Outside the Pipeline: Reimagining Science Education for Nonscientists

Educational policy increasingly emphasizes knowledge and skills for the preprofessional “science pipeline” rather than helping students use science in daily life. We synthesize research on public engagement with science to develop a research-based plan for cultivating competent outsiders: nonscientists who can access and make sense of science relevant to their lives. Schools should help students access and interpret the science they need in response to specific practical problems, judge the credibility of scientific claims based on both evidence and institutional cues, and cultivate deep amateur involvement in science.

[1]  C. Hmelo‐Silver.  Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[2]  Angela Calabrese Barton,et al.  Rethinking Scientific Literacy , 2004 .

[3]  Matthew C. Nisbet,et al.  Science communication reconsidered , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Lynn D. Dierking,et al.  Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning , 2007 .

[5]  Steven Miller,et al.  Public understanding of science at the crossroads , 2001 .

[6]  J. Bransford.  How people learn , 2000 .

[7]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform , 1983, CACM.

[8]  N. Feinstein.  Salvaging science literacy , 2011 .

[9]  David Fortus,et al.  Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: A follow-up study , 2012 .

[10]  Jim Ryder,et al.  Identifying Science Understanding for Functional Scientific Literacy , 2001 .

[11]  J. Mestre.  Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective , 2005 .

[12]  George E. DeBoer,et al.  A history of ideas in science education : implications for practice , 1992 .

[13]  Okhee Lee,et al.  Diversity and equity in science education , 2014 .

[14]  Godfrey Vesey,et al.  A History of ‘Ideas’ , 1982, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series.

[15]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Problem-Based Learning in K–12 Education , 2011 .

[16]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education , 2009 .

[17]  S. Simon,et al.  Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications , 2003 .

[18]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Introduction to “New Conceptualizations of Transfer of Learning” , 2012 .

[19]  Jon D. Miller.  Adult Science Learning in the Internet Era , 2010 .

[20]  H. Simon,et al.  A study of how individuals solve complex and ill-structured problems , 1999 .

[21]  S. Semken,et al.  Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place‐based science teaching , 2008 .

[22]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science , 1992 .

[23]  Candie C. Wilderman,et al.  Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. , 2009 .

[24]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Supporting Students in Developing Literacy in Science , 2010, Science.

[25]  Noah Weeth Feinstein,et al.  Making sense of autism: Progressive engagement with science among parents of young, recently diagnosed autistic children , 2014, Public understanding of science.

[26]  D. Kahneman.  Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[27]  J. Ashby.  References and Notes , 1999 .

[28]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse , 2010, Science.

[29]  Judith Bennett,et al.  Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context‐based and STS approaches to science teaching , 2007 .

[30]  Stephen P. Norris,et al.  How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy , 2003 .

[31]  E. Boyer.  The Common Core. , 1978 .

[32]  Guy Robinson,et al.  On misunderstanding science , 1996 .