Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents

Optimal use of encapsulated microbubbles for ultrasound contrast agents and drug delivery requires an understanding of the complex set of phenomena that affect the contrast agent echo and persistence. With the use of a video microscopy system coupled to either an ultrasound flow phantom or a chamber for insonifying stationary bubbles, we show that ultrasound has significant effects on encapsulated microbubbles. In vitro studies show that a train of ultrasound pulses can alter the structure of an albumin-shelled bubble, initiate various mechanisms of bubble destruction or produce aggregation that changes the echo spectrum. In this analysis, changes observed optically are compared with those observed acoustically for both albumin and lipid-shelled agents. We show that, when insonified with a narrowband pulse at an acoustic pressure of several hundred kPa, a phospholipid-shelled bubble can undergo net radius fluctuations of at least 15%; and an albumin-shelled bubble initially demonstrates constrained expansion and contraction. If the albumin shell contains air, the shell may not initially experience surface tension; therefore, the echo changes more significantly with repeated pulsing. A set of observations of contrast agent destruction is presented, which includes the slow diffusion of gas through the shell and formation of a shell defect followed by rapid diffusion of gas into the surrounding liquid. These observations demonstrate that the low-solubility gas used in these agents can persist for several hundred milliseconds in solution. With the transmission of a high-pulse repetition rate and a low pressure, the echoes from, contrast agents can be affected by secondary radiation force. Secondary radiation force is an attractive force for these experimental conditions, creating aggregates with distinct echo characteristics and extended persistence. The scattered echo from an aggregate is several times stronger and more narrowband than echoes from individual bubbles.

[1]  S. Mulvagh,et al.  Recent advances in myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 2001, Current opinion in cardiology.

[2]  K. Nightingale,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  S. Kaul,et al.  Recent advances in myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 1997, Current opinion in cardiology.

[4]  P. Dayton,et al.  Simultaneous optical and acoustical observations of contrast agents , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[5]  P. Dayton,et al.  Properties of contrast agents insonified at frequencies above 10 MHz , 1996, 1996 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings.

[6]  E. Eger,et al.  Molecular properties of the "ideal" inhaled anesthetic: studies of fluorinated methanes, ethanes, propanes, and butanes. , 1994, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[7]  T. Leighton.  The Acoustic Bubble , 1994 .

[8]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Acoustic properties of ultrasound contrast agents , 1993 .

[9]  Xiaoyu Zheng,et al.  Acoustic interaction forces between two fluid spheres in an acoustic field , 1993 .

[10]  C. P. Lee,et al.  Acoustic radiation force on a bubble , 1993 .

[11]  Lawrence A. Crum,et al.  Bjerknes forces on bubbles in a stationary sound field , 1975 .

[12]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Targeting of ultrasound contrast material. An in vitro feasibility study. , 1997, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.

[13]  Herbert Lawrence Anderson,et al.  A physicist's desk reference , 1989 .