Market Power Mitigation Clearing Mechanism Based on Constrained Bidding Capacities

Market power has been a problematic issue for fair and transparent trades in various electricity markets. To deal with the problems of existing market power mitigation methods, such as complicated judgment criteria, excessive supervision probability, impersonal cost data accounting, and the requirements on perfect information circumstances, a novel spot market power mitigation clearing mechanism (MPMCM) is proposed, which manages to limit potential market power execution while avoiding overregulation and maintaining a real market supply–demand situation. The MPMCM consists of three processes, namely, market power evaluation, bidding capacity division, and bidding capacity constraint. The MPMCM is transformed into a set of bidding constraints and properly integrated in the common market clearing procedure. A bilevel mathematical problem with equilibrium constraints market equilibrium model is proposed to formulate the MPMCM for market simulation, and the mixed integer linear problem reformulation of the bilevel model is derived. Finally, an illustrative example is proposed to observe the strategic behaviors under various situations, thereby proving the validity and effectiveness of the MPMCM. A large-scale numerical example based on a modified IEEE 200-node system is proposed to prove the adaptivity of the MPMCM.

[1]  Andrew Sweeting,et al.  Market Power in the England and Wales Wholesale Electricity Market 1995-2000 , 2004 .

[2]  Qixin Chen,et al.  Electricity markets evolution with the changing generation mix: An empirical analysis based on China 2050 High Renewable Energy Penetration Roadmap ☆ , 2017 .

[3]  Frank A. Wolak,et al.  Market Power in a Hydro-Dominated Wholesale Electricity Market , 2017 .

[4]  Thomas J. Overbye,et al.  Grid Structural Characteristics as Validation Criteria for Synthetic Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  S. Borenstein,et al.  The Competitive Effects of Transmission Capacity in a Deregulated Electricity Industry , 1997 .

[6]  Morteza Rahimiyan,et al.  Capacity Withholding Constrained by Operational Limits of Generation Under Financial Virtual Divestiture in a Day-Ahead Market , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  S. Bose,et al.  A Unifying Market Power Measure for Deregulated Transmission-Constrained Electricity Markets , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Mohammad Reza Hesamzadeh,et al.  Exercise of Market Power on Ramp Rate in Wind-Integrated Power Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Jong-Keun Park,et al.  The incentive announcement effect of demand response on market power mitigation in the electricity market , 2017 .

[10]  Richard Green,et al.  A Review of the Monitoring of Market Power The Possible Roles of TSOs in Monitoring for Market Power Issues in Congested Transmission Systems , 2005 .

[11]  S. Borenstein,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Potential for Market Power in California&Apos;S Electricity Industry , 1998 .

[12]  Nasser Hosseinzadeh,et al.  The TC-PSI indicator for forecasting the potential for market power in wholesale electricity markets , 2011 .

[13]  E. Dehdashti,et al.  Monitoring and surveillance of wholesale electricity markets: roles, responsibilities and challenges , 2005, IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2005.

[14]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  Market equilibrium analysis with high penetration of renewables and gas-fired generation: An empirical case of the Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan power system , 2017, Applied Energy.

[15]  Asghar Akbari Foroud,et al.  Behavioural market power indices in a transmission-constrained electricity market , 2017 .

[16]  Jin Hur,et al.  Firm-Based Measurements of Market Power in Transmission-Constrained Electricity Markets , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  S. Borenstein,et al.  Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market , 2002 .

[18]  Chi-Keung Woo,et al.  Electricity market reform failures: UK, Norway, Alberta and California , 2003 .

[19]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets , 2012 .

[20]  Habib Rajabi Mashhadi,et al.  Measurement of Power Supplier's Market Power Using a Proposed Fuzzy Estimator , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Pool equilibria including strategic storage , 2016 .

[22]  Eilyan Bitar,et al.  A Structural Characterization of Market Power in Electric Power Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering.

[23]  S. Stoft Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity , 2002 .

[24]  Qixin Chen,et al.  A Market-Power-Controlled Spot Market Clearing Mechanism Based on Residual Supply Index , 2018, 2018 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[25]  D. Bunn,et al.  Divestiture of Generation Assets in the Electricity Pool of England and Wales: A Computational Approach to Analyzing Market Power , 2001 .

[26]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  1 Report on the Appropriateness of the Three Pivotal Supplier Test and Alternative Competitive Screens , 2013 .

[27]  A. J. Conejo,et al.  Equilibria in an Oligopolistic Electricity Pool With Stepwise Offer Curves , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[28]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Investigating the Ability of Demand Shifting to Mitigate Electricity Producers’ Market Power , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[29]  Andrej F. Gubina,et al.  The review of market power detection tools in organised electricity markets , 2017, 2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM).

[30]  Mohammad Kazem Sheikh-El-Eslami,et al.  Ex-ante evaluation and optimal mitigation of market power in electricity markets including renewable energy resources , 2016 .

[31]  Youngho Chang The New Electricity Market of Singapore: Regulatory framework, market power and competition , 2007 .