Invasive Africanized honeybees change the structure of native pollination networks in Brazil

The Africanized honeybee Apis mellifera (AHB) is an invasive species spread over all Brazilian biomes, which has negative impacts on native bee populations, but whose impacts on native plants are still controversial. In order to understand how its impacts extend to the pollination service at the community level, we studied the AHB and its interactions in a multi-species context using network theory. We analyzed six pollination networks from the Brazilian Caatinga, a xeric biome where beekeeping is increasing very quickly. The AHB occupied a central position in all networks, as it was responsible for a large share of the interactions observed (14 ± 7 %) and bound together different modules. By simulating the removal of the AHB from each network, we observed no effects on connectance, but a strong decrease in nestedness (−23 ± 19 %) and an increase in modularity (8 ± 5 %). The robustness of networks to cumulative random extinctions was on average not affected. In summary, our evidence points out that the AHB induces significant changes in the structure of native pollination networks, mainly by making them more cohesive and monopolizing many interactions. Although the AHB did not affect network robustness, its net impact on the pollination service may be negative, because this invasive species is very generalistic and may not be an efficient pollinator for some native plants.

[1]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  C. Michener The Brazilian bee problem. , 1975, Annual review of entomology.

[3]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Darien E. Prado,et al.  Patterns of Species Distributions in the Dry Seasonal Forests of South America , 1993 .

[5]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Predicting invasion success in complex ecological networks , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .

[7]  C. O'toole,et al.  The conservation of bees. , 1996 .

[8]  P. Neumann,et al.  Endosymbionts and honey bee colony losses? , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  J. Olesen,et al.  Impact of introduced honey bees on native pollination interactions of the endemic Echium wildpretii (Boraginaceae) on Tenerife, Canary Islands , 2004 .

[10]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  The Missing Part of Seed Dispersal Networks: Structure and Robustness of Bat-Fruit Interactions , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  J. Madsen Predicting invasion success of Eurasian watermilfoil. , 1998 .

[12]  V. B. Huryn Ecological Impacts of Introduced Honey Bees , 1997, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[13]  Jane Memmott,et al.  The impact of an alien plant on a native plant-pollinator network: an experimental approach. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[14]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[15]  R. Paxton,et al.  The conservation of bees: a global perspective , 2009, Apidologie.

[16]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  CONNECTANCE OF BRAZILIAN SOCIAL BEE - FOOD PLANT NET- WORKS IS INFLUENCED BY HABITAT, BUT NOT BY LATITUDE, ALTI- TUDE OR NETWORK SIZE. , 2005 .

[17]  Horacio Ceva,et al.  Why nestedness in mutualistic networks? , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[19]  B. Walker Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .

[20]  N. Waser,et al.  Overplaying the role of honey bees as pollinators: a comment on Aebi and Neumann (2011). , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  J. Olesen,et al.  Impact of Alien Plant Invaders on Pollination Networks in Two Archipelagos , 2009, PloS one.

[22]  Bethany S. Dohleman Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek , 2006 .

[23]  R. Didham,et al.  Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Marco A. R. Mello,et al.  Pollination networks of oil-flowers: a tiny world within the smallest of all worlds. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[25]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Patterns of Mutualistic Interactions in Pollination and Seed Dispersal: Connectance, Dependence Asymmetries, and Coevolution , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[26]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks , 2008 .

[27]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[28]  Darien E. Prado SEASONALLY DRY FORESTS OF TROPICAL SOUTH AMERICA: FROM FORGOTTEN ECOSYSTEMS TO A NEW PHYTOGEOGRAPHIC UNIT , 2000 .

[29]  B. JacobusC.,et al.  The structure of eusocial bee assemblages in Brazil , 2006 .

[30]  Juan M Morales,et al.  Invasive Mutualists Erode Native Pollination Webs , 2008, PLoS biology.

[31]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity , 2009, Nature.

[32]  Celso Feitosa Martins,et al.  FENOLOGIA E PREFERÊNCIA ALIMENTAR DE CEBLURGUS LONGIPALPIS URBAN E MOURE, 1993 (HYMENOPTERA, HALICTIDAE, DUFOUREINAE) , 1994 .

[33]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks , 2005, Nature.

[34]  Arthur Cronquist,et al.  Floristic Regions of the World , 1978 .

[35]  Paulo R Guimarães,et al.  Cheaters in mutualism networks , 2010, Biology Letters.

[36]  Celso Feitosa Martins,et al.  RECURSO FLORAIS UTILIZADOS POR ABELHAS (HYMENOPTERA, APOIDEA) EM ÁREA DE CAATINGA (SÃO JOÃO DO CARIRI, PARAÍBA) , 1995 .

[37]  D. Andrade-Lima,et al.  The caatinga dominium , 1981 .

[38]  D. Goulson Effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems , 2003 .

[39]  C. M. L. Aguiar Utilização de recursos florais por abelhas (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) em uma área de Caatinga (Itatim, Bahia, Brasil) , 2003 .

[40]  J. Olesen,et al.  Ecological modules and roles of species in heathland plant-insect flower visitor networks. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[41]  D. vanEngelsdorp,et al.  Back to the future: Apis versus non-Apis pollination - a response to Ollerton et al. , 2012 .

[42]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  The modularity of seed dispersal: differences in structure and robustness between bat– and bird–fruit networks , 2011, Oecologia.

[43]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[44]  J. C. D. Silva,et al.  Ecologia e conservação da caatinga , 2003 .

[45]  Paulo Guimarães,et al.  Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[46]  M. Aizen,et al.  HABITAT FRAGMENTATION, NATIVE INSECT POLLINATORS, AND FERAL HONEY BEES IN ARGENTINE, "CHACO SERRANO"' , 1994 .

[47]  J. Blondel Guilds or functional groups: does it matter? , 2003 .