Anticipatory distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search

Salient yet irrelevant objects often capture our attention and interfere with our daily tasks. Distraction by salient objects can be reduced by suppressing the location where they are likely to appear. The question we addressed here was whether suppression of frequent distractor locations is already implemented beforehand, in anticipation of the stimulus. Using EEG, we recorded cortical activity of human participants searching for a target while ignoring a salient distractor. The distractor was presented more often at one location than at any other location. We found reduced capture for distractors at frequent locations, indicating that participants learned to avoid distraction. Critically, we found evidence for “proactive suppression” as already “prior to display onset,” there was enhanced power in parieto-occipital alpha oscillations contralateral to the frequent distractor location—a signal known to occur in anticipation of irrelevant information. Locked to display onset, ERP analysis showed a distractor suppression-related distractor positivity (PD) component for this location. Importantly, this PD was found regardless of whether distracting information was presented at the frequent location. In addition, there was an early PD component representing an early attentional index of the frequent distractor location. Our results show anticipatory (proactive) suppression of frequent distractor locations in visual search already starting prior to display onset.

[1]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual Attention , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[3]  C. Olivers,et al.  Posterior α EEG Dynamics Dissociate Current from Future Goals in Working Memory-Guided Visual Search , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[5]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional , 2018, Journal of cognition.

[6]  Leonardo Chelazzi,et al.  Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering , 2017, Cortex.

[7]  Jürgen Kayser,et al.  Issues and considerations for using the scalp surface Laplacian in EEG/ERP research: A tutorial review. , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[8]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Anticipatory Biasing of Visuospatial Attention Indexed by Retinotopically Specific α-Bank Electroencephalography Increases over Occipital Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  W. Klimesch Memory processes, brain oscillations and EEG synchronization. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[11]  Edward K Vogel,et al.  Neural Evidence for the Contribution of Active Suppression During Working Memory Filtering , 2019, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Active suppression after involuntary capture of attention , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[13]  O. Jensen,et al.  Shaping Functional Architecture by Oscillatory Alpha Activity: Gating by Inhibition , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Evidence for Second-Order Singleton Suppression Based on Probabilistic Expectations , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Prefrontal Control of Visual Distraction , 2017, Current Biology.

[16]  Anna Schubö,et al.  You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[17]  S J Luck,et al.  Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[19]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[20]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  W. Klimesch EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , 1999, Brain Research Reviews.

[22]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[23]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[24]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[25]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Measurement of ERP latency differences: a comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[26]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Increases in alpha oscillatory power reflect an active retinotopic mechanism for distracter suppression during sustained visuospatial attention. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Identifying reliable independent components via split-half comparisons , 2009, NeuroImage.

[29]  Agnieszka Wykowska,et al.  Context heterogeneity has a sustained impact on attention deployment: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[30]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Goal-driven, stimulus-driven, and history-driven selection. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.

[33]  J. Theeuwes Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Clayton Hickey,et al.  A temporal dependency account of attentional inhibition in oculomotor control , 2017, NeuroImage.

[35]  John M. Gaspar,et al.  Suppression of Salient Objects Prevents Distraction in Visual Search , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  Roberto Dell'Acqua,et al.  Contralateral cortical organisation of information in visual short-term memory: Evidence from lateralized brain activity during retrieval , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[38]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Electrophysiological Indices of Target and Distractor Processing in Visual Search , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[40]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  M. Chun,et al.  Selective attention modulates implicit learning , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[42]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional; A Reply to Commentaries , 2018, Journal of cognition.

[43]  Heleen A. Slagter,et al.  Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms , 2019, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[45]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[47]  David J. Prime,et al.  Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[49]  Heleen A. Slagter,et al.  Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms , 2019, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Eren Gunseli,et al.  Local and interregional alpha EEG dynamics dissociate between memory for search and memory for recognition , 2017, NeuroImage.

[51]  W. Klimesch Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Katherine M. Armstrong,et al.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex , 2003, Nature.

[53]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Ali Jannati,et al.  Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[56]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[57]  W. Ziegler The Oxford Handbook Of Event Related Potential Components , 2016 .

[58]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  ERP Components and Selective Attention , 2011 .

[59]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  Combined Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence for the Suppression of Salient Distractors , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  The distractor positivity (Pd) signals lowering of attentional priority: evidence from event-related potentials and individual differences. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[61]  Howard E Egeth,et al.  The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.