Factors Affecting Housing Developers' Readiness to Adopt Innovative Systems

To tackle the problem of abandoned housing projects and improve the quality of housing, the Malaysian Government has proposed a new housing delivery system known as Build Then Sell (BTS). To encourage BTS, the government has introduced a fast-track planning approval process, a waiver of a deposit for a developer's license and an exemption for low-cost houses. However, many developers are reluctant to implement BTS. This study aims to identify factors that influence housing developers’ readiness to implement BTS. Readiness theory has been used to construct a housing developer BTS readiness model. A questionnaire-based survey was carried out with developers in the major cities of Malaysia. Statistical analyses such as descriptive analysis and multiple regression analysis were used to analyse the data. The findings here revealed that external support and market readiness are the two most important factors influencing Malaysian developers’ readiness to implement BTS. This implies that reassessing government incentives, educating home buyers about BTS and improving the role of finance institutions will help to facilitate the implementation of BTS in Malaysia.

[1]  Workplace Readiness for Communicating Diversity , 1996 .

[2]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Julie F. Pallant,et al.  SPSS Survival Manual , 2020 .

[4]  T. Ramayah,et al.  Readiness to Adopt Data Mining Technologies: An Exploratory Study of Telecommunication Employees in Malaysia , 2002, PAKM.

[5]  Mohd Wira Mohd Shafiei,et al.  Strategies to implement the “build then sell” housing delivery system in Malaysia , 2010 .

[6]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[7]  S. Harris,et al.  Creating Readiness for Organizational Change , 1993 .

[8]  Jackie Alexander Di Pofi Organizational diagnostics: integrating qualitative and quantitative methodology , 2002 .

[9]  Robert D. Russell,et al.  Developing a Process Model of Intrapreneurial Systems: A Cognitive Mapping Approach , 1999 .

[10]  Somboon Kulvisaechana Human capital development in the international organization: rhetoric and reality , 2006 .

[11]  R. Fincher Is High-rise Housing Innovative? Developers' Contradictory Narratives of High-rise Housing in Melbourne , 2007 .

[12]  J. Barlow,et al.  From Craft Production to Mass Customisation. Innovation Requirements for the UK Housebuilding Industry , 1999 .

[13]  John C. Narver,et al.  Market Orientation and the Learning Organization , 1995 .

[14]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[15]  D. Hes,et al.  Sustainability Uptake in Housing in Metropolitan Australia: An Institutional Problem, Not a Technological One , 2009 .

[16]  今井 賢一,et al.  Managing the new product development process : how Japanese companies learn and unlearn , 1984 .

[17]  Sandra Streukens,et al.  The effect of service employees' technology readiness on technology acceptance , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Alan Hooper,et al.  Contemporary Change and the Housebuilding Industry: Concentration and Standardisation in Production , 1999 .

[19]  Mustafa C. Ungan Manufacturing best practices: implementation success factors and performance , 2007 .

[20]  Grover S. Kearns,et al.  The impact of industry contextual factors on IT focus and the use of IT for competitive advantage , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  Industrial Innovation: Success,Strategy, Trends , 1995 .

[22]  Heather A. Haveman Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation , 1992 .

[23]  Quy Nguyen Huy,et al.  Emotional Capability, Emotional Intelligence, and Radical Change , 1999 .

[24]  Michael Ball,et al.  Chasing a Snail: Innovation and Housebuilding Firms' Strategies , 1999 .

[25]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[26]  L. Eby,et al.  Perceptions of Organizational Readiness for Change: Factors Related to Employees' Reactions to the Implementation of Team-Based Selling , 2000 .

[27]  G. Day The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[28]  Murray Sinclair,et al.  A framework for organisational readiness for knowledge management , 2004 .

[29]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. , 1990 .

[30]  Cagamas Berhad Housing the nation : a definitive study , 1997 .

[31]  M. Beer,et al.  Organization Change and Development , 1987 .

[32]  Achilles A. Armenakis,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Definition of Readiness for Change: A Review of Research and Instrumentation , 2007 .

[33]  A. Bedeian,et al.  Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990s , 1999 .

[34]  J. T. Voordijk,et al.  Modular Approaches in Dutch House Building: An Exploratory Survey , 2008 .

[35]  D. Slevin,et al.  New Venture Strategic Posture, Structure, and Performance: An Industry Life Cycle Analysis , 1990 .

[36]  Dana M. Johnson,et al.  Adaptation of organizational change models to the implementation of quality standard requirements , 2004 .

[37]  Tim Venables,et al.  Will technological innovation create the true lifetime home? , 2004 .

[38]  M. Sikanda Organisational behaviour and management , 2011 .

[39]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[40]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  Teclmological Collaboration and Innovation , 1995 .

[41]  James A. Roberts,et al.  Organizational variables, sales force perceptions of readiness for change, learning, and performance among boundary-spanning teams: A conceptual framework and propositions for research , 2004 .

[42]  K. Gibb Regional Differentiation and the Scottish Private Housebuilding Sector , 1999 .

[43]  D. Teece Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .