A randomized phase II study of combination, alternating and sequential regimens of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND This randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of doxorubicin and docetaxel (DOC) administered either as a combination, an alternating or a sequential regimen in women with metastatic breast cancer. Secondary objectives included overall response, time to progression, survival and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with breast cancer (n=123) were randomized to receive doxorubicin and DOC either in combination (60 mg/m2 of each drug), or by alternated or sequential schedule (100 mg/m2 DOC and 75 mg/m2 doxorubicin) every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles as first chemotherapy for stage IV disease. A second randomization allocated patients from each arm to receive prophylactic oral ciprofloxacin or no therapy to prevent febrile neutropenia. RESULTS Patients received a median of eight cycles. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response was 63%, 52% and 61% in the combination, alternating and sequential schedules, respectively. Corresponding rates of complete response were 15%, 14% and 11%. Grade 4 neutropenia was common in all arms (81%) and, together with febrile neutropenia, was significantly more frequent with the combination. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin did not reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia or infection. Other frequent non-hematological adverse events included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis and asthenia. Congestive heart failure only occurred in the combination arm (10%). CONCLUSION All three schedules are feasible and endowed of good therapeutic activity. In view of the more pronounced toxicity and the risk of cardiac events because of the higher exposure to doxorubicin, the combination should be least favored when treating women with metastatic breast cancer. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin was ineffective and is not recommended.

[1]  M. Krzakowski,et al.  Docetaxel and doxorubicin compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  R. Paridaens,et al.  A randomized phase II study of alternating and sequential regimens of docetaxel and doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[3]  G. Minotti,et al.  Paclitaxel and docetaxel enhance the metabolism of doxorubicin to toxic species in human myocardium. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[4]  J. Mackey,et al.  Phase II study of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Y. Ohashi,et al.  Study of dose escalation and sequence switching of administration of the combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin in advanced breast cancer. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[6]  J. Sparano,et al.  Phase II trial of doxorubicin and docetaxel plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in metastatic breast cancer: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1196. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  A. Wolff,et al.  Phase II trial of doxorubicin and paclitaxel plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in metastatic breast cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  W. McCaskill-Stevens,et al.  Combination versus sequential doxorubicin and docetaxel as primary chemotherapy for breast cancer: A randomized pilot trial of the Hoosier Oncology Group. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  K. Friedrichs,et al.  Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  S. Arbuck,et al.  #420 Common toxicity criteria (ctc) version 2.0: highlights and tools , 1999 .

[11]  W. Eiermann,et al.  Maximized reduction of primary breast tumor size using preoperative chemotherapy with doxorubicin and docetaxel. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  V. Diéras,et al.  Dose-finding study of docetaxel and doxorubicin in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  M D'Incalci,et al.  Pharmacokinetic interactions of paclitaxel, docetaxel and their vehicles with doxorubicin. , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  M. Zucchetti,et al.  Taxoids in combination with anthracyclines and other agents: pharmacokinetic considerations. , 1998, Seminars in oncology.

[15]  P. Singal,et al.  Doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  J. Mackey,et al.  Docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. , 1997, Oncology.

[17]  P. Fumoleau,et al.  A multicentre phase II study of the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer: report of the Clinical Screening Group of the EORTC. , 1996, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  P M Ravdin,et al.  Phase II trial of docetaxel in advanced anthracycline-resistant or anthracenedione-resistant breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  A. Caraceni,et al.  Paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion in combination with bolus doxorubicin in women with untreated metastatic breast cancer: high antitumor efficacy and cardiac effects in a dose-finding and sequence-finding study. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Sequential or alternating doxorubicin and CMF regimens in breast cancer with more than three positive nodes. Ten-year results. , 1995, JAMA.

[21]  D. Lacombe,et al.  Phase II trial of vinorelbine/doxorubicin as first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  R. Demicheli,et al.  Drugs ten years later: epirubicin. , 1993, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[23]  H. Niitani,et al.  [Antimicrotubule agents]. , 1993, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[24]  I. Henderson,et al.  Randomized clinical trial comparing mitoxantrone with doxorubicin in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  Goldie Jh,et al.  Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy. , 1982 .

[26]  M. Palmer,et al.  WHO Handbook for Reporting Results of Cancer Treatment , 1982, British Journal of Cancer.

[27]  V. Devita,et al.  Cancer : Principles and Practice of Oncology , 1982 .

[28]  J H Goldie,et al.  Rationale for the use of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy. , 1982, Cancer treatment reports.

[29]  L. Norton,et al.  Tumor size, sensitivity to therapy, and design of treatment schedules. , 1977, Cancer treatment reports.