Detection of intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at 3T.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The spatial resolution of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA) can be improved within a reasonable examination time by combining 3T and sensitivity encoding technique. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of high-resolution 3D TOF-MRA at 3T in patients with suspected atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease of the intracranial arteries. MATERIALS AND METHODS We assessed 160 arteries in 39 patients: 68 distal internal carotid arteries, 68 middle cerebral arteries, and 24 vertebrobasilar arteries. The measured voxel size of 3D TOF-MRA was 0.28 x 0.56 x 1.2 mm(3). Steno-occlusive disease was assessed independently by 2 observers using conventional angiography as the reference standard. RESULTS According to observers 1 and 2, respectively, 3D TOF-MRA at 3T had a sensitivity of 78%/85% (21/27, 23/27), a specificity of 95%/95% (126/133, 127/133), a positive predictive value of 75%/79% (21/28, 23/29), and a negative predictive value of 95%/97% (126/132, 127/131), using a 50%-99% threshold of diameter stenosis. For detection of complete occlusion, according to observers 1 and 2, respectively, 3D TOF-MRA at 3T had a sensitivity of 100% (13/13), a specificity of 99% (145/147), a positive predictive value of 87% (13/15), and a negative predictive value of 100% (145/145). Interobserver agreement of 3D TOF-MRA was excellent (kappa = 0.81). CONCLUSION High-resolution 3D TOF-MRA with sensitivity encoding at 3T can be used as a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of clinically significant steno-occlusive disease of major intracranial arteries.

[1]  S. Riederer,et al.  Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  M. Takahashi,et al.  Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  D Saloner,et al.  Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  W. Steinbrich,et al.  Intracranial arteries: prospective blinded comparative study of MR angiography and DSA in 50 patients. , 1995, Radiology.

[6]  S. Kwon,et al.  Cilostazol Prevents the Progression of the Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: The Multicenter Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Cilostazol in Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis , 2005 .

[7]  G. Schuierer,et al.  Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and 3D phase-contrast MR angiography , 1998, Neuroradiology.

[8]  A. Wilman,et al.  Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  H. Lanfermann,et al.  Comparison of intracranial 3D‐ToF‐MRA with and without parallel acquisition techniques at 1.5t and 3.0t: preliminary results , 2004, Acta radiologica.

[10]  J Huston,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla: initial clinical experience. , 2001, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[11]  R. Sacco,et al.  Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. , 1995, Stroke.

[12]  Horst Urbach,et al.  Time-of-flight MR angiography: comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging--initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[13]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  J E Heiserman,et al.  Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: evaluation with three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. , 1992, Radiology.

[15]  H. Steinmetz,et al.  Intracranial stenoocclusive disease: MR angiography with magnetization transfer and variable flip angle. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  S. Kwon,et al.  Cilostazol Prevents the Progression of the Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis: The Multicenter Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Cilostazol in Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis , 2005, Stroke.

[17]  Cristina Lavini,et al.  MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  G. Duckwiler,et al.  Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[19]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[20]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[21]  T. Neumann-Haefelin,et al.  Reliability and validity of noninvasive imaging of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion. , 1999, Stroke.

[22]  D. Hadizadeh,et al.  Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0 T. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[23]  Soo Mee Lim,et al.  Pattern of atherosclerotic carotid stenosis in Korean patients with stroke: different involvement of intracranial versus extracranial vessels. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[24]  P. Yip,et al.  Evaluation of intracranial and extracranial carotid steno-occlusive diseases in Taiwan Chinese patients with MR angiography: preliminary experience. , 1996, Stroke.

[25]  M. Takahashi,et al.  Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional, Fourier transform, time-of-flight MR angiography. , 1994, Radiology.

[26]  W. Mali,et al.  Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography. , 2000, Radiology.