Forces of various nickel titanium closed coil springs.

OBJECTIVE To compare the forces generated by 14 different 9 mm springs supplied by five different companies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five replicates of 14 different 9 mm springs were evaluated, resulting in 70 total specimens. Each was extended once from its resting length to 12 mm and then was deactivated. All tests were performed in a 37 degrees C water bath. Forces were recorded at the 12 mm extension and deactivation distances of 9 mm, 6 mm, 3 mm, and 1 mm using an MTS force gauge. Data were collected with Testworks software, version 4.0, and were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with one factor alternated. RESULTS Mean peak load forces at 12 mm were significantly different between springs, and these forces varied from 147 to 474 grams. Mean unload forces measured at 9 mm, 6 mm, and 3 mm of deactivation values were highly variable, and only 6 of the 14 springs exhibited a "physiologic" mean unload force of 50 grams or less over the total deactivation range. CONCLUSIONS Few springs tested exhibited physiologic peak load forces and constant deactivation forces. This study suggests that labeling of nickel titanium closed coil springs is confusing and misleading.

[1]  J. V. von Fraunhofer,et al.  Force generation by orthodontic coil springs. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[2]  H. Worthington,et al.  A Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Three Methods of Orthodontic Space Closure , 2002, Journal of orthodontics.

[3]  T. Cangialosi,et al.  Pseudoelasticity and thermoelasticity of nickel-titanium alloys: a clinically oriented review. Part II: Deactivation forces. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  T. Cangialosi,et al.  Pseudoelasticity and thermoelasticity of nickel-titanium alloys: a clinically oriented review. Part I: Temperature transitional ranges. , 2001, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  C J Burstone,et al.  Force characteristics of nickel-titanium tension coil springs. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  C Bourauel,et al.  Laboratory analysis of superelastic NiTi compression springs. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  L. Mair,et al.  A clinical study of space closure with nickel-titanium closed coil springs and an elastic module. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  D Drescher,et al.  Superelastic nickel titanium alloy retraction springs--an experimental investigation of force systems. , 1997, European journal of orthodontics.

[9]  L H Mair,et al.  A comparison of the rate of space closure using a nickel-titanium spring and an elastic module: a clinical study. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  R. Nanda,et al.  Force degradation of closed coil springs: an in vitro evaluation. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[11]  W. Rock,et al.  Force Reduction of Orthodontic Elastomeric Chains after One Month in the Mouth , 1986, British journal of orthodontics.

[12]  C. Manhartsberger,et al.  Force delivery of Ni-Ti coil springs. , 1996, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  R. McLaughlin,et al.  Controlled space closure with a preadjusted appliance system. , 1990, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.