Uncertainty quantification of computational coronary stenosis assessment and model based mitigation of image resolution limitations

Abstract Coronary artery disease is one of the leading causes of death globally. The hallmark of this disease is the occurrence of stenosed coronary arteries which reduce blood flow to the myocardium. Severely stenosed arteries can be treated if detected, but the diagnostic procedure to assess fractional flow reserve (FFR), a quantitative measure of stenosis severity, is invasive, burdensome to the patient, and costly. Recent computational approaches estimate the severity of stenoses from simulations of coronary blood flow based on CT imagery. These methods allow for diagnosis to be made noninvasively and using fewer hospital resources; however, the predictions depend on uncertain input data and model parameters due to technical limitations and patient variability. To assess the consequences of boundary condition and input uncertainty on predictions of FFR, we developed a model of coronary blood flow. We performed uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of the predictions based on uncertainties in boundary conditions, parameters, and geometric measurements. Our results identified three influential sources of uncertainty: geometric data, cardiac output, and coronary resistance during hyperemia. Further, uncertainty about the geometry of the stenosed coronary branch influences estimates much more than other geometrical data. Limitations of medical imaging contribute uncertainty to predictions as vessels below a certain threshold remain unobserved. We assessed the effects of unobserved vessels by comparing predictions based on both high and low resolution data. Moreover, we introduced a novel method that estimates flow distribution while accounting for unobserved vessels. This method improved FFR predictions in the cases considered by 50% on average.

[1]  S. Kuribayashi,et al.  Cost analysis of non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomographic angiography in Japan , 2014, Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.

[2]  Christopher K. Zarins,et al.  Computed Fractional Flow Reserve (FFTCT) Derived from Coronary CT Angiography , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research.

[3]  K. Hirohata,et al.  A novel CT-FFR method for the coronary artery based on 4D-CT image analysis and structural and fluid analysis , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[4]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography in stable coronary disease: a new standard in non-invasive testing? , 2015, European Radiology.

[5]  N. Pijls,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve , 1995 .

[6]  Stephan Achenbach,et al.  Computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  P. Parizel,et al.  Effects of sublingual nitroglycerin on coronary lumen diameter and number of visualized septal branches on 64-MDCT angiography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[9]  N. Suwa,et al.  Estimation of intravascular blood pressure gradient by mathematical analysis of arterial casts. , 1963, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  Patricia V Lawford,et al.  Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: modeling the significance of coronary lesions: results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) study. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[11]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[12]  R. Blankstein,et al.  Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease by Positron Emission Tomography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Computed Tomography , 2014, Current Cardiology Reports.

[13]  Thomas V. Wiecki,et al.  Probabilistic Programming in Python using PyMC , 2015, 1507.08050.

[14]  Vinzenz Gregor Eck,et al.  A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications , 2016, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[15]  Frédéric Precioso,et al.  Standardized evaluation framework for evaluating coronary artery stenosis detection, stenosis quantification and lumen segmentation algorithms in computed tomography angiography , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  H. Fukasawa Hemodynamical studies of cerebral arteries by means of mathematical analysis of arterial casts. , 1969, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[17]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  Numerical strategy for model correction using physical constraints , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[18]  M. Chakravarthy Cardiac output--have we found the 'gold standard'? , 2008, Annals of cardiac anaesthesia.

[19]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Cardiac CT: how much can temporal resolution, spatial resolution, and volume coverage be improved? , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[20]  G Rogers,et al.  A Comparison of the Indirect Estimate of Mean Arterial Pressure Calculated by the Conventional Equation and Calculated to Compensate for a Change in Heart Rate , 2000, International journal of sports medicine.

[21]  A. Lerner,et al.  Cardiac Output Monitoring: Is There a Gold Standard and How Do the Newer Technologies Compare? , 2010, Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[22]  Sascha Meyer,et al.  Review article: Non‐invasive assessment of cardiac output with portable continuous‐wave Doppler ultrasound , 2008, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[23]  William Wijns,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Angioplasty in Moderate Coronary Stenosis: A Randomized Trial , 2001, Circulation.

