A Diffusion Network Event History Estimator

Research on the diffusion of political decisions across jurisdictions typically accounts for units ’ in fl uence over each other with (1) observable measures or (2) by inferring latent network ties from past decisions. The former approach assumes that interdependence is static and perfectly captured by the data. The latter mitigates these issues but requires analytical tools that are separate from the main empirical methods for studying diffusion. As a solution, we introduce network event history analysis (NEHA), which incorporates latent network inference into conventional discrete-time event history models. We demonstrate NEHA ’ s unique methodological and substantive bene fi ts in applications to policy adoption in the American states. Researchers can analyze the ties and structure of inferred networks to re fi ne model speci fi cations, evaluate diffusion mechanisms, or test new or existing hypotheses. By capturing targeted relationships unexplained by standard covariates, NEHA can improve models, facilitate richer theoretical development, and permit novel analyses of the diffusion process.

[1]  F. Boehmke,et al.  The Initiative Process and Policy Innovation in the American States , 2021, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[2]  J. Tallberg,et al.  Why International Organizations Commit to Liberal Norms , 2020 .

[3]  Daniel J. Mallinson,et al.  Policy Innovation Adoption Across the Diffusion Life Course , 2020 .

[4]  Hanna M. Wallach,et al.  SPID: A New Database for Inferring Public Policy Innovativeness and Diffusion Networks , 2020, Policy Studies Journal.

[5]  Srinivas C. Parinandi Policy Inventing and Borrowing among State Legislatures , 2020 .

[6]  Scott J. LaCombe,et al.  The Ties that Bind Us: The Influence of Perceived State Similarity on Policy Diffusion , 2020, Political Research Quarterly.

[7]  Daniel J. Mallinson,et al.  Who Are Your Neighbors? The Role of Ideology and Decline of Geographic Proximity in the Diffusion of Policy Innovations , 2019, Policy Studies Journal.

[8]  Jeffrey J. Harden,et al.  Replications in Context: A Framework for Evaluating New Methods in Quantitative Political Science , 2018, Political Analysis.

[9]  Bruce A. Desmarais,et al.  Text as Policy: Measuring Policy Similarity through Bill Text Reuse , 2018, Policy Studies Journal.

[10]  A. Weil,et al.  Diffusion of Innovation , 2020, The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology.

[11]  Jeffrey J. Harden,et al.  The Seeds of Policy Change: Leveraging Diffusion to Disseminate Policy Innovations. , 2017, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[12]  Bruce A. Desmarais,et al.  What Can We Learn from Predictive Modeling? , 2016, Political Analysis.

[13]  F. Gilardi Four Ways We Can Improve Policy Diffusion Research , 2016, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[14]  Graeme T. Boushey Targeted for Diffusion? How the Use and Acceptance of Stereotypes Shape the Diffusion of Criminal Justice Policy Innovations in the American States , 2016, American Political Science Review.

[15]  Neal D. Woods,et al.  Policy Diffusion and the Pro-innovation Bias , 2016 .

[16]  R. Hinkle Into the Words: Using Statutory Text to Explore the Impact of Federal Courts on State Policy Diffusion , 2015 .

[17]  Joshua M. Jansa,et al.  Interest Group Influence in Policy Diffusion Networks , 2015, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[18]  Jeffrey J. Harden,et al.  Persistent Policy Pathways: Inferring Diffusion Networks in the American States , 2015, American Political Science Review.

[19]  M. Maggetti,et al.  Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms , 2015, Journal of Public Policy.

[20]  Rebecca J. Kreitzer Politics and Morality in State Abortion Policy , 2015, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[21]  Gerald A. Edgar,et al.  Problems and Solutions , 2015, Am. Math. Mon..

[22]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science , 2012, British Journal of Political Science.

[23]  F. Boehmke,et al.  State Policy Innovativeness Revisited , 2012, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[24]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Inferring networks of diffusion and influence , 2010, KDD.

[25]  Lahny R. Silva Clean Slate: Expanding Expungements and Pardons for Non-Violent Federal Offenders , 2010 .

[26]  Philip J. Cook,et al.  Public Safety Through Private Action: An Economic Assessment of Bids, Locks, and Citizen Cooperation , 2010 .

[27]  R. Cook,et al.  Likelihood-Based Sufficient Dimension Reduction , 2009 .

[28]  Christine Min Wotipka,et al.  Global Human Rights and State Sovereignty: State Ratification of International Human Rights Treaties, 1965–20011 , 2008 .

[29]  Charles R. Shipan,et al.  The mechanisms of policy diffusion , 2008 .

[30]  F. Gilardi,et al.  Empirical Modeling of Policy Diffusion in Federal States: The Dyadic Approach , 2008 .

[31]  C. Volden,et al.  States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children's Health Insurance Program , 2006 .

[32]  Sarah M. Brooks Interdependent and Domestic Foundations of Policy Change: The Diffusion of Pension Privatization Around the World , 2005 .

[33]  R. Otto,et al.  Juvenile Delinquency: Prevention, Assessment and Intervention , 2005 .

[34]  Lin Wang,et al.  The Gini Coefficient's Application to General Complex Networks , 2005, Adv. Complex Syst..

[35]  David A. Peterson,et al.  Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion , 2004 .

[36]  Keith T. Poole,et al.  Measuring Bias and Uncertainty in Ideal Point Estimates via the Parametric Bootstrap , 2004, Political Analysis.

[37]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists , 2004 .

[38]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[39]  Virginia Gray,et al.  Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[40]  Jack L. Walker The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States , 1969, American Political Science Review.