Fine-Tuning Group Collaboration Environments: How Differences in General Causality Orientation and Performance Targets Shape Interaction and Performance

Technology-supported work teams are increasingly used by organizations to support various business processes. Previous literature has examined the influence of various factors on team performance, yet, differences in participants' individual motivational orientation have received little attention. In this study, we aim to understand the effects of differences in motivational orientation on performance, this will allow for the design of information systems to account for such individual differences, increasing performance within the context of computer-mediated collaboration. Using computer-mediated idea generation as an instantiation of collaboration systems, we test the interacting effects of performance targets and differences in motivational orientation in a controlled laboratory experiment. Overall, our results provide support for the importance of considering individual differences in the design of human-computer interfaces of collaboration environments, and we conclude our study with a discussion of implications for the design of human-computer interfaces for computer-mediated collaboration.

[1]  Venkatesh,et al.  Computer Technology Training in the Workplace: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Effect of Mood. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[2]  S. Harter Effectance Motivation Reconsidered. Toward a Developmental Model , 1978 .

[3]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  The Future of Work Motivation Theory , 2004 .

[4]  Peter A. Heslin,et al.  Better than Brainstorming? Potential Contextual Boundary Conditions to Brainwriting for Idea Generation in Organizations , 2009 .

[5]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: quality through coordination , 2008, CSCW.

[6]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  On the Measurement of Ideation Quality , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement , 2010 .

[10]  S. M. Arnsten Intrinsic motivation. , 1990, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[11]  David Gefen,et al.  The Art of Successful Information Systems Outsourcing , 2010 .

[12]  Steven E. Ekeberg,et al.  THE ROLE OF INTENTIONS IN WORK MOTIVATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR GOAL-SETTING THEORY AND RESEARCH , 1991 .

[13]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The effects of individual cognitive ability and idea stimulation on idea-generation performance , 2006 .

[14]  Ellen A. Skinner,et al.  Perceived Control, Motivation, & Coping , 1995 .

[15]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[16]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Financial incentives and the "performance of crowds" , 2009, HCOMP '09.

[17]  G. Huber Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much ADO About Nothing? , 1983 .

[18]  R. Koestner,et al.  Causality orientations, failure, and achievement. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[19]  J. Zittrain,et al.  Ubiquitous human computing , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[21]  E. Deci,et al.  Nature and autonomy: An organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development , 1997, Development and Psychopathology.

[22]  H. Harlow The Nature of Love , 1958 .

[23]  R. White,et al.  Ego and reality in psychoanalytic theory : a proposal regarding independent ego energies , 1963 .

[24]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[25]  E. A. Locke,et al.  A theory of goal setting & task performance , 1990 .

[26]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  Intrinsic and Prosocial Motivations, Perspective Taking, and Creativity , 2011, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[27]  R. W. White Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. , 1959, Psychological review.

[28]  A. Pinsonneault,et al.  Small Group Brainstorming and Idea Quality , 2001 .

[29]  B. Hennessey The Social Psychology of Creativity , 2003, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[30]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Financial incentives and the "performance of crowds" , 2009, SIGKDD Explor..

[31]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[32]  Harry T Rez's Domains of experience: Investigating relationship processes from three perspectives. , 2013 .

[33]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Enhancing the Motivational Affordance of Information Systems: The Effects of Real-Time Performance Feedback and Goal Setting in Group Collaboration Environments , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[36]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[37]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[38]  W. Heath The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies , 2008 .

[39]  E. Deci,et al.  The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality , 1985 .

[40]  J. Daniel Sherman,et al.  The Influence of Organizational Structure on Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Motivation , 1984 .

[41]  R. L. Ebel,et al.  Estimation of the reliability of ratings , 1951 .

[42]  David J Solomon,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access the Rating Reliability Calculator , 2022 .