Safety perception referents of permanent and temporary employees: safety climate boundaries in the industrial workplace.

OBJECTIVE To explore the significant referents of safety perceptions among permanent and temporary employees in order to identify the boundaries of safety climate in a heterogeneous workforce. METHOD Collection of data from semi-structured interviews with employees in manufacturing organizations, using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to identify basic safety perceptions. Independent raters used content analysis to examine the data. RESULTS Analysis of the data revealed differences between safety themes at organization, group and individual levels. Themes relating to the individual were more prevalent among temporary employees, while those relating to the group and the organization prevailed among permanent employees. CONCLUSIONS Permanent employees view organizational and group levels as significant referents of safety perceptions, while temporary employees focus on the individual level. The results challenge the current view of safety climate as a uniform concept for all employees and prescribe boundary conditions for safety climate. It is suggested that organizations should implement "tailor-made" safety-climate practices according to the referents of employee sub-groups.

[1]  K. Lewin.  Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[2]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts , 1990 .

[3]  M E Paté-Cornell,et al.  Organizational aspects of engineering system safety: the case of offshore platforms. , 1990, Science.

[4]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment in a changing world of work. , 1998 .

[5]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments , 2003 .

[6]  E. Morrison,et al.  WHEN EMPLOYEES FEEL BETRAYED: A MODEL OF HOW PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION DEVELOPS , 1997 .

[7]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[8]  D. Zohar.  The effects of leadership dimensions, safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor injuries in work groups , 2002 .

[9]  N. Ashkanasy,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate , 2000 .

[10]  Sharon Clarke,et al.  Safety climate in an automobile manufacturing plant: The effects of work environment, job communication and safety attitudes on accidents and unsafe behaviour , 2006 .

[11]  Paul D. Bliese,et al.  Group Consensus and Psychological Well‐Being: A Large Field Study1 , 1998 .

[12]  D. Rousseau,et al.  Trends in organizational behavior , 2000 .

[13]  D. Zohar,et al.  A multilevel model of safety climate: cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  D. Zohar.  A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling , 2000 .

[16]  Kathy M. Beard,et al.  Employees at risk: Contingent work and the psychological experience of contingent workers. , 1995 .

[17]  J. Harvey,et al.  An analysis of safety culture attitudes in a highly regulated environment , 2002 .

[18]  J. Peiró,et al.  An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  B. Schneider,et al.  Climate strength: a new direction for climate research. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Gil Luria,et al.  Climate strength – How leaders form consensus , 2008 .

[21]  David A. Hofmann,et al.  A CROSS-LEVEL INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS INFLUENCING UNSAFE BEHAVIORS AND ACCIDENTS , 1996 .

[22]  B. Schneider,et al.  A passion for service: Using content analysis to explicate service climate themes. , 1992 .

[23]  Dov Zohar,et al.  Safety climate: Conceptual and measurement issues. , 2011 .

[24]  R. A. Jones,et al.  Research Methods in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 1985 .

[25]  R. Butler,et al.  The safety costs of contingent work: Evidence from Minnesota , 2001 .

[26]  Amy Buhl Conn,et al.  Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  L. James,et al.  rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. , 1993 .

[28]  S. Cox,et al.  Safety Culture: The Prediction of Commitment to Safety in the Manufacturing Industry , 1998 .

[29]  D. Zohar,et al.  Climate as a social-cognitive construction of supervisory safety practices: scripts as proxy of behavior patterns. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  A Neal,et al.  Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. , 2000, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[31]  D. Denison.  What is the Difference Between Organizational Culture and Organizational Climate? A Native's Point of View on a Decade of Paradigm Wars , 1996 .

[32]  D. Yagil,et al.  Instrumental and normative motives for compliance with traffic laws among young and older drivers. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Chun-Chia Lee,et al.  A cross-cultural study of organizational factors on safety: Japanese vs. Taiwanese oil refinery plants. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Scott Mondore,et al.  Safety climate as a mediator between foundation climates and occupational accidents: a group-level investigation. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  Howard E. A. Tinsley,et al.  Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling , 2000 .

[36]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[37]  D. Zohar.  Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. , 1980, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[39]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[40]  S. Cox,et al.  The architecture of employee attitudes to safety in the manufacturing sector , 2002 .

[41]  Lois E. Tetrick,et al.  Handbook of occupational health psychology , 2003 .

[42]  Sharon Clarke,et al.  The contemporary workforce: Implications for organisational safety culture , 2003 .