Alive and kicking–but will Quality Management be around tomorrow? A Swedish academia perspective

The purpose of this article is to describe how Quality Management (QM) is perceived today by scholars at three Swedish universities, and into what QM is expected to develop into in twenty years. Data were collected through structured workshops using affinity diagrams with scholars teaching and performing research in the QM field. The results show that QM currently is perceived as consisting of a set of core of principles, methods and tools. The future outlook includes three possible development directions for QM are seen: [1] searching for a “discipline X” where QM can contribute while keeping its toolbox, [2] focus on a core based on the traditional quality technology toolbox with methods and tools, and [3] a risk that QM, as it is today, may seize to exist and be diffused into other disciplines.

[1]  Kerstin Sahlin,et al.  Circulating ideas : Imitation, translation and editing , 2008 .

[2]  Thomas H. Lee,et al.  A New American Tqm: Four Practical Revolutions In Management , 1993 .

[3]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[4]  R. Boaden.  What is total quality management...and does it matter , 1997 .

[5]  Jens J. Dahlgaard,et al.  Fundamentals of Total Quality Management , 2005 .

[6]  Jost Hamschmidt,et al.  ISO 14001: profitable? Yes! But is it eco-effective? , 2006 .

[7]  Paul Lillrank,et al.  The Transfer of Management Innovations from Japan , 1995 .

[8]  B. Dale,et al.  Total Quality Management: Is it a Fad, Fashion, or Fit? , 2000 .

[9]  S. Barley,et al.  Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. , 1992 .

[10]  Totti Könnölä,et al.  (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/bse.487 Really Changing the Course: the Limitations of Environmental Management Systems for Innovation , 2022 .

[11]  Staffan Furusten,et al.  Popular Management Books: How they are made and what they mean for organisations , 1999 .

[12]  M Williams,et al.  Managing Quality , 2018 .

[13]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Total Quality Management: The Route to Improving Performance , 1993 .

[14]  Thomas Zobel,et al.  Characterisation of environmental policy implementation in an EMS context : a multiple-case study in Sweden , 2008 .

[15]  Ismail Sila,et al.  An investigation of the total quality management survey based research published between 1989 and 2000: A literature review , 2002 .

[16]  Petrus Kautto,et al.  New instruments – old practices? The implications of environmental management systems and extended producer responsibility for design for the environment , 2006 .

[17]  Jörgen Eklund,et al.  Quality Improvement activities in Swedish industry : Drivers, approaches and outcomes , 2010 .

[18]  J. Dean,et al.  MANAGEMENT THEORY AND TOTAL QUALITY: IMPROVING RESEARCH AND PRACTICE THROUGH THEORY DEVELOPMENT , 1994 .

[19]  Sylvain Landry,et al.  Schools of Thought in and against Total Quality , 1998 .

[20]  A. Martinuzzi,et al.  ISO 14001 – experiences, effects and future challenges: a national study in Austria , 2007 .

[21]  S. Arnott,et al.  Schools of thought , 1985, Nature.

[22]  A. Wilkinson,et al.  Rethinking total quality management , 2001 .

[23]  B. Bergquist,et al.  TQM: terrific quality marvel or tragic quality malpractice? , 2005 .

[24]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism , 2017 .

[25]  Thomas Zobel.  Exploring the influence of organisational chacteristics on benefits of environmental management systems , 2010 .

[26]  B. Klefsjö,et al.  TQM as a management system consisting of values, techniques and tools , 2000 .

[27]  Thomas Pyzdek.  A Road Map for Quality Beyond Control , 1999 .

[28]  Jostein Pettersen,et al.  Defining Lean Production : Some conceptual and practical issues , 2008 .

[29]  W. Bryan,et al.  What is Total Quality Management , 1996 .