Mathematical modeling of GATA-switching for regulating the differentiation of hematopoietic stem cell

BackgroundHematopoiesis is a highly orchestrated developmental process that comprises various developmental stages of the hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). During development, the decision to leave the self-renewing state and selection of a differentiation pathway is regulated by a number of transcription factors. Among them, genes GATA-1 and PU.1 form a core negative feedback module to regulate the genetic switching between the cell fate choices of HSCs. Although extensive experimental studies have revealed the mechanisms to regulate the expression of these two genes, it is still unclear how this simple module regulates the genetic switching.MethodsIn this work we proposed a mathematical model to study the mechanisms of the GATA-PU.1 gene network in the determination of HSC differentiation pathways. We incorporated the mechanisms of GATA switch into the module, and developed a mathematical model that comprises three genes GATA-1, GATA-2 and PU.1. In addition, a novel multiple-objective optimization method was designed to infer unknown parameters in the proposed model by realizing different experimental observations. A stochastic model was also designed to describe the critical function of noise, due to the small copy numbers of molecular species, in determining the differentiation pathways.ResultsThe proposed deterministic model has successfully realized three stable steady states representing the priming and different progenitor cells as well as genetic switching between the genetic states under various experimental conditions. Using different values of GATA-1 synthesis rate for the GATA-1 protein availability in the chromatin sites during the time period of GATA switch, stochastic simulations for the first time have realized different proportions of cells leading to different developmental pathways under various experimental conditions.ConclusionsMathematical models provide testable predictions regarding the mechanisms and conditions for realizing different differentiation pathways of hematopoietic stem cells. This work represents the first attempt at using a discrete stochastic model to realize the decision of HSC differentiation pathways showing a multimodal distribution.

[1]  Elaine Dzierzak,et al.  GATA-2 Plays Two Functionally Distinct Roles during the Ontogeny of Hematopoietic Stem Cells , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[2]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells , 2008, Nature.

[3]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Biological robustness , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  Howard Cedar,et al.  Epigenetics of haematopoietic cell development , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[5]  Junbin Gao,et al.  Simulated maximum likelihood method for estimating kinetic rates in gene expression , 2007, Bioinform..

[6]  J. D. Engel,et al.  DNA-binding specificities of the GATA transcription factor family , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[7]  Masayuki Yamamoto,et al.  GATA factor switching during erythroid differentiation , 2010, Current opinion in hematology.

[8]  Ingo Roeder,et al.  Towards an understanding of lineage specification in hematopoietic stem cells: a mathematical model for the interaction of transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Rainer Breitling,et al.  What is Systems Biology? , 2010, Front. Physiology.

[10]  H. Beug,et al.  Acetylation and MAPK phosphorylation cooperate to regulate the degradation of active GATA-1. , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[11]  T. Graf,et al.  Heterogeneity of embryonic and adult stem cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[12]  D. Amanatullah,et al.  PU.1 inhibits the erythroid program by binding to GATA‐1 on DNA and creating a repressive chromatin structure , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[13]  Min Ye,et al.  Myeloid or lymphoid promiscuity as a critical step in hematopoietic lineage commitment. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[14]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[15]  S. Orkin,et al.  PU.1 inhibits GATA-1 function and erythroid differentiation by blocking GATA-1 DNA binding. , 2000, Blood.

[16]  Masayuki Yamamoto,et al.  Dynamic regulation of Gata factor levels is more important than their identity , 2007 .

[17]  H. Kitano.  Towards a theory of biological robustness , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[18]  Masayuki Yamamoto,et al.  GATA1 Function, a Paradigm for Transcription Factors in Hematopoiesis , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[19]  J. Raser,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control , 2005, Science.

[20]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Nature, Nurture, or Chance: Stochastic Gene Expression and Its Consequences , 2008, Cell.

[21]  K. Burrage,et al.  Bistability and switching in the lysis/lysogeny genetic regulatory network of bacteriophage lambda. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  D. Saluja,et al.  PU.1 and partners: regulation of haematopoietic stem cell fate in normal and malignant haematopoiesis , 2009, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[23]  Santhosh Palani,et al.  Integrating Extrinsic and Intrinsic Cues into a Minimal Model of Lineage Commitment for Hematopoietic Progenitors , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  Pu Zhang,et al.  Potential Autoregulation of Transcription Factor PU.1 by an Upstream Regulatory Element , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[25]  Stuart H. Orkin,et al.  GATA-2 Reinforces Megakaryocyte Development in the Absence of GATA-1 , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[26]  Elinore M Mercer,et al.  Factors and networks that underpin early hematopoiesis. , 2011, Seminars in immunology.