[24]  Nathan D. Wong,et al.  Epidemiological studies of CHD and the evolution of preventive cardiology , 2014, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[25]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[26]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Tim A. Fonte,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamics Applied to Cardiac Computed Tomography for Noninvasive Quantification of Fractional Flow Reserve , 2022 .

[28]  C A Bulant,et al.  A head-to-head comparison between CT- and IVUS-derived coronary blood flow models. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[30]  Nikola Jagic,et al.  Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Suwei Wang,et al.  Current use of fractional flow reserve: a nationwide survey. , 2014, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[32]  Jin-Ho Choi,et al.  Physiological Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis Depends on the Amount of Myocardial Mass Subtended by the Coronary Artery. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[33]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  A framework for personalization of coronary flow computations during rest and hyperemia , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[34]  C Cherniak,et al.  Modeling the large-scale geometry of human coronary arteries. , 2000, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[35]  P. V. van Heerden,et al.  Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. , 2005, British journal of anaesthesia.

[36]  François Rousset,et al.  Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling Extension of Murray's Law Using a Non-newtonian Model of Blood Flow , 2022 .

[37]  T. Kenner,et al.  The measurement of blood density and its meaning , 1989, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[38]  T. Cuisset,et al.  Fractional flow reserve--the influence of the collateral circulation. , 2009, International journal of cardiology.

[39]  C. D. Murray THE PHYSIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE OF MINIMUM WORK , 1931, The Journal of general physiology.

[40]  M. Roizen Forecasting the Future of Cardiovascular Disease in the United States: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association , 2012 .

[41]  Ghassan S. Kassab,et al.  A validated predictive model of coronary fractional flow reserve , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[42]  Ratna Babu Chinnam,et al.  Metamodels for variable importance decomposition with applications to probabilistic engineering design , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[43]  P. Yock,et al.  Measurement of volumetric coronary blood flow by simultaneous intravascular two-dimensional and Doppler ultrasound: validation in an animal model. , 1994, American heart journal.

[44]  Hans Petter Langtangen,et al.  Chaospy: An open source tool for designing methods of uncertainty quantification , 2015, J. Comput. Sci..

[45]  Y. Mehta,et al.  Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2006, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[46]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[47]  R. Caflisch Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods , 1998, Acta Numerica.

[48]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve Estimated at Coronary CT Angiography in Intermediate Lesions: Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Methods to Determine Coronary Flow Distribution. , 2017, Radiology.

[49]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Comparison of quantitative stenosis characteristics at routine coronary computed tomography angiography with invasive fractional flow reserve for assessing lesion-specific ischemia. , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[50]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices , 2002 .

[51]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[52]  Bernard J. Gersh,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2010 .

[53]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Vessel Caliber and Branch‐Angle of Human Coronary Artery Branch‐Points , 1976, Circulation research.

[54]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  AHA Statistical Update Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics — 2012 Update A Report From the American Heart Association WRITING GROUP MEMBERS , 2010 .

[55]  W. Wijns,et al.  Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. , 1996, Circulation.

[56]  N. Kostomitsopoulos,et al.  A comparative anatomic and physiologic overview of the porcine heart. , 2014, Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS.

[57]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in coronary blood flow simulations: Impact of geometry, boundary conditions and blood viscosity. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[58]  Stavros G Drakos,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography for the detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a meta-analysis of prospective trials. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[59]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Lumen boundaries extracted from coronary computed tomography angiography on computed fractional flow reserve (FFRCT): validation with optical coherence tomography. , 2019, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[60]  S N Hunyor,et al.  Comparison of performance of various sphygmomanometers with intra-arterial blood-pressure readings. , 1978, British medical journal.

[61]  G S Kassab,et al.  Morphometry of pig coronary arterial trees. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[62]  J. Leipsic,et al.  SCCT guidelines for the performance and acquisition of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee: Endorsed by the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[63]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.