The brain in your pocket: Evidence that Smartphones are used to supplant thinking

Novel framing of Smartphone use as instantiation of extended mind.Lower analytic thinking associates with increased Smartphone use.Results suggest that people offload thinking to the device.Supports conceptualization of Smartphone use as a type of cognitive miserliness. With the advent of Smartphone technology, access to the internet and its associated knowledge base is at one's fingertips. What consequences does this have for human cognition? We frame Smartphone use as an instantiation of the extended mind-the notion that our cognition goes beyond our brains-and in so doing, characterize a modern form of cognitive miserliness. Specifically, that people typically forego effortful analytic thinking in lieu of fast and easy intuition suggests that individuals may allow their Smartphones to do their thinking for them. Our account predicts that individuals who are relatively less willing and/or able to engage effortful reasoning processes may compensate by relying on the internet through their Smartphones. Across three studies, we find that those who think more intuitively and less analytically when given reasoning problems were more likely to rely on their Smartphones (i.e., extended mind) for information in their everyday lives. There was no such association with the amount of time using the Smartphone for social media and entertainment purposes, nor did boredom proneness qualify any of our results. These findings demonstrate that people may offload thinking to technology, which in turn demands that psychological science understand the meshing of mind and media to adequately characterize human experience and cognition in the modern era.

[1]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[2]  S. Mann,et al.  Boredom in the lecture theatre: An investigation into the contributors, moderators and outcomes of boredom amongst university students , 2009 .

[3]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[4]  Guillermo Campitelli,et al.  Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[5]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. , 1997 .

[6]  Wade C. Jacobsen,et al.  The Wired Generation: Academic and Social Outcomes of Electronic Media Use Among University Students , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[8]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[9]  A. Clark,et al.  The Extended Mind , 1998, Analysis.

[10]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological , 2022 .

[11]  Shelia R. Cotten,et al.  Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Robert M. Hauser,et al.  Trends in Black-White Test Score Differentials: II. The WORDSUM Vocabulary Test , 1998 .

[13]  G. Miller,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological the Smartphone Psychology Manifesto on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science the Smartphone Psychology Manifesto Previous Research Using Mobile Electronic Devices What Smartphones Can Do Now and Will Be Able to Do in the near Future , 2022 .

[14]  Jonathan Evans How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many? , 2009 .

[15]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values , 2014 .

[16]  Rakefet Ackerman,et al.  The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking , 2013, Cognition.

[17]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Belief inhibition during thinking: Not always winning but at least taking part , 2009, Cognition.

[18]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking , 2008, Cognition.

[19]  Wilburn Lane,et al.  The Impact of Personality Traits on Smartphone Ownership and Use , 2011 .

[20]  Jonathan S. Evans,et al.  Bias in human reasoning , 1990 .

[21]  N. Carr The Shallows: How the Internet Is Changing the Way We Think, Read and Remember , 2010 .

[22]  M. Mcluhan Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man , 1964 .

[23]  Shao-I Chiu,et al.  A model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, mobile phone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese university female students , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  David Miller,et al.  Web search strategies and human individual differences: Cognitive and demographic factors, Internet attitudes, and approaches , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[26]  K. Stanovich What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought , 2009 .

[27]  Valerie A. Thompson,et al.  Intuition, reason, and metacognition , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[29]  Andrew Lepp,et al.  The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and Satisfaction with Life in college students , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening Mammography , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[31]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief , 2012, Cognition.

[32]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[33]  B. Sparrow,et al.  Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips , 2011, Science.

[34]  Jian Li,et al.  Exploring the relationships between college students' cell phone use, personality and leisure , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Web search strategies and human individual differences: Cognitive and demographic factors, Internet attitudes, and approaches: Research Articles , 2005 .

[36]  C. Ko,et al.  Symptoms of problematic cellular phone use, functional impairment and its association with depression among adolescents in Southern Taiwan. , 2009, Journal of adolescence.

[37]  J. Baron Judgment Misguided: Intuition and Error in Public Decision Making , 1998 .

[38]  Steven J. Dick,et al.  Cultural evolution, the postbiological universe and SETI , 2003, International Journal of Astrobiology.

[39]  Angel Otero,et al.  Factors Associated with Cell Phone Use in Adolescents in the Community of Madrid (Spain) , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[40]  Shelia R. Cotten,et al.  No A 4 U: The relationship between multitasking and academic performance , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[41]  R. Farmer,et al.  Boredom proneness--the development and correlates of a new scale. , 1986, Journal of personality assessment.

[42]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin , 2004 .

[43]  後藤 和彦 Marshall McLuhan:Understanding Media-The extensions of man, New York:McGraw-Hill, 1964 , 1967 .

[44]  S. Lilienfeld,et al.  Giving Debiasing Away: Can Psychological Research on Correcting Cognitive Errors Promote Human Welfare? , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[45]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[46]  J. Lygeros,et al.  Decision Making I , 2014 .

[47]  Mirko Farina Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension. , 2010 .

[48]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Reasoned connections: A dual-process perspective on creative thought , 2015 .

[49]  A. Clark Supersizing the Mind , 2008 .

[50]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in rational thought. , 1998 .

[51]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Rationality and reasoning , 1996 .

[52]  Laura A. Nichols,et al.  Development of a psychometrically sound internet addiction scale: a preliminary step. , 2004, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.