Retinally-generated saccadic suppression of a locust looming-detector neuron: investigations using a robot locust

A fundamental task performed by many visual systems is to distinguish apparent motion caused by eye movements from real motion occurring within the environment. During saccadic eye movements, this task is achieved by inhibitory signals of central and retinal origin that suppress the output of motion-detecting neurons. To investigate the retinally-generated component of this suppression, we used a computational model of a locust looming-detecting pathway that experiences saccadic suppression. This model received input from the camera of a mobile robot that performed simple saccade-like movements, allowing the model's response to simplified real stimuli to be tested. Retinally-generated saccadic suppression resulted from two inhibitory mechanisms within the looming-detector's input architecture. One mechanism fed inhibition forward through the network, inhibiting the looming-detector's initial response to movement. The second spread inhibition laterally within the network, suppressing the looming-detector's maintained response to movement. These mechanisms prevent a loomingdetector model response to whole-field visual stimuli. In the locust, this mechanism of saccadic suppression may operate in addition to centrally-generated suppression. Because lateral inhibition is a common feature of early visual processing in many organisms, we discuss whether the mechanism of retinally-generated saccadic suppression found in the locust looming-detector model may also operate in these species.

[1]  F C Rind,et al.  A chemical synapse between two motion detecting neurones in the locust brain. , 1984, The Journal of experimental biology.

[2]  Pierre Carricaburu,et al.  Dynamic properties of the insect compound eye , 1978, Vision Research.

[3]  R. Robertson,et al.  Collision avoidance of flying locusts: steering torques and behaviour , 1993 .

[4]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Collision avoidance using a model of the locust LGMD neuron , 2000, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[5]  G. Laurent,et al.  Computation of Object Approach by a Wide-Field, Motion-Sensitive Neuron , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  M. O'Shea,et al.  Protection from habituation by lateral inhibition , 1975, Nature.

[7]  E. Castet,et al.  ‘Saccadic suppression’ – no need for an active extra-retinal mechanism , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  Michael O'Shea,et al.  The anatomy and output connection of a locust visual interneurone; the lobular giant movement detector (LGMD) neurone , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[9]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Saccadic Suppression , 2002, Science.

[10]  Michael O'Shea,et al.  The Anatomy of a Locust Visual Interneurone; the Descending Contralateral Movement Detector , 1974 .

[11]  H. Autrum,et al.  Handbook of sensory physiology. Vol. VII/6B. Comparative physiology and evolution of vision in invertebrates. B: invertebrate visual centers and behaviour I. , 1981 .

[12]  K. Hausen.  Functional Characterization and Anatomical Identification of Motion Sensitive Neurons in the Lobula plate of the Blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala , 1976 .

[13]  F C Rind,et al.  Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. II. Critical cues for detecting approaching objects. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  C. Koch,et al.  Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming , 2002, Nature.

[15]  C.W.G. CLIFFORD,et al.  A Model of Temporal Adaptation in Fly Motion Vision , 1996, Vision Research.

[16]  C. K. Peck,et al.  ‘Corollary discharge’ neurons in cat superior colliculus , 1984, Brain Research.

[17]  P. Simmons,et al.  Local circuit for the computation of object approach by an identified visual neuron in the locust , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  S. Mateeff,et al.  Various background pattern-effect on saccadic suppression. , 1975, Activitas nervosa superior.

[19]  D. Burr,et al.  Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements , 1994, Nature.

[20]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly's nervous system. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  B. L. Zuber,et al.  Saccadic suppression: elevation of visual threshold associated with saccadic eye movements. , 1966, Experimental neurology.

[22]  N M Grzywacz,et al.  The role of early retinal lateral inhibition: More than maximizing luminance information , 2000, Visual Neuroscience.

[23]  P. Simmons,et al.  Orthopteran DCMD neuron: a reevaluation of responses to moving objects. I. Selective responses to approaching objects. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Rind,et al.  The locust DCMD, a movement-detecting neurone tightly tuned to collision trajectories , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  A. C. James,et al.  Characterisation of columnar neurons and visual signal processing in the medulla of the locust optic lobe by system identification techniques , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[26]  R. Hengstenberg,et al.  Estimation of self-motion by optic flow processing in single visual interneurons , 1996, Nature.

