Untangling dimensions of middle school students' beliefs about scientific knowledge and science learning

Responses to a written beliefs test for 178 eighth grade students and interviews with a subset of the students are analysed to investigate students' beliefs about the tentativeness of scientific knowledge and about the autonomy and strategies appropriate for science learning. These three dimensions of beliefs are salient because they align with the image of science teaching promoted by current reform movements. Analyses focus on change in beliefs and relationships among dimensions of beliefs and between those beliefs and students' understandings of science concepts. Results show that students' beliefs do not change much during the one-semester course. Students who view scientific knowledge as tentative also try to understand science. Autonomous students do not hold the most productive learning strategies, though students with low autonomy develop significantly less coherent understandings of science concepts. Instructional implications focus on potential roles of teachers and technology in promoting productive beliefs about scientific knowledge and science learning. Implications for individualized instruction follow classroom-level implications.

[1]  P. Pintrich,et al.  The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning , 1997 .

[2]  Philip Bell,et al.  Designing Mildred: Scaffolding Students' Reflection and Argumentation Using a Cognitive Software Guide , 2000 .

[3]  Leopold E. Klopfer,et al.  The history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists: A report on the HOSG instruction project , 1963 .

[4]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development , 1990 .

[5]  Gary D. Fenstermacher.  The Knower and the Known: The Nature of Knowledge in Research on Teaching , 1994 .

[6]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE , 2000 .

[7]  B. Weiner,et al.  Theories and principles of motivation. , 1996 .

[8]  John Leach,et al.  UNDERGRADUATE SCIENCE STUDENTS' IMAGES OF SCIENCE , 1999 .

[9]  W. Firestone.  Meaning in Method: The Rhetoric of Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 1987 .

[10]  M. Linn,et al.  How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? , 1991 .

[11]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  How do students make sense of science , 1993 .

[12]  Susan Carey,et al.  `An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': a study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge , 1989 .

[13]  D. C. Sutterley,et al.  Womenʼs Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind , 1987 .

[14]  A. Schoenfeld.  Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint) , 2009 .

[15]  R. Hackett.  Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[16]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge , 1978 .

[17]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  APPROACHES TO STUDYING AND LEVELS OF PROCESSING IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS , 1988 .

[18]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments , 1996, CHI.

[19]  J. Novak.  The Pursuit of a Dream: Education Can Be Improved , 2005 .

[20]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework , 1995 .

[21]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Making Science Accessible to All: Results of a Design Experiment in Inclusive Classrooms , 2001 .

[22]  D. Perkins,et al.  Beyond Abilities: A Dispositional Theory of Thinking. , 1993 .

[23]  Marlene Schommer.  Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. , 1990 .

[24]  E. Davis.  Prompting Middle School Science Students for Productive Reflection: Generic and Directed Prompts , 2003 .

[25]  N. Allen,et al.  Voices from the Bridge: Worldview Conflicts of Kickapoo Students of Science. , 1998 .

[26]  Elizabeth Anna Davis.  Scaffolding students' reflection for science learning , 1998 .

[27]  Marlene Schommer.  Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. , 1993 .

[28]  J. Dewey.  How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[29]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[30]  M. R. Matthews.  Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science , 1994 .

[31]  M. Belenky,et al.  Women's ways of knowing : the development of self, voice, and mind , 1988 .

[32]  E. Yalow.  On Educational psychology: A cognitive view. , 1979 .

[33]  Marlene Schommer,et al.  Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions , 1994 .

[34]  Marlene Schommer,et al.  The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students : A longitudinal study , 1997 .

[35]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[36]  Susan Carey,et al.  On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge , 1993 .

[37]  A. Ryan,et al.  Students' Preconceptions about the Epistemology of Science , 1992 .

[38]  David Hammer,et al.  Epistemological Beliefs in Introductory Physics , 1994 .

[39]  Andrew Elby,et al.  On the Form of a Personal Epistemology , 2002 .

[40]  J. Novak,et al.  A Twelve-Year Longitudinal Study of Science Concept Learning , 1991 .

[41]  Philip Bell,et al.  Using the Internet to Enhance Student Understanding of Science: The Knowledge Integration Environment , 1998, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[42]  Sally Sieloff Magnan,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[43]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The case for case studies of programming problems , 1992, CACM.

[44]  P. Pintrich.  Multiple Goals, Multiple Pathways: The Role of Goal Orientation in Learning and Achievement. , 2000 .

[45]  John S. Lochrie.  Perry revisited—A fresh look at Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years , 1989 .

[46]  J. Levin.  Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners , 2003 .

[47]  K. Kitchener,et al.  Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. , 2009 .

[48]  Okhee Lee.  Scientific Literacy for All: What Is It, and How Can We Achieve It?. , 1997 .

[49]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[50]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[51]  Lindsay D. Mackay,et al.  Development of understanding about the nature of science , 1971 .

[52]  Carole A. Ames,et al.  Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students' Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes , 1988 .

[53]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[54]  Philip Bell,et al.  The knowledge integration environment: theory and design , 1995, CSCL.