Radiomics Analysis on FLT-PET/MRI for Characterization of Early Treatment Response in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Proof-of-Concept Study1

Studying early response to cancer treatment is significant for patient treatment stratification and follow-up. Although recent advances in positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allow for evaluation of tumor response, a quantitative objective assessment of treatment-related effects offers localization and quantification of structural and functional changes in the tumor region. Radiomics, the process of computerized extraction of features from radiographic images, is a new strategy for capturing subtle changes in the tumor region that works by quantifying subvisual patterns which might escape human identification. The goal of this study was to demonstrate feasibility for performing radiomics analysis on integrated PET/MRI to characterize early treatment response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergoing sunitinib therapy. Two patients with advanced RCC were imaged using an integrated PET/MRI scanner. [18 F] fluorothymidine (FLT) was used as the PET radiotracer, which can measure the degree of cell proliferation. Image acquisitions included test/retest scans before sunitinib treatment and one scan 3 weeks into treatment using [18 F] FLT-PET, T2-weighted (T2w), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocols, where DWI yielded an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. Our framework to quantitatively characterize treatment-related changes involved the following analytic steps: 1) intraacquisition and interacquisition registration of protocols to allow voxel-wise comparison of changes in radiomic features, 2) correction and pseudoquantification of T2w images to remove acquisition artifacts and examine tissue-specific response, 3) characterization of information captured by T2w MRI, FLT-PET, and ADC via radiomics, and 4) combining multiparametric information to create a map of integrated changes from PET/MRI radiomic features. Standardized uptake value (from FLT-PET) and ADC textures ranked highest for reproducibility in a test/retest evaluation as well as for capturing treatment response, in comparison to high variability seen in T2w MRI. The highest-ranked radiomic feature yielded a normalized percentage change of 63% within the RCC region and 17% in a spatially distinct normal region relative to its pretreatment value. By comparison, both the original and postprocessed T2w signal intensity appeared to be markedly less sensitive and specific to changes within the tumor. Our preliminary results thus suggest that radiomics analysis could be a powerful tool for characterizing treatment response in integrated PET/MRI.

[1]  Apurva A Desai,et al.  Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Somphob Soongsathitanon,et al.  A novel standardized uptake value (SUV) calculation of PET DICOM files using MATLAB , 2010 .

[3]  M S Cohen,et al.  Rapid and effective correction of RF inhomogeneity for high field magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  Multiple Nuclei Tracking Using Integer Programming for Quantitative Cancer Cell Cycle Analysis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  L. Chow,et al.  Sunitinib: from rational design to clinical efficacy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  T. Kailath The Divergence and Bhattacharyya Distance Measures in Signal Selection , 1967 .

[7]  J. Vercher-Conejero,et al.  Clinical oncologic applications of PET/MRI: a new horizon. , 2014, American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.

[8]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Computer extracted texture features on T2w MRI to predict biochemical recurrence following radiation therapy for prostate cancer , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[9]  Patrick Granton,et al.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[10]  R. Lenkinski,et al.  Central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors have significantly different quantitative imaging signatures on 3 tesla endorectal, in vivo T2‐weighted MR imagery , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  F. Brooks,et al.  The Effect of Small Tumor Volumes on Studies of Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Tracer Uptake , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[13]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Quantitative identification of magnetic resonance imaging features of prostate cancer response following laser ablation and radical prostatectomy , 2014, Journal of medical imaging.

[14]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[15]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Jae-Hun Kim,et al.  Imaging-Based Tumor Treatment Response Evaluation: Review of Conventional, New, and Emerging Concepts , 2012, Korean journal of radiology.

[17]  M. Hatt,et al.  18F-FDG PET Uptake Characterization Through Texture Analysis: Investigating the Complementary Nature of Heterogeneity and Functional Tumor Volume in a Multi–Cancer Site Patient Cohort , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Textural Kinetics: A Novel Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Feature for Breast Lesion Classification , 2011, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[19]  N. Tamaki,et al.  Increased intratumoral fluorothymidine uptake levels following multikinase inhibitor sorafenib treatment in a human renal cell carcinoma xenograft model , 2013, Oncology letters.

[20]  B. Condon,et al.  Image non-uniformity in magnetic resonance imaging: its magnitude and methods for its correction. , 1987, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  R. Figlin,et al.  Activity of SU11248, a multitargeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Marvin Bergsneider,et al.  Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  New variants of a method of MRI scale standardization , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Jan Flusser,et al.  Image registration methods: a survey , 2003, Image Vis. Comput..

[26]  K. Flaherty,et al.  MRI assessment of early tumor response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  E. Raymond,et al.  Safety, pharmacokinetic, and antitumor activity of SU11248, a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Interplay between bias field correction, intensity standardization, and noise filtering for T2-weighted MRI , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Identifying quantitative in vivo multi-parametric MRI features for treatment related changes after laser interstitial thermal therapy of prostate cancer , 2014, Neurocomputing.

[30]  G. Rosner,et al.  Phase II placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation trial of sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  A. Villers,et al.  Prostate cancer characterization on MR images using fractal features. , 2010, Medical physics.

[32]  P. Choyke,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[33]  Lei Tang,et al.  Locally advanced rectal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy: preliminary analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for early detection of tumor histopathologic downstaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[34]  YingJian Zhang,et al.  Early Monitoring Antiangiogenesis Treatment Response of Sunitinib in U87MG Tumor Xenograft by 18F-FLT MicroPET/CT Imaging , 2014, BioMed research international.

[35]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A Review of Methods for Correction of Intensity Inhomogeneity in MRI , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  R. Figlin,et al.  Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  Felix G. Meinel,et al.  Texture Analysis as Imaging Biomarker of Tumoral Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients Studied with 3-T Magnetic Resonance , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[38]  N. Avril,et al.  Early response monitoring of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma using [F-18]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance. , 2014, Seminars in roentgenology.

[39]  Irène Buvat,et al.  Tumor Texture Analysis in 18F-FDG PET: Relationships Between Texture Parameters, Histogram Indices, Standardized Uptake Values, Metabolic Volumes, and Total Lesion Glycolysis , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.