Can we use atmospheric CO 2 measurements to verify emission trends reported by cities? Lessons from a six-year atmospheric inversion over Paris

. Existing CO 2 emissions reported by city inventories usually lag real-time by a year or more and are prone to large 20 uncertainties. This study responds to the growing need for timely and precise estimation of urban CO 2 emissions to support the present and future mitigation measures and policies. We focus on the Paris metropolitan area, the largest urban region in the European Union and the city with the densest atmospheric CO 2 observation network in Europe. We performed long-term atmospheric inversions to quantify the citywide CO 2 emissions, both fossil fuel and biogenic sources and sinks, over six years (2016-2021) using a Bayesian inverse modeling system. Our inversion framework benefits from a novel near-real-time hourly 25 fossil fuel CO 2 emission inventory (Origins.earth) at 1 km spatial resolution. In addition to the mid-afternoon observations, we attempt to assimilate morning CO 2 concentrations based on the ability of the WRF-Chem transport model to simulate atmospheric boundary layer dynamics constrained by observed layer heights. Our results show a long-term decreasing trend by around 2% per year in annual CO 2 emissions over the Paris region. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic led to a 13%±1% reduction in annual fossil fuel CO 2 emissions in 2020 with respect to 2019. Then, annual emissions increased by 5.2% from 32.6±2.2 MtCO 2 in 2020 30 to 34.3±2.3 MtCO 2 in 2021. Based on a combination of up-to-date inventories, high-resolution atmospheric modeling, and high-precision observations, our current capacity could deliver near real-time CO 2 emission estimates at city scale in less than a month, and the results agree within 10% with independent estimates from multiple city-scale inventories.

[1]  M. J. Costa,et al.  Atmospheric boundary layer height from ground-based remote sensing: a review of capabilities and limitations , 2023, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[2]  S. Davis,et al.  Carbon Monitor Cities near-real-time daily estimates of CO2 emissions from 1500 cities worldwide , 2022, Scientific data.

[3]  T. Lauvaux,et al.  High‐Resolution Lagrangian Inverse Modeling of CO2 Emissions Over the Paris Region During the First 2020 Lockdown Period , 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[4]  P. Ciais,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of an Urban CO2 Monitoring Network over the Paris Region through the COVID-19 Lockdown Natural Experiment. , 2022, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  P. Ciais,et al.  Sensitivity to the sources of uncertainties in the modeling of atmospheric CO2 concentration within and in the vicinity of Paris , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[6]  P. Tans,et al.  Revision of the World Meteorological Organization Global Atmosphere Watch (WMO/GAW) CO2 calibration scale , 2021 .

[7]  A. Karion,et al.  A Modified Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM) for the Eastern USA and Canada, Evaluated With Comparison to Atmospheric Observations and Other Biospheric Models , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences.

[8]  T. Lauvaux,et al.  Under-reporting of greenhouse gas emissions in U.S. cities , 2021, Nature Communications.

[9]  Sue Grimmond,et al.  Tailored Algorithms for the Detection of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Height from Common Automatic Lidars and Ceilometers (ALC) , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[10]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Observed Impacts of COVID‐19 on Urban CO2 Emissions , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[11]  K. Davis,et al.  Policy-Relevant Assessment of Urban CO2 Emissions. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  P. Ciais,et al.  Analysis of temporal and spatial variability of atmospheric CO2 concentration within Paris from the GreenLITE™ laser imaging experiment , 2019 .

[13]  T. Lauvaux,et al.  Errors and uncertainties in a gridded carbon dioxide emissions inventory , 2019, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[14]  P. Ciais,et al.  Analysis of temporal and spatial variability of atmospheric CO2 concentration within Paris from the GreenLITE™ laser imaging experiment , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[15]  R. Duren,et al.  The Hestia fossil fuel CO2 emissions data product for the Los Angeles megacity (Hestia-LA) , 2019, Earth System Science Data.

[16]  P. Ciais,et al.  XCO2 in an emission hot-spot region: the COCCON Paris campaign 2015 , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[17]  Colm Sweeney,et al.  Anthropogenic and biogenic CO2 fluxes in the Boston urban region , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  K. Davis,et al.  Toward reduced transport errors in a high resolution urban CO2 inversion system , 2017 .

[19]  K. Davis,et al.  The Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX): A test-bed for developing urban greenhouse gas emission measurements , 2017, Elementa.

[20]  Lin Wu,et al.  The first 1-year-long estimate of the Paris region fossil fuel CO 2 emissions based on atmospheric inversion , 2016 .

[21]  P. Ciais,et al.  What would dense atmospheric observation networks bring to the quantification of city CO 2 emissions , 2016 .

[22]  K. Davis,et al.  High‐resolution atmospheric inversion of urban CO2 emissions during the dormant season of the Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX) , 2016, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[23]  P. Ciais,et al.  Diurnal, synoptic and seasonal variability of atmospheric CO 2 in the Paris megacity area , 2016 .

[24]  A. Inaba,et al.  Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Spatial Planning , 2014 .

[25]  P. Bousquet,et al.  CO, NO x and 13 CO 2 as tracers for fossil fuel CO 2 : results from a pilot study in Paris during winter 2010 , 2013 .

[26]  Betty L. McCall “Influx” , 2012 .

[27]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Assessment of ground-based atmospheric observations for verification of greenhouse gas emissions from an urban region , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  C. Gerbig,et al.  Error characterization of CO 2 vertical mixing in the atmospheric transport model WRF-VPRM , 2011 .

[29]  P. Ciais,et al.  Atmospheric inversions for estimating CO2 fluxes: methods and perspectives , 2010 .

[30]  Allison L. Dunn,et al.  A satellite‐based biosphere parameterization for net ecosystem CO2 exchange: Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM) , 2008 .

[31]  Martin Jung,et al.  Exploiting synergies of global land cover products for carbon cycle modeling , 2006 .

[32]  Georg A. Grell,et al.  Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model , 2005 .

[33]  S. Bony,et al.  SIRTA, a ground-based atmospheric observatory for cloud and aerosol research , 2005 .

[34]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[35]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change , 1998 .

[36]  F. Beaufils,et al.  FRANCE , 1979, The Lancet.

[37]  A. Karion,et al.  An emerging GHG estimation approach can help cities achieve their climate and sustainability goals , 2021, Environmental Research Letters.

[38]  Stéphane La Branche,et al.  "Review author" pour les chapitres : 7- Energy Systems, 8- Transports, 12- Human Settlements, Infrastructure And Spatial Planning, 15- National and Sub-national Policies and Institution, in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, IPCC Working Group III Contribution to AR5 , 2014 .

[39]  W. Angevine,et al.  Multisensor Estimation of Mixing Heights over a Coastal City , 2008 .