Pathways for the European electricity supply system to 2050—The role of CCS to meet stringent CO2 reduction targets

Abstract This paper investigates the role of CCS technologies as part of a portfolio for reducing CO 2 emissions from the European electricity supply system until the year 2050. The analysis is carried out with the aid of a techno-economic model (with the objective to minimize the total system cost) including a detailed description of the present stationary European electricity supply system (power plants) and potential CO 2 storage sites as obtained from the Chalmers Energy Infrastructure databases. The ability of different EU Member States and regions to facilitate and to benefit from CCS will most likely depend on local conditions in terms of current energy mix, fuel supply chains and distance to suitable storage locations. Special emphasis is therefore put on analyzing turn-over in capital stock of the existing power plant infrastructure, timing of investments and the infrastructural implications of large scale introduction of CCS on a regional perspective. The paper discusses the role of and the requirements on CCS for meeting strict CO 2 emission reduction targets of 85% reduction from power generation by 2050 relative 1990 emissions in three different scenarios. All analysed scenarios apply the same cap on CO 2 emissions. The first scenario includes a continued growth in electricity demand (as presented in EU base-line projections). The second scenario includes stated EU targets for 2020 and indicative targets for 2050 with respect to increased energy efficiency, and thus, considers a lower growth in electricity demand compared to the base-line. The third scenario includes EU targets (to 2020 and indicative targets to 2050) on energy efficiency, equal to the second scenario, and EU targets of electricity from renewables. The results show that it is possible for the European electricity generation system to meet an 85% CO 2 reduction target by 2050 with a potentially large contribution from CCS. Up to 50% of the electricity generation will come from plants with CCS with a peak capture estimated to 1.8 GtCO 2 per year and cumulative CO 2 capture of about 39 GtCO 2 between 2020 and 2050 (it is assumed that CCS will be commercially available from 2020). As expected, countries which currently have high carbon intensity and which are located nearby suitable storage sites will benefit the most from CCS implementation. Hence, the results suggest that Italy has the largest demand for CCS with annual peak capture at around 0.5 GtCO 2 in the base-line scenario. The model results indicate a steep ramp-up of CCS post-2020, which imposes challenges for timely investments in corresponding CCS infrastructure including transportation and storage. A continued growth in electricity demand can lead to demand for CCS to such extent (in the base-line capacity build up is about 300 GW of CCS between 2020 and 2050) that the actual penetration level could be limited by fuel markets and power industries’ ability to supply fuel and CCS power plants.

[1]  Göran Berndes,et al.  The prospects for large-scale import of biomass and biofuels to Sweden a review of critical issues , 2006 .

[2]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[3]  Richard S. Middleton,et al.  A scalable infrastructure model for carbon capture and storage: SimCCS , 2009 .

[4]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[5]  H. M. Junginger,et al.  Production and trading of biomass for energy – an overview of the global status , 2007 .

[6]  The Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution , 1975 .

[7]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Diversity and Security in UK Electricity Generation: The Influence of Low Carbon Objectives , 2006 .

[8]  Aage Stangeland,et al.  A model for the CO2 capture potential , 2007 .

[9]  James J. Dooley,et al.  Modeling the impacts of climate policy on the deployment of carbon dioxide capture and geologic storage across electric power regions in the United States , 2007 .

[10]  F. Johnsson,et al.  Pathways for the North European electricity supply , 2009 .

[11]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Ramp-up of large-scale CCS infrastructure in Europe , 2009 .

[12]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Internalisation of external cost in the power generation sector: Analysis with Global Multi-regional MARKAL model , 2007 .

[13]  James J. Dooley,et al.  The value of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies in a world with uncertain greenhouse gas emissions constraints , 2009 .

[14]  R. Belmans,et al.  The role of electricity: A new path to secure, competitive energy in a carbon-constrained world , 2007 .

[15]  K. Ahrens AN ENERGY POLICY FOR EUROPE , 1974 .

[16]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  The European power plant infrastructure—Presentation of the Chalmers energy infrastructure database with applications , 2007 .