Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis.

Few issues in swine production are as complex as floor space allowances. One method for pork producers to calculate floor space allowance (A) is to convert BW into a 2-dimensional concept yielding an expression of A = k * BW(0.667). Data on ADG, ADFI, and G:F were obtained from published peer-reviewed studies. Five data sets were created: A = grower-finisher pigs, fully slatted floors, and consistent group size; B = grower-finisher pigs and fully slatted floors (group size did not need to be consistent); C = grower-finisher pigs, partially slatted floors, and consistent group size; D = grower-finisher pigs, partially slatted floors (group size did not need to be consistent); and E = nursery pigs, fully slatted or woven wire floors (group size did not need to be consistent). Each data set was analyzed using a broken-line analysis and a linear regression. For the broken-line analyses, the critical k value, below which a decrease in ADG occurred, varied from 0.0317 to 0.0348. In all cases the effect of space allowance on ADG was significant (P < 0.05). Using the linear analyses based on data with k values of < 0.030, the critical k values for the 4 grower-finisher data sets did not differ from those obtained using the broken-line analysis (0.0358 vs. 0.0336, respectively; P > 0.10); however, none of the linear regressions explained a significant proportion of the variation in ADG. The slopes for the nonplateau portion of the broken-line analyses based on percent values varied among data sets. For every 0.001 decrease in k (approximately 3% of the critical k value), ADG decreased by 0.56 to 1.41%, with an average value of 0.98% for the 5%-based analyses. The use of an allometric approach to express space allowance and broken-line analysis to establish space requirements seem to be useful tools for pig production. The critical k value at which crowding becomes detrimental to the growth of the pig is similar in full- and partial-slat systems and in nursery and grower-finisher stages. The critical point for crowding determined in these analyses approximated current recommendations to ensure the welfare of pigs.

[1]  L. Johnston,et al.  Interaction of swine nursery and grow-finish space allocations on performance. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[2]  S. Edwards,et al.  Legislative methods for specifying stocking density and consequences for the welfare of finishing pigs. , 2000 .

[3]  A. H. Jensen,et al.  Response of Growing-Finishing Male and Female Swine to Floor Space Allowance on Partially and Totally Slotted Floors , 1973 .

[4]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Response of growing-finishing pigs to decreasing floor space allowance and(or) virginiamycin in diet. , 1985, Journal of Animal Science.

[5]  A. Rudine,et al.  The physical size of gestating sows. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[6]  M. Brumm,et al.  Response of pigs to space allocation and diets varying in nutrient density. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[7]  E. Kornegay,et al.  The effects of restricted floor space allowance and virginiamycin supplementation on the feedlot performance of swine , 1983 .

[8]  A. H. Jensen,et al.  Effects of Floor Space Allowance and Number per Group on Performance of Growing-Finishing Swine , 1966 .

[9]  M. Brumm,et al.  ECONOMICS OF SPACE ALLOCATION FOR GROWER-FINISHER HOGS: A SIMULATION APPROACH , 1993 .

[10]  L. Southern,et al.  Effects of betaine, pen space, and slaughter handling method on growth performance, carcass traits, and pork quality of finishing barrows. , 2001, Journal of animal science.

[11]  V. E. Beattie,et al.  The effect of stocking density and social regrouping stressors on growth performance, carcass characteristics, nutrient digestibility and physiological stress responses in pigs , 2004 .

[12]  H. H. Spechter,et al.  Effects of floor area allowance on performance of growing pigs kept on fully slatted floors , 1988 .

[13]  J. Hurnik,et al.  Use of body surface area to set minimum space allowances for confined pigs and cattle , 1991 .

[14]  John J. McGlone,et al.  Space requirements for finishing pigs in confinement: behavior and performance while group size and space vary , 1994 .

[15]  M. Ellis,et al.  Feed intake pattern of group-housed growing-finishing pigs monitored using a computerized feed intake recording system. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[16]  W R Stricklin,et al.  Effects of floor area allowance and group size on the productivity of growing/finishing pigs. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[17]  L. Southern,et al.  Interactive effects of dietary chromium tripicolinate and crude protein level in growing-finishing pigs provided inadequate and adequate pen space. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[18]  J. Petherick,et al.  A note on allometric relationships in large white × landrace pigs , 1983 .

[19]  S. Curtis,et al.  Group size and floor-space allowance can affect weanling-pig performance. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[20]  R. Thaler,et al.  Response of barrows to space allocation and ractopamine. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[21]  C. Boon The effect of departures from lower critical temperature on the group postural behaviour of pigs , 1981 .

[22]  Kelly R. Robbins,et al.  A Method, SAS Program, and Example for Fitting the Broken-Line to Growth Data , 1986 .