The influence of sensory information on two-component coordination during quiet stance.

When standing quietly, human upright stance is typically approximated as a single segment inverted pendulum. In contrast, investigations, which perturb upright stance with support, surface translations or visual driving stimuli have shown that the body behaves like a two-segment pendulum, displaying both in-phase and anti-phase patterns between the upper and lower body. We have recently shown that these patterns co-exist during quiet stance; in-phase and anti-phase for frequencies below and above 1 Hz, respectively. Here we investigated whether the characteristics of these basic patterns were influenced by the addition or removal of sensory information. Ten healthy young subjects stood upright on a rigid platform with different combinations of sensory information: eyes were open or closed with or without light touch contact (<1N) of the right index fingertip with a 5 cm diameter rigid force plate. The in-phase and anti-phase pattern co-exist in both the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) directions of sway. The real part of trunk-leg complex coherence decreased with the addition of vision and light touch, corresponding to a transition from the in-phase to anti-phase pattern at a lower frequency. In the AP direction, the decrease was only observed at frequencies below 1 Hz where the in-phase pattern predominates. Additional sensory information had no observable effect at sway frequencies above 1 Hz, where the anti-phase pattern predominates. Both patterns are clearly the result of a double-linked inverted pendulum dynamics, but the coherence of the in-phase pattern is more susceptible to modulation by sensory information than the anti-phase pattern.

[1]  Tim Kiemel,et al.  Multisensory fusion and the stochastic structure of postural sway , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  An adaptive model of sensory integration in a dynamic environment applied to human stance control , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  Herman van der Kooij,et al.  A multisensory integration model of human stance control , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  Alexander A. Frolov,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of movement strategies in human forward trunk bending. I. Modeling , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  T. Stoffregen Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  R. Peterka Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  D. Winter,et al.  Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Tim Kiemel,et al.  Multisensory information for human postural control: integrating touch and vision , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  I P Pappas,et al.  Stability criterion for controlling standing in able-bodied subjects. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J R Lackner,et al.  The structure of somatosensory information for human postural control. , 1998, Motor control.

[11]  L. Menegaldo,et al.  Biomechanical modeling and optimal control of human posture. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  F E Zajac,et al.  Human standing posture: multi-joint movement strategies based on biomechanical constraints. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[13]  F. Plum Handbook of Physiology. , 1960 .

[14]  A. Kuo An optimal state estimation model of sensory integration in human postural balance , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[15]  A.D. Kuo,et al.  An optimal control model for analyzing human postural balance , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  G. McCollum,et al.  Form and exploration of mechanical stability limits in erect stance. , 1989, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  F. Horak,et al.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[19]  Tim Kiemel,et al.  Comparing internal models of the dynamics of the visual environment , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Influence of body segment parameters and modeling assumptions on the estimate of center of mass trajectory. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Tim Kiemel,et al.  A unified view of quiet and perturbed stance: simultaneous co-existing excitable modes , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  Tim Kiemel,et al.  Controlling human upright posture: velocity information is more accurate than position or acceleration. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Diltiazem blocks the PH-induced excitation of rat nociceptors together with their mechanical and electrical excitability in vitro. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.