Effect of alternative crosslinking methods on the low strain rate viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardial bioprosthetic material.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Barker,et al. A study of the effects of glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde on the mechanical behaviour of bovine pericardium. , 1982, Biomaterials.
[2] H. Koyanagi,et al. Epoxy Compounds As a New Cross‐Linking Agent for Porcine Aortic Leaflets: Subcutaneous Implant Studies in Rats , 1989, Journal of cardiac surgery.
[3] F. Nistal,et al. Degenerative pathologic findings after long-term implantation of bovine pericardial bioprosthetic heart valves. , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[4] E. Trowbridge,et al. Evidence that deformations which occur during mechanical conditioning of bovine pericardium are not permanent. , 1986, Biomaterials.
[5] M. Ionescu,et al. Clinical durability of the pericardial xenograft valve: ten years experience with mitral replacement. , 1982, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[6] D R Boughner,et al. Tissue Mechanics of Canine Pericardium in Different Test Environments: Evidence for Time‐Dependent Accommodation, Absence of Plasticity, and New Roles for Collagen and Elastin , 1981, Circulation research.
[7] D R Boughner,et al. The glutaraldehyde-stabilized porcine aortic valve xenograft. II. Effect of fixation with or without pressure on the tensile viscoelastic properties of the leaflet material. , 1984, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.
[8] J M Lee,et al. The bovine pericardial xenograft: II. Effect of tethering or pressurization during fixation on the tensile viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardium. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[9] Lee Jm,et al. The bovine pericardial xenograft: I. Effect of fixation in aldehydes without constraint on the tensile viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardium , 1989 .
[10] F. Silver,et al. Evaluation of collagen crosslinking techniques. , 1983, Biomaterials, medical devices, and artificial organs.
[11] J. M. Lee. Tensile Viscoelastic Properties Of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Materials And Of The Pericardium , 1982 .
[12] F. Loop,et al. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves. , 1985, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[13] L Gonzalez-Lavin,et al. Causes of failure and pathologic findings in surgically removed Ionescu-Shiley standard bovine pericardial heart valve bioprostheses: emphasis on progressive structural deterioration. , 1987, Circulation.
[14] L. Cohn,et al. Hemodynamic and pathologic evaluation of a unileaflet pericardial bioprosthetic valve. , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
[15] G L Hallman,et al. Valve failure with the Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprosthesis: analysis of 2680 patients. , 1985, Journal of vascular surgery.
[16] D R Boughner,et al. Mechanical suitability of glycerol-preserved human dura mater for construction of prosthetic cardiac valves. , 1984, Biomaterials.
[17] I Vesely,et al. A multipurpose tissue bending machine. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.
[18] R. Levy,et al. The role of glutaraldehyde-induced cross-links in calcification of bovine pericardium used in cardiac valve bioprostheses. , 1987, The American journal of pathology.