A Simplified Approach for the Annual and Spatial Evaluation of the Comfort Classes of Daylight Glare Using Vertical Illuminances

A simplified approach to calculate the daylight glare comfort class (imperceptible, perceptible, disturbing, or intolerable glare) on annual basis and for a grid of points in a space is presented. This method relies on the calculation of the vertical illuminance (Ev) for each grid point only, which is compared to an Ev threshold value for each daylight glare comfort class. These Ev threshold values are determined through a comparison with the Daylight Glare Probability (DGP) values on an annual basis through a fault-detection technique, for a reduced number of points. Compared to an annual calculation of exact DGP values on a certain grid, this approach is able to evaluate the daylight glare comfort classes only, but it is less time consuming. The paper presents and critically discusses this simplified method by means of its application to different case-studies: south and west oriented office in Turin (Lat 45.1° N), in which the DGP is assessed for three points in the space, considering glazing with different transmission properties (specular or scattering) and visible transmittances, as well as three operable internal shading systems (one venetian blinds and two roller blinds, for solar or glare control). For the presented case studies, the average error in the classification of the space according to daylight glare comfort classes is below 5% when comparing this simplified approach to related DGP values.

[1]  B. Olesen.  Indoor environmental input parameters for the design and assessment of energy performance of buildings , 2015 .

[2]  Iason Konstantzos,et al.  Experimental and simulation analysis of daylight glare probability in offices with dynamic window shades , 2015 .

[3]  Luigi Giovannini,et al.  A novel methodology to spatially evaluate DGP classes by means of vertical illuminances. Preliminary results , 2018 .

[4]  Eleanor S. Lee,et al.  End user impacts of automated electrochromic windows in a pilot retrofit application , 2012 .

[5]  R. G. Hopkinson,et al.  Glare from daylighting in buildings. , 1972, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  J. Mardaljevic,et al.  Climate-Based Daylight Analysis , 2008 .

[7]  Jan Wienold,et al.  Solar reflected glare affecting visual performance , 2014 .

[8]  Jan Wienold,et al.  Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras , 2006 .

[9]  Jean-Louis Scartezzini,et al.  Visual discomfort and glare rating assessment of integrated daylighting and electric lighting systems using HDR imaging techniques , 2010 .

[10]  MS Rea,et al.  Light as a circadian stimulus for architectural lighting , 2018 .

[11]  Jan Wienold,et al.  DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF BLIND CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR VISUAL COMFORT AND ENERGY BALANCE ANALYSIS , 2007 .

[12]  J. Wienold.  DYNAMIC DAYLIGHT GLARE EVALUATION , 2009 .

[13]  Marc Schiler,et al.  Investigation of Evalglare software, daylight glare probability and high dynamic range imaging for daylight glare analysis , 2013 .

[14]  Jan Wienold,et al.  Daylight Discomfort Glare Evaluation with Evalglare: Influence of Parameters and Methods on the Accuracy of Discomfort Glare Prediction , 2018, Buildings.

[15]  Michele De Carli,et al.  Review on visual comfort in office buildings and influence of daylight in productivity , 2008 .

[16]  Santiago L Torres,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Simplified Daylight Glare Methods and Proposal of a new Method Based on the Cylindrical Illuminance , 2015 .

[17]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings , 2005 .

[18]  Steve Fotios,et al.  Human Factors in Lighting, 3rd ed. , 2015 .

[19]  Toshie Iwata,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON DISCOMFORT GLARE CAUSED BY WINDOWS PART 2 : Subjective response to glare from actual windows , 1992 .

[20]  Laura Bellia,et al.  Daylight glare: a review of discomfort indexes , 2008 .

[21]  R. G. Mistrick,et al.  Discomfort Glare from Sources of Nonuniform Luminance , 1995 .

[22]  Francesco Causone,et al.  A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design , 2015 .

[23]  Marilyne Andersen,et al.  MULTI-OBJECTIVE FACADE OPTIMIZATION FOR DAYLIGHTING DESIGN USING A GENETIC ALGORITHM , 2010 .

[24]  R. G. Hopkinson,et al.  The ergonomics of lighting , 1970 .

[25]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Useful daylight illuminances: A replacement for daylight factors , 2006 .

[26]  G. Barbato,et al.  Winter and summer analysis of daylight characteristics in offices , 2014 .

[27]  John Mardaljevic,et al.  Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design , 2006 .

[28]  Toshie Iwata,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON DISCOMFORT GLARE CAUSED BY WINDOWS : Subjective response to glare from a simulated window , 1992 .

[29]  J. Mardaljevic,et al.  DAYLIGHTING METRICS: IS THERE A RELATION BETWEEN USEFUL DAYLIGHT ILLUMINANCE AND DAYLIGHT GLARE PROBABILITY? , 2012 .

[30]  M. Velds,et al.  Assessment of lighting quality in office rooms with daylighting systems , 2000 .

[31]  Marilyne Andersen,et al.  Comprehensive annual daylight design through a goal-based approach , 2012 .

[32]  Werner Osterhaus,et al.  Discomfort glare assessment and prevention for daylight applications in office environments , 2005 .

[33]  R. Dogniaux,et al.  Glare from windows: current views of the problem , 1982 .

[34]  Wout J. M. van Bommel,et al.  Non-visual biological effect of lighting and the practical meaning for lighting for work. , 2006 .

[35]  J. Heerwagen,et al.  Circadian-effective light and its impact on alertness in office workers , 2019 .

[36]  Siân A. Kleindienst,et al.  The Adaptation of Daylight Glare Probability to Dynamic Metrics in a Computational Setting , 2009 .