[27]  S. Laughlin.  Neural Principles in the Peripheral Visual Systems of Invertebrates , 1981 .

[28]  Roger D Santer,et al.  Collision avoidance and a looming sensitive neuron: size matters but biggest is not necessarily best , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  M. Burrows,et al.  Connections between descending visual interneurons and metathoracic motoneurons in the locust , 1973, Journal of comparative physiology.

[30]  Martin Wilson,et al.  Angular sensitivity of light and dark adapted locust retinula cells , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.

[31]  Richard H Masland,et al.  Functional inhibition in direction-selective retinal ganglion cells: spatiotemporal extent and intralaminar interactions. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Locust’s Looming Detectors for Robot Sensors , 2003 .

[33]  H. Collewijn.  Eye‐ and head movements in freely moving rabbits. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  R. B. Pinter,et al.  Inhibition and Excitation in the Locust DCMD Receptive Field: Spatial Frequency, Temporal and Spatial Characteristics , 1979 .

[35]  John R. Gray,et al.  Activity of descending contralateral movement detector neurons and collision avoidance behaviour in response to head-on visual stimuli in locusts , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[36]  ROBERT B. PINTER.  Visual discrimination between small objects and large textured backgrounds , 1977, Nature.

[37]  Peter J. Simmons,et al.  Connexions between a movement-detecting visual interneurone and flight motoneurones of a locust. , 1980 .

[38]  M. Zaretsky,et al.  Quantitative measurements of centrally and retinally generated saccadic suppression in a locust movement detector neurone. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Response properties of relay cells in the A-laminae of the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus after saccades , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  F. Rind,et al.  Neural network based on the input organization of an identified neuron signaling impending collision. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  F. Lo,et al.  A study of neuronal circuitry mediating the saccadic suppression in the rabbit , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  How accurate need sensory coding be for behaviour? Experiments using a mobile robot , 2001, Neurocomputing.

[43]  E. Holst,et al.  Das Reafferenzprinzip , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[44]  C. Rowell,et al.  Saccadic suppression by corollary discharge in the locust , 1979, Nature.

[45]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Adaptation of the motion-sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[46]  Andrew M. Derrington,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of remote pattern masking , 1984, Vision Research.

[47]  D. M. MACKAY,et al.  Elevation of Visual Threshold by Displacement of Retinal Image , 1970, Nature.

[48]  Michael F. Land,et al.  The fast phase of optokinetic nystagmus in the locust , 1978 .

[49]  C. H. Fraser Rowell,et al.  The neuronal basis of a sensory analyser, the acridid movement detector system. IV. The preference for small field stimuli. , 1977, The Journal of experimental biology.

[50]  Paul F. M. J. Verschure,et al.  Using a Mobile Robot to Study Locust Collision Avoidance Responses , 1999, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[51]  D. N. Reye,et al.  WING MOVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH COLLISIONAVOIDANCE MANOEUVRES DURING FLIGHT IN THE LOCUST LOCUSTA MIGRATORIA , 1992 .

[52]  G. Schlotterer.  Response of the locust descending movement detector neuron to rapidly approaching and withdrawing visual stimuli , 1977 .

[53]  D. Osorio.  Mechanisms of early visual processing in the medulla of the locust optic lobe: How self-inhibition, spatial-pooling, and signal rectification contribute to the properties of transient cells , 1991, Visual Neuroscience.

[54]  John Palka,et al.  An inhibitory process influencing visual responses in a fibre of the ventral nerve cord of locusts , 1967 .

[55]  H. Noda.  Depression in the excitability of relay cells of lateral geniculate nucleus following saccadic eye movements in the cat. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[56]  D. Osorio,et al.  Directionally selective cells in the locust medulla , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[57]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The site of saccadic suppression , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  R. Sperry.  Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. , 1950, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.