A new therapy (MP29-02) is effective for the long-term treatment of chronic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE MP29-02 (Dymista), a novel intranasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) and fluticasone propionate (FP), is significantly better than first-line therapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), and is well tolerated following 52 weeks of continuous use in chronic rhinitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of MP29-02 versus FP in patients with chronic rhinitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS In total, 612 chronic rhinitis patients (perennial allergic rhinitis [PAR], n = 424; nonallergic rhinitis, n=188) aged 12 years or older were enrolled into this open-label, parallel-group study and randomized to MP29-02 (1 spray/nostril bid) or FP nasal spray (2 sprays/nostril qd) for 52 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by change from baseline in PM reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS), time to first achieve 100% PM rTNSS reduction from baseline, and percentage of symptom-free days in the total and PAR populations posthoc. RESULTS MP29-02 reduced patients' PM rTNSS from baseline significantly more than FP, from Day 1 up to and including week 28 (-2.88 vs -2.53; P = .0048), with treatment difference maintained for 52 weeks. Fluctuation in significance after week 28 might be explained, at least in part, by decreasing sample size, permitted according to ICH guidelines. By Day 1 almost twice as many MP29-02-patients were symptom free. After 1 month, 71.1% of MP29-02 patients experienced 100% rTNSS reduction (60.3% for FP), and did on a median of 9 days faster (P=.0024). Over 52 weeks MP29-02 patients experienced 8.4% more symptom-free days (P = .0005). These results were mirrored in the PAR subpopulation. CONCLUSION These results confirm MP29-02's wide therapeutic spectrum and assert its consistent superiority over an intranasal corticosteroid.

[1]  E. Meltzer,et al.  MP29-02 (a novel intranasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate) in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of efficacy and safety. , 2012, Allergy and asthma proceedings.

[2]  J. Bousquet,et al.  A novel intranasal therapy of azelastine with fluticasone for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. , 2012, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[3]  S. Fujieda,et al.  Efficacy of mometasone furoate nasal spray for nasal symptoms, quality of life, rhinitis-disturbed sleep, and nasal nitric oxide in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. , 2012, Allergy and asthma proceedings.

[4]  E. Meltzer,et al.  Allergic rhinitis substantially impacts patient quality of life: findings from the Nasal Allergy Survey Assessing Limitations. , 2012, The Journal of family practice.

[5]  C. Bachert,et al.  Treatment preferences in patients with moderate-severe seasonal allergic rhinitis: findings of a discrete choice experiment , 2012 .

[6]  J. Bousquet,et al.  Episode pattern and healthcare utilisation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis , 2012 .

[7]  P. Clement,et al.  Symptom Suppression in Subjects with Perennial Allergic Rhinitis Treated with Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray , 2011, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[8]  M. Kaliner Nonallergic rhinopathy (formerly known as vasomotor rhinitis). , 2011, Immunology and allergy clinics of North America.

[9]  H. Schünemann,et al.  How representative are clinical study patients with allergic rhinitis in primary care? , 2011, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[10]  N. Snowise,et al.  Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray is Effective and Well Tolerated for Perennial Allergic Rhinitis in Adolescents and Adults , 2010, American journal of rhinology & allergy.

[11]  F. Hampel,et al.  Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of azelastine and fluticasone in a single nasal spray delivery device. , 2010, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[12]  A. Cervin,et al.  Allergic rhinitis and the common cold – high cost to society , 2009, Allergy.

[13]  E. Meltzer,et al.  Mometasone furoate nasal spray is safe and effective for 1-year treatment of children with perennial allergic rhinitis. , 2009, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[14]  B. Lambrecht,et al.  Important research questions in allergy and related diseases: nonallergic rhinitis: a GA2LEN paper , 2008, Allergy.

[15]  William H. Yang,et al.  Effect of once-daily fluticasone furoate nasal spray on nasal symptoms in adults and adolescents with perennial allergic rhinitis. , 2008, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[16]  E. Meltzer,et al.  Fluticasone furoate nasal spray: effective monotherapy for symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis in adults/adolescents. , 2008, Allergy and asthma proceedings.

[17]  G. Viegi,et al.  Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008 * , 2008, Allergy.

[18]  J. Maspero,et al.  Safety and efficacy of fluticasone furoate in pediatric patients with perennial allergic rhinitis , 2008, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[19]  M. Schatz A survey of the burden of allergic rhinitis in the USA , 2007, Allergy.

[20]  J. Bousquet,et al.  A survey of the burden of allergic rhinitis in Europe , 2007 .

[21]  W. Fokkens,et al.  Long‐term safety of fluticasone furoate nasal spray in adults and adolescents with perennial allergic rhinitis , 2007, Allergy.

[22]  T. Zuberbier,et al.  Undertreatment of rhinitis symptoms in Europe: findings from a cross‐sectional questionnaire survey , 2007, Allergy.

[23]  R Mösges,et al.  Today’s allergic rhinitis patients are different: new factors that may play a role , 2007, Allergy.

[24]  E. Meltzer Allergic rhinitis: the impact of discordant perspectives of patient and physician on treatment decisions. , 2007, Clinical therapeutics.

[25]  B. Lanier,et al.  Keys to successful management of patients with allergic rhinitis: Focus on patient confidence, compliance, and satisfaction , 2007, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[26]  C. Bachert,et al.  Prevalence, classification and perception of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in Belgium , 2006, Allergy.

[27]  Bashar Allaf,et al.  Severity and impairment of allergic rhinitis in patients consulting in primary care. , 2006, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[28]  P. Gergen,et al.  Prevalences of positive skin test responses to 10 common allergens in the US population: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. , 2005, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[29]  R. Green,et al.  THE BURDEN OF ALLERGIC RHINITIS , 2005 .

[30]  G. Leydon,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative methods in UK health research: then, now and...? , 2002, European journal of cancer care.

[31]  P. Lieberman,et al.  Update on nonallergic rhinitis. , 2001, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[32]  J. Bousquet,et al.  Local safety of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide: clinical and histological aspects of nasal mucosa in the long-term treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. , 2001, Rhinology.

[33]  S. Durham,et al.  Assessment by Nasal Biopsy of Long-Term Use of Mometasone Furoate Aqueous Nasal Spray (Nasonex) in the Treatment of Perennial Rhinitis , 1998, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.