CEO Tenure And Company Invention Under Differing Levels of Technological Dynamism

Following from research on firms' upper echelons, this article examines the previously unstudied issue of how technological dynamism moderates the relationship between a CEO's time in office and co...

[1]  M. Aldenderfer.  Cluster Analysis , 1984 .

[2]  David Miller,et al.  Chief executive personality and corporate strategy and structure in small firms , 1986 .

[3]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. , 1987 .

[4]  W. Davidson,et al.  ONE HAT TOO MANY: KEY EXECUTIVE PLURALITY AND SHAREHOLDER WEALTH , 1997 .

[5]  D. J. Miller.  CEO Salary Increases May be Rational After All: Referents and Contracts in CEO Pay , 1995 .

[6]  Timothy B. Folta.  Governance and uncertainty: the trade‐off between administrative control and commitment , 1998 .

[7]  Greg A. Stevens,et al.  3,000 Raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success! , 1997 .

[8]  Henry Mintzberg.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974, Operational Research Quarterly (1970-1977).

[9]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[10]  Jerker Denrell.  Vicarious Learning, Undersampling of Failure, and the Myths of Management , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[12]  B. Lawrence.  The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[13]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[14]  D. Hambrick,et al.  The seasons of a CEO's tenure. , 1991, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[15]  G T Watts,et al.  Risks and rewards. , 1977, British medical journal.

[16]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Large Shareholders and Corporate Control , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is Organization Theory Obvious to Practitioners? A Test of One Established Theory , 2000 .

[18]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[19]  Jamal Shamsie,et al.  Learning across the life cycle: Experimentation and performance among the hollywood studio heads , 2001 .

[20]  Andrew D. Henderson,et al.  Information-Processing Demands as a Determinant of Ceo Compensation , 1996 .

[21]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Substance and Symbolism in CEOs' Long-Term Incentive Plans , 1994 .

[22]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[23]  David F. Larcker,et al.  The Structure of Organizational Incentives , 1993 .

[24]  E. Mansfield.  Industrial research and technological innovation , 1968 .

[25]  David Miller,et al.  Some Organizational Consequences of Ceo Succession , 1993 .

[26]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Scientific output of small and medium size firms in high tech industries , 1990 .

[27]  Vincent L. Barker,et al.  CEO Characteristics and Firm R&D Spending , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[28]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[29]  Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld.  The Hero's Farewell: What Happens When CEOs Retire , 1988 .

[30]  J. Harrison,et al.  New CEOs Pursue Their Own Self-Interests by Sacrificing Stakeholder Value , 1999 .

[31]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[32]  Timothy B. Folta,et al.  Entry in the Presence of Dueling Options , 2004 .

[33]  Y. Amihud,et al.  Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers , 1981 .

[34]  G. T. Lumpkin,et al.  Simplicity as a Strategy-Making Process: The Effects of Stage of Organizational Development and Environment on Performance , 1995 .

[35]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1997 .

[36]  A. Sapienza.  Setting the record straight: The office of technology assessment report—pharmaceutical R&D costs, risks, and rewards , 1993 .

[37]  Erwin Danneels.  The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[38]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[39]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[40]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Architecture of Simplicity , 1993 .

[41]  Paul C. Nystrom,et al.  Environmental dynamism, complexity, and munificence as moderators of strategy-performance relationships , 1991 .

[42]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991 , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  Richard L. Priem.  Executive Judgment, Organizational Congruence, and Firm Performance , 1994 .

[44]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[45]  David J. Miller,et al.  Stale in the Saddle: CEO Tenure and the Match Between Organization and Environment , 1991 .

[46]  M. Tushman,et al.  On the Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a Sociology of Technological Evolution , 1992 .

[47]  A. Thomas.  Does leadership make a difference to organizational performance , 1988 .

[48]  H. Demsetz,et al.  The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[49]  K. Andrews.  The Concept of Corporate Strategy , 1971 .

[50]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF CLUSTER ANALYSIS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: AN ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE , 1996 .

[51]  Thomas A. Turk,et al.  Effects of Board and Ownership Structure on Corporate R&D Strategy , 1991 .

[52]  Sam Allgood,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CEO TENURE ON THE RELATION BETWEEN FIRM PERFORMANCE AND TURNOVER , 2000 .

[53]  Heather A. Haveman,et al.  Organizational Environments in Flux: The Impact of Regulatory Punctuations on Organizational Domains, CEO Succession, and Performance , 2001 .