Abstract.The GRACE mission has substantiated the low–low satellite-to-satellite tracking (LL-SST) concept. The LL-SST configuration can be combined with the previously realized high–low SST concept in the CHAMP mission to provide a much higher accuracy. The line of sight (LOS) acceleration difference between the GRACE satellite pair, the simplest form of the combined observable, is mostly used for mapping the global gravity field of the Earth in terms of spherical harmonic coefficients. As an alternative observable, a linear combination of the gravitational gradient tensor components is proposed. Being a one-point function and having a direct relation with the field geometry (curvature of the field at the point) are two noteworthy achievements of the alternative formulation. In addition, using an observation quantity that is related to the second-instead of the first-order derivatives of the gravitational potential amplifies the high-frequency part of the signal. Since the transition from the first- to the second-order derivatives includes the application of a finite-differences scheme, the high-frequency part of the noise is also amplified. Nevertheless, due to the different spectral behaviour of signal and noise, in the end the second-order approach leads to improved gravitational field resolution. Mathematical formulae for the gradiometry approach, for both linear and higher-degree approximations, are derived. The proposed approach is implemented for recovery of the global gravitational field and the results are compared with those of LOS acceleration differences. Moreover, LOS acceleration difference residuals are calculated, which are at the level of a few tenths of mGal. Error analysis shows that the residuals of the estimated degree variances are less than 10−3. Furthermore, the gravity anomaly residuals are less than 2 mGal for most points on the Earth.

[1]  P. Viviers 1880 , 1881, Camden Fifth Series.

[2]  M. Wolff,et al.  Direct measurements of the Earth's gravitational potential using a satellite pair , 1969 .

[3]  Geoid Heights, Geoid Height Differences, and Mean Gravity Anomalies from 'Low-Low' Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking - An Error Analysis, , 1980 .

[4]  Alexander Graham,et al.  Kronecker Products and Matrix Calculus: With Applications , 1981 .

[5]  Edward J. Krakiwsky,et al.  Geodesy, the concepts , 1982 .

[6]  L. Sjöberg,et al.  Reformulation of Stokes's theory for higher than second‐degree reference field and modification of integration kernels , 1991 .

[7]  G. Seeber Satellite Geodesy: Foundations, Methods, and Applications , 1993 .

[8]  F. Sansò,et al.  Spherical harmonic analysis of satellite gradiometry , 1993 .

[9]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96 , 1998 .

[10]  C. Jekeli The determination of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking , 1999 .

[11]  Spherical harmonic computations with topographic/isostatic coefficients , 1999 .

[12]  Ramon V. Garcia Local Geoid Determination from GRACE Mission , 2001 .

[13]  Will Featherstone,et al.  A unified approach to the Clenshaw summation and the recursive computation of very high degree and order normalised associated Legendre functions , 2002 .

[14]  G. Balmino,et al.  Dedicated gravity field missions—principles and aims , 2002 .

[15]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  Energy integral method for gravity field determination from satellite orbit coordinates , 2003 .

[16]  Christopher Jekeli,et al.  Static and temporal gravity field recovery using grace potential difference observables , 2003 .

[17]  How to Climb the Gravity Wall , 2003 .