GreekLex: A lexical database of Modern Greek
暂无分享,去创建一个
Nicola J. Pitchford | Maria Ktori | Walter J. B. Heuven | N. Pitchford | W. V. Heuven | Maria Ktori | Maria Ktori
[1] S. Andrews. The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .
[2] M. S. Mayzner,et al. Tables of single-letter and digram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations. , 1965 .
[3] Sally Andrews,et al. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .
[4] Robert Schreuder,et al. How Complex Simplex Words can be , 1997 .
[5] Robert L. Solso,et al. Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two- through nine-letter English words , 1980 .
[6] A. Pollatsek,et al. The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[7] H. Kucera,et al. Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .
[8] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition , 1984 .
[9] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .
[10] J. Grainger,et al. An Electrophysiological Study of the Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size on Printed Word Perception , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[11] Manuel Perea,et al. The effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification tasks: A review , 2000 .
[12] J. Grainger,et al. Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[13] P. Mousty,et al. Brulex: une base de donne 'es lexicales informatise 'e pour le franc?ais e 'crit et parle , 1990 .
[14] Michael J Cortese,et al. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[15] S. M. Chambers. Letter and order information in lexical access , 1979 .
[16] S. Andrews. Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability , 1996 .
[17] J Grainger,et al. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.
[18] Prisca Stenneken,et al. Sublexical frequency measures for orthographic and phonological units in German , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[19] S. Lupker,et al. Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .
[20] Marc Brysbaert,et al. WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[21] M. Taft,et al. Lack of Phonological Mediation in a Semantic Categorization Task , 1998 .
[22] Laurie Beth Feldman,et al. Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: evidence from English and Hebrew. , 1995 .
[23] Max Coltheart,et al. The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .
[24] George Carayannis,et al. Basic Quantitative Characteristics of the Modern Greek Language Using the Hellenic National Corpus , 2005, J. Quant. Linguistics.
[25] Manuel Carreiras,et al. E-Hitz: A word frequency list and a program for deriving psycholinguistic statistics in an agglutinative language (Basque) , 2006, Behavior research methods.
[26] F. Pulvermüller,et al. Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[27] Manuel Perea,et al. Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency , 2008 .
[28] Manuel Perea,et al. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. , 2008, British journal of psychology.
[29] J. Bowers,et al. Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a hat in that? , 2005 .
[30] C. Davis,et al. More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[31] David A. Balota,et al. Visual Word Recognition: The Journey from Features to Meaning (A Travel Update) , 2006 .
[32] Kenneth I. Forster,et al. No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[33] M. Brysbaert,et al. Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths , 2000, Psychological research.
[34] Robert D Vincent,et al. Anagram software for cognitive research that enables specification of psycholinguistic variables , 2006, Behavior research methods.
[35] C. Davis. N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics , 2005, Behavior research methods.
[36] C. Davis,et al. BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish , 2005, Behavior research methods.
[37] K. Rastle,et al. The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English , 2004 .
[38] Max Coltheart,et al. Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .
[39] Manuel Perea,et al. Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .
[40] S. Andrews. Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .
[41] Cristina Burani,et al. Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[42] George Carayannis,et al. Word Length, Word Frequencies and Zipf’s Law in the Greek Language , 2001, J. Quant. Linguistics.
[43] Derek Besner,et al. Phonological Encoding in the Lexical Decision Task , 1979 .
[44] Heike Martensen,et al. Who is dominating the Dutch neighbourhood? On the role of subsyllabic units in Dutch nonword reading , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[45] S. Lupker,et al. Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming , 2003, Memory & cognition.
[46] Philip T Quinlan,et al. Orthographic processing in visual word identification , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.
[47] M. Brysbaert,et al. Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[48] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[49] J. Grainger. Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. , 1990 .
[50] J. Bowers. Masked priming: State of the Art , 2003 .
[51] Yasushi Hino,et al. Neighborhood Size and Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Word Recognition , 1995 .
[52] Chris Westbury,et al. The Probability of the Least Likely Non-Length-Controlled Bigram Affects Lexical Decision Reaction Times , 2002, Brain and Language.
[53] Michael N Jones,et al. Case-sensitive letter and bigram frequency counts from large-scale English corpora , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[54] A. Pollatsek,et al. Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[55] J. Ziegler,et al. Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.
[56] R. Baayen,et al. Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model , 1997 .
[57] J. Grainger,et al. Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition , 1998 .
[58] Brian D. Joseph,et al. The Modern Greek Language: A Descriptive Analysis of Standard Modern Greek , 1985 .