[27]  C. Trainor,et al.  A GATA Box in the GATA-1 Gene Hematopoietic Enhancer Is a Critical Element in the Network of GATA Factors and Sites That Regulate This Gene , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[28]  Pavol Bokes,et al.  A bistable genetic switch which does not require high co-operativity at the promoter: a two-timescale model for the PU.1-GATA-1 interaction. , 2009, Mathematical medicine and biology : a journal of the IMA.

[29]  Jing Wu,et al.  GATA-1-dependent transcriptional repression of GATA-2 via disruption of positive autoregulation and domain-wide chromatin remodeling , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Cellular Decision Making and Biological Noise: From Microbes to Mammals , 2011, Cell.

[31]  Lewis C. Cantley,et al.  Cell-to-Cell Variability in PI3K Protein Level Regulates PI3K-AKT Pathway Activity in Cell Populations , 2011, Current Biology.

[32]  D. Hume,et al.  Probability in transcriptional regulation and its implications for leukocyte differentiation and inducible gene expression. , 2000, Blood.

[33]  J. Collins,et al.  Programmable cells: interfacing natural and engineered gene networks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[35]  I. Weissman,et al.  A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages , 2000, Nature.

[36]  A. Friedman.  Transcriptional control of granulocyte and monocyte development , 2007, Oncogene.

[37]  Julianne D. Halley,et al.  A General Model for Binary Cell Fate Decision Gene Circuits with Degeneracy: Indeterminacy and Switch Behavior in the Absence of Cooperativity , 2011, PloS one.

[38]  Merlin Crossley,et al.  Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  N Assa-Munt,et al.  Mutants of ETS domain PU.1 and GGAA/T recognition: Free energies and kinetics , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[40]  Emery H. Bresnick,et al.  GATA Switches as Developmental Drivers* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  D. Wilkinson.  Stochastic modelling for quantitative description of heterogeneous biological systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[42]  Kate Smith-Miles,et al.  Mathematical modelling of stem cell differentiation: the PU.1–GATA-1 interaction , 2012, Journal of mathematical biology.

[43]  T. Stopka,et al.  The role of PU.1 and GATA-1 transcription factors during normal and leukemogenic hematopoiesis , 2010, Leukemia.

[44]  Ross C. Hardison,et al.  Graded repression of PU.1/Sfpi1 gene transcription by GATA factors regulates hematopoietic cell fate. , 2009, Blood.

[45]  Tohru Fujiwara,et al.  Context-dependent function of "GATA switch" sites in vivo. , 2011, Blood.

[46]  Sui Huang,et al.  Bifurcation dynamics in lineage-commitment in bipotent progenitor cells. , 2007, Developmental biology.

[47]  Carlos M. Fonseca,et al.  GENETIC ALGORITHM TOOLS FOR CONTROL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING , 1994 .

[48]  Chen Chen,et al.  Revealing metabolite biomarkers for acupuncture treatment by linear programming based feature selection , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[49]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Hierarchical Differentiation of Myeloid Progenitors Is Encoded in the Transcription Factor Network , 2011, PloS one.

[50]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Computational Modeling of the Hematopoietic Erythroid-Myeloid Switch Reveals Insights into Cooperativity, Priming, and Irreversibility , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  John J Tyson,et al.  Functional motifs in biochemical reaction networks. , 2010, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[52]  A. Skoultchi,et al.  Reprogramming Leukemia Cells to Terminal Differentiation and Growth Arrest by RNA Interference of PU.1 , 2007, Molecular Cancer Research.

[53]  L. Doré,et al.  Transcription factor networks in erythroid cell and megakaryocyte development. , 2011, Blood.

[54]  Rodolfo Ghirlando,et al.  Determinants of GATA-1 Binding to DNA , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[55]  K. Burrage,et al.  Stochastic models for regulatory networks of the genetic toggle switch. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  A. Goldfarb,et al.  Transcriptional control of megakaryocyte development , 2007, Oncogene.

[57]  M. A. Shea,et al.  The OR control system of bacteriophage lambda. A physical-chemical model for gene regulation. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.