Microconstriction arrays for high-throughput quantitative measurements of cell mechanical properties.

We describe a method for quantifying the mechanical properties of cells in suspension with a microfluidic device consisting of a parallel array of micron-sized constrictions. Using a high-speed charge-coupled device camera, we measure the flow speed, cell deformation, and entry time into the constrictions of several hundred cells per minute during their passage through the device. From the flow speed and the occupation state of the microconstriction array with cells, the driving pressure across each constriction is continuously computed. Cell entry times into microconstrictions decrease with increased driving pressure and decreased cell size according to a power law. From this power-law relationship, the cell elasticity and fluidity can be estimated. When cells are treated with drugs that depolymerize or stabilize the cytoskeleton or the nucleus, elasticity and fluidity data from all treatments collapse onto a master curve. Power-law rheology and collapse onto a master curve are predicted by the theory of soft glassy materials and have been previously shown to describe the mechanical behavior of cells adhering to a substrate. Our finding that this theory also applies to cells in suspension provides the foundation for a quantitative high-throughput measurement of cell mechanical properties with microfluidic devices.

[1]  B. Eckert.  Alteration of intermediate filament distribution in PtK1 cells by acrylamide. , 1985, European journal of cell biology.

[2]  Daniel T Chiu,et al.  A microfluidic model for single-cell capillary obstruction by Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Peter Grütter,et al.  Probing the viscoelastic behavior of cultured airway smooth muscle cells with atomic force microscopy: stiffening induced by contractile agonist. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[4]  Dino Di Carlo,et al.  Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Klavs F Jensen,et al.  Microfluidics-based assessment of cell deformability. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  Rashid Bashir,et al.  Biophysical properties of human breast cancer cells measured using silicon MEMS resonators and atomic force microscopy. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[7]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Rheology of Living Cells , 2011 .

[8]  Nathan Cermak,et al.  Characterizing deformability and surface friction of cancer cells , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Dennis E. Discher,et al.  Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  J J Fredberg,et al.  Selected contribution: time course and heterogeneity of contractile responses in cultured human airway smooth muscle cells. , 2001, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  C. Lim,et al.  Deformability study of breast cancer cells using microfluidics , 2009, Biomedical microdevices.

[12]  Yiider Tseng,et al.  Micromechanical mapping of live cells by multiple-particle-tracking microrheology. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[13]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  U. De Boni,et al.  Chromatin motion in neuronal interphase nuclei: changes induced by disruption of intermediate filaments. , 1991, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[15]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Cytoskeleton dynamics: fluctuations within the network. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[16]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Get round and stiff for mitosis , 2008, HFSP journal.

[17]  Daniel A Fletcher,et al.  Analyzing cell mechanics in hematologic diseases with microfluidic biophysical flow cytometry. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[18]  D E Ingber,et al.  Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. , 1993, Science.

[19]  Jeffrey J. Fredberg,et al.  Reinforcement versus Fluidization in Cytoskeletal Mechanoresponsiveness , 2009, PloS one.

[20]  Takaharu Okajima,et al.  Quantifying cell-to-cell variation in power-law rheology. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Integrin α5β1 facilitates cancer cell invasion through enhanced contractile forces , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  Daniel A Fletcher,et al.  Chemotherapy exposure increases leukemia cell stiffness. , 2007, Blood.

[23]  A. Colin,et al.  Competition between local collisions and collective hydrodynamic feedback controls traffic flows in microfluidic networks. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[24]  T C Lubensky,et al.  Microrheology, stress fluctuations, and active behavior of living cells. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[25]  Pierre Bongrand,et al.  Microfluidic investigation reveals distinct roles for actin cytoskeleton and myosin II activity in capillary leukocyte trafficking. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Andreas Janshoff,et al.  Atomic force microscopy-based microrheology reveals significant differences in the viscoelastic response between malign and benign cell lines , 2014, Open Biology.

[27]  S. Vanapalli,et al.  Probing the mechanical properties of brain cancer cells using a microfluidic cell squeezer device. , 2013, Biomicrofluidics.

[28]  Hongshen Ma,et al.  Microfluidic analysis of red blood cell deformability. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  A. Martinez-Arias,et al.  Chromatin decondensation and nuclear softening accompany Nanog downregulation in embryonic stem cells. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[30]  A. Ngan,et al.  THE BIOMECHANICS OF DRUG-TREATED LEUKEMIA CELLS INVESTIGATED USING OPTICAL TWEEZERS , 2012 .

[31]  P. Sager.  Cytoskeletal effects of acrylamide and 2,5-hexanedione: selective aggregation of vimentin filaments. , 1989, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[32]  D. Navajas,et al.  Scaling the microrheology of living cells. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[33]  U. Keyser,et al.  Real-time deformability cytometry: on-the-fly cell mechanical phenotyping , 2015, Nature Methods.

[34]  Jan Lammerding,et al.  Nuclear Envelope Composition Determines the Ability of Neutrophil-type Cells to Passage through Micron-scale Constrictions* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  Charles M Schroeder,et al.  A microfluidic-based hydrodynamic trap: design and implementation. , 2011, Lab on a chip.

[36]  G. Shivashankar,et al.  Dynamics of chromatin decondensation reveals the structural integrity of a mechanically prestressed nucleus. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[37]  Lap Man Lee,et al.  A microfluidic pipette array for mechanophenotyping of cancer cells and mechanical gating of mechanosensitive channels. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[38]  E. Sackmann,et al.  Measurement of local viscoelasticity and forces in living cells by magnetic tweezers. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[39]  Clemens F. Kaminski,et al.  Biophotonic techniques for the study of malaria-infected red blood cells , 2010, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[40]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Time scale and other invariants of integrative mechanical behavior in living cells. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  The regulatory role of cell mechanics for migration of differentiating myeloid cells , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Jennifer L. Rohn,et al.  Changes in Ect2 Localization Couple Actomyosin-Dependent Cell Shape Changes to Mitotic Progression , 2012, Developmental cell.

[43]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Quantifying the contribution of actin networks to the elastic strength of fibroblasts. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[44]  A. Rowat.  Physical properties of the nucleus studied by micropipette aspiration. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[45]  Stefan Schinkinger,et al.  Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[46]  D. Ingber,et al.  Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Rat airway smooth muscle cell during actin modulation: rheology and glassy dynamics. , 2005, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[48]  D A Weitz,et al.  Stress-dependent elasticity of composite actin networks as a model for cell behavior. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[49]  E. Wacholder,et al.  The flow fields in and around a droplet moving axially within a tube , 1970, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[50]  J. Simeon,et al.  Creep function of a single living cell. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[51]  Eckert Bs.  Alteration of intermediate filament distribution in PtK1 cells by acrylamide. , 1985 .

[52]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  Lamins A and C but Not Lamin B1 Regulate Nuclear Mechanics* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  Todd Sulchek,et al.  Stiffness Dependent Separation of Cells in a Microfluidic Device , 2012, PloS one.

[54]  Dennis E. Discher,et al.  Nuclear Lamin-A Scales with Tissue Stiffness and Enhances Matrix-Directed Differentiation , 2013, Science.

[55]  Chwee Teck Lim,et al.  Connections between single-cell biomechanics and human disease states: gastrointestinal cancer and malaria. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[56]  Jochen Guck,et al.  Viscoelastic Properties of Differentiating Blood Cells Are Fate- and Function-Dependent , 2012, PloS one.