Low energy anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment

Abstract Achieving low effluent BOD5 concentrations and stable performance while treating municipal wastewater at ambient temperature has been difficult for anaerobic biotechnology without using membranes. Membrane operation has typically required energy inputs greater than traditionally needed for activated sludge aeration, thus defeating one main objective of utilizing anaerobic biotechnology. However, new low-energy membrane operational strategies are being evaluated to make anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) more energy efficient. In this study, four 3.3 L bench-scale AnMBRs using external crossflow tubular membranes were fed synthetic and real municipal wastewater at 10 and 25 °C and evaluated on the basis of energy demand and organic removal. The membranes were operated at atypically low crossflow velocities of 0.018–0.3 m/s, and with or without fluidized GAC, to reduce AnMBR energy demand. Use of GAC in membranes allowed for significant reduction in crossflow velocity without reducing membrane run-time between cleanings and resulted in energy demands of 0.05–0.13 kWh/m3. The AnMBRs were able to produce permeate BOD5≤10 mg/L at bioreactor HRTs of 4.2–9.8 h, even at 10 °C. When factoring in theoretical energy production, the AnMBR described herein is estimated to require 70–100% less energy compared to activated sludge, indicating net neutral energy demand may be feasible for BOD5 and nutrient removal from municipal wastewater.

[1]  J. Ferrer,et al.  Navigating environmental, economic, and technological trade-offs in the design and operation of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs). , 2015, Water research.

[2]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[3]  Jeonghwan Kim,et al.  Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer--can this be achieved? , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Daniel Zitomer,et al.  Ion exchange-precipitation for nutrient recovery from dilute wastewater , 2015 .

[5]  Kerry J. Howe Principles of Water Treatment , 2012 .

[6]  José Ferrer,et al.  The operating cost of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) treating sulphate-rich urban wastewater , 2014 .

[7]  S. Sung,et al.  Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor Treatment of Synthetic Municipal Wastewater at Ambient Temperature , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  Jules B. van Lier,et al.  High-rate anaerobic wastewater treatment: diversifying from end-of-the-pipe treatment to resource-oriented conversion techniques , 2008 .

[9]  J. M. Morgan-Sagastume,et al.  Biofouling and pollutant removal during long-term operation of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater , 2010, Biofouling.

[10]  Shihwu Sung,et al.  Anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of synthetic municipal wastewater at ambient temperature. , 2009, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[11]  D. Jeison,et al.  Application of two-phase slug-flow regime to control flux reduction on anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating wastewaters with high suspended solids concentration , 2011 .

[12]  Qiong Zhang,et al.  Energy-nutrients-water nexus: integrated resource recovery in municipal wastewater treatment plants. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  Jules B. van Lier,et al.  A review of anaerobic membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: Integration options, limitations and expectations , 2013 .

[14]  Steven J Skerlos,et al.  Psychrophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater. , 2013, Water research.

[15]  W. Verstraete,et al.  ZeroWasteWater: short-cycling of wastewater resources for sustainable cities of the future , 2011 .

[16]  K. Pagilla,et al.  Aerobic and Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors for Municipal Wastewater Treatment , 2006, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[17]  David C. Stuckey,et al.  Recent developments in anaerobic membrane reactors. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[18]  Jaeho Bae,et al.  Anaerobic fluidized bed membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  David M. Bagley,et al.  Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors: Applications and Research Directions , 2006 .

[20]  B. Rittmann,et al.  Development and experimental evaluation of a steady‐state, multispecies biofilm model , 1992, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  Steven J Skerlos,et al.  Perspectives on anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater: a critical review. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[22]  Jaeho Bae,et al.  Pilot-scale temperate-climate treatment of domestic wastewater with a staged anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR). , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[23]  G Lettinga,et al.  Challenge of psychrophilic anaerobic wastewater treatment. , 2001, Trends in biotechnology.

[24]  D. Zitomer,et al.  Reduced energy demand for municipal wastewater recovery using an anaerobic floating filter membrane bioreactor , 2016 .

[25]  C. Visvanathan,et al.  Effect of organic loading rate on VFA production, organic matter removal and microbial activity of a two-stage thermophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[26]  Steven J Skerlos,et al.  Navigating wastewater energy recovery strategies: a life cycle comparison of anaerobic membrane bioreactor and conventional treatment systems with anaerobic digestion. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  M. Pidou,et al.  Modelling the energy demands of aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment , 2011, Environmental technology.

[28]  P Cornel,et al.  Enhanced membrane bioreactor process without chemical cleaning. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[29]  Adalberto Noyola,et al.  Analysis of microbial communities developed on the fouling layers of a membrane-coupled anaerobic bioreactor applied to wastewater treatment. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[30]  P Cornel,et al.  Effect of mechanical cleaning with granular material on the permeability of submerged membranes in the MBR process. , 2010, Water research.

[31]  L. Raskin,et al.  Influence of cleaning frequency and membrane history on fouling in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor , 2007 .

[32]  J. M. Morgan-Sagastume,et al.  Influence of hydraulic retention time on fouling in a UASB coupled with an external ultrafiltration membrane treating synthetic municipal wastewater , 2011 .

[33]  P. Bérubé,et al.  Parameters Governing Permeate Flux in an Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor Treating Low‐Strength Municipal Wastewaters: A Literature Review , 2006, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[34]  David C. Stuckey,et al.  Flux and performance improvement in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (SAMBR) using powdered activated carbon (PAC) , 2008 .

[35]  Jeonghwan Kim,et al.  Anaerobic treatment of municipal wastewater with a staged anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor (SAF-MBR) system. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[36]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment , 2006 .

[37]  D. Stuckey,et al.  Activated Carbon Addition to a Submerged Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor: Effect on Performance, Transmembrane Pressure, and Flux , 2007 .

[38]  Oluwaseun O. Ogunbiyi,et al.  Methods Employed for Control of Fouling in MF and UF Membranes: A Comprehensive Review , 2005 .

[39]  J. B. Giménez,et al.  Impact of temperature on feed-flow characteristics and filtration performance of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket coupled ultrafiltration membrane treating municipal wastewater. , 2015, Water research.

[40]  A. Drews,et al.  Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. , 2009, Water research.

[41]  Eric R. Hall Membrane Bioreactors For Anaerobic Treatment Of Wastewaters , 2007